Making time for brain health: recognising temporal inequity in dementia risk reduction.

IF 14.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Susanne Röhr, Simone Reppermund, Annabel Matison, Suraj Samtani, Perminder S Sachdev
{"title":"Making time for brain health: recognising temporal inequity in dementia risk reduction.","authors":"Susanne Röhr, Simone Reppermund, Annabel Matison, Suraj Samtani, Perminder S Sachdev","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Time is an under-recognised social determinant of brain health, and is potentially as important as education or income for dementia risk. Temporal inequity refers to the unequal distribution of discretionary time owing to structural conditions shaping daily life. Temporal inequity encompasses insufficient time for rest, misaligned biological rhythms, fragmented leisure, and the encroachment of work or digital demands into personal time. Time poverty is a measurable manifestation, denoting insufficient time for brain health, disproportionately affecting structurally disadvantaged populations and exacerbated by performance-driven cultures. Although evidence for modifiable risk factors of dementia, such as sleep, physical activity, nutrition, and social engagement, is strong, adopting healthy behaviours requires time. In this Personal View, we integrate insights from epidemiology, neuroscience, and time-use research to argue that addressing temporal inequity is essential for brain health and dementia risk reduction. We call for temporal justice through research and policies that recognise time as both a resource and a site of inequity in ageing and dementia. Accordingly, we outline future research directions, including the development of metrics for temporal inequity, longitudinal studies linking time-use patterns to brain health outcomes, and intervention research to evaluate policies that expand equitable access to time.</p>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":" ","pages":"100768"},"PeriodicalIF":14.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Time is an under-recognised social determinant of brain health, and is potentially as important as education or income for dementia risk. Temporal inequity refers to the unequal distribution of discretionary time owing to structural conditions shaping daily life. Temporal inequity encompasses insufficient time for rest, misaligned biological rhythms, fragmented leisure, and the encroachment of work or digital demands into personal time. Time poverty is a measurable manifestation, denoting insufficient time for brain health, disproportionately affecting structurally disadvantaged populations and exacerbated by performance-driven cultures. Although evidence for modifiable risk factors of dementia, such as sleep, physical activity, nutrition, and social engagement, is strong, adopting healthy behaviours requires time. In this Personal View, we integrate insights from epidemiology, neuroscience, and time-use research to argue that addressing temporal inequity is essential for brain health and dementia risk reduction. We call for temporal justice through research and policies that recognise time as both a resource and a site of inequity in ageing and dementia. Accordingly, we outline future research directions, including the development of metrics for temporal inequity, longitudinal studies linking time-use patterns to brain health outcomes, and intervention research to evaluate policies that expand equitable access to time.

为大脑健康腾出时间:认识到减少痴呆症风险的时间不平等。
时间是一个未被充分认识到的大脑健康的社会决定因素,对于痴呆症风险来说,它可能与教育或收入一样重要。时间不平等是指由于塑造日常生活的结构性条件而造成的自由支配时间的不平等分配。时间不平等包括休息时间不足、生物节律失调、休闲零碎、工作或数字需求侵占个人时间。时间贫乏是一种可衡量的表现,表示没有足够的时间用于大脑健康,对结构上处于不利地位的人群造成不成比例的影响,并因绩效驱动的文化而加剧。尽管有关睡眠、身体活动、营养和社会参与等可改变的痴呆症风险因素的证据确凿,但养成健康的行为需要时间。在这篇个人观点中,我们整合了流行病学、神经科学和时间利用研究的见解,认为解决时间不平等对大脑健康和降低痴呆风险至关重要。我们呼吁通过研究和政策实现时间正义,承认时间既是一种资源,也是老龄化和痴呆症不平等的场所。因此,我们概述了未来的研究方向,包括时间不平等指标的发展,将时间使用模式与大脑健康结果联系起来的纵向研究,以及评估扩大公平获得时间的政策的干预研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Healthy Longevity
Lancet Healthy Longevity GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
192
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Healthy Longevity, a gold open-access journal, focuses on clinically-relevant longevity and healthy aging research. It covers early-stage clinical research on aging mechanisms, epidemiological studies, and societal research on changing populations. The journal includes clinical trials across disciplines, particularly in gerontology and age-specific clinical guidelines. In line with the Lancet family tradition, it advocates for the rights of all to healthy lives, emphasizing original research likely to impact clinical practice or thinking. Clinical and policy reviews also contribute to shaping the discourse in this rapidly growing discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信