A model testing study of cervical cancer screening behavior using rogers's protection motivation theory.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Mohammad Mehdi Mohammadi, Zohreh Karimi, Motahareh Shirani, Sona Elyasi, Hadiseh Monadi Ziarat
{"title":"A model testing study of cervical cancer screening behavior using rogers's protection motivation theory.","authors":"Mohammad Mehdi Mohammadi, Zohreh Karimi, Motahareh Shirani, Sona Elyasi, Hadiseh Monadi Ziarat","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-20214-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cervical cancer is a major global health issue, particularly in developing countries. Pap smear-based cervical cancer screening (CCS) is crucial for prevention. The Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) aids in understanding psychological factors influencing CCS behaviors. This study investigated CCS determinants among Iranian women using Rogers' PMT. This cross-sectional study involved 254 women visiting health centers in Kermanshah and Tehran in 2024. A modified PMT was used with a validated questionnaire measuring fear, perceived vulnerability, perceived intensity, response efficacy, self-efficacy, response cost, demographics, and CCS-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Path analysis was conducted using AMOS. Participants exhibited a mean CCS behavior score of 3.62 (SD = 2.07). Path analysis revealed significant negative total effects on CCS behavior for fear (Standardized Estimate = -0.238, p = 0.009), response cost (Standardized Estimate = -0.111, p = 0.006), and perceived vulnerability (Standardized Estimate = -0.064, p = 0.021). Conversely, positive total effects on CCS behavior were observed for response efficacy (Standardized Estimate = 0.049, p = 0.003), protection motivation (Standardized Estimate = 0.155, p = 0.01), self-efficacy (Standardized Estimate = 0.106, p = 0.007), knowledge (Standardized Estimate = 0.011, p = 0.002), and attitude (Standardized Estimate = 0.052, p = 0.007). Fear, response costs and perceived vulnerability negatively impact CCS behavior among Iranian women, while perceived intensity, response efficacy, protection motivation, knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy are positive factors. The PMT-based model can guide educational programs to promote CCS behavior, informing targeted counseling and program development to enhance CCS uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"36260"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12533052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20214-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cervical cancer is a major global health issue, particularly in developing countries. Pap smear-based cervical cancer screening (CCS) is crucial for prevention. The Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) aids in understanding psychological factors influencing CCS behaviors. This study investigated CCS determinants among Iranian women using Rogers' PMT. This cross-sectional study involved 254 women visiting health centers in Kermanshah and Tehran in 2024. A modified PMT was used with a validated questionnaire measuring fear, perceived vulnerability, perceived intensity, response efficacy, self-efficacy, response cost, demographics, and CCS-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Path analysis was conducted using AMOS. Participants exhibited a mean CCS behavior score of 3.62 (SD = 2.07). Path analysis revealed significant negative total effects on CCS behavior for fear (Standardized Estimate = -0.238, p = 0.009), response cost (Standardized Estimate = -0.111, p = 0.006), and perceived vulnerability (Standardized Estimate = -0.064, p = 0.021). Conversely, positive total effects on CCS behavior were observed for response efficacy (Standardized Estimate = 0.049, p = 0.003), protection motivation (Standardized Estimate = 0.155, p = 0.01), self-efficacy (Standardized Estimate = 0.106, p = 0.007), knowledge (Standardized Estimate = 0.011, p = 0.002), and attitude (Standardized Estimate = 0.052, p = 0.007). Fear, response costs and perceived vulnerability negatively impact CCS behavior among Iranian women, while perceived intensity, response efficacy, protection motivation, knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy are positive factors. The PMT-based model can guide educational programs to promote CCS behavior, informing targeted counseling and program development to enhance CCS uptake.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于罗杰斯保护动机理论的宫颈癌筛查行为模型检验研究。
宫颈癌是一个重大的全球健康问题,特别是在发展中国家。基于子宫颈抹片检查的宫颈癌筛查(CCS)对预防至关重要。保护动机理论有助于理解影响CCS行为的心理因素。本研究调查了使用罗杰斯PMT的伊朗妇女的CCS决定因素。这项横断面研究涉及2024年在克尔曼沙和德黑兰的健康中心就诊的254名妇女。采用改进后的PMT和一份有效问卷,测量恐惧、感知脆弱性、感知强度、反应效能、自我效能、反应成本、人口统计学和ccs相关知识、态度和实践。采用AMOS进行通径分析。参与者的CCS行为平均得分为3.62分(SD = 2.07)。通径分析显示,恐惧(标准化估计= -0.238,p = 0.009)、响应成本(标准化估计= -0.111,p = 0.006)和感知脆弱性(标准化估计= -0.064,p = 0.021)对CCS行为有显著的负向总影响。相反,反应效能(标准化估计= 0.049,p = 0.003)、保护动机(标准化估计= 0.155,p = 0.01)、自我效能(标准化估计= 0.106,p = 0.007)、知识(标准化估计= 0.011,p = 0.002)和态度(标准化估计= 0.052,p = 0.007)对CCS行为均有正向影响。恐惧、反应成本和感知脆弱性对伊朗妇女的CCS行为有负向影响,感知强度、反应效能、保护动机、知识、态度和自我效能为正向影响。基于pmt的模型可以指导教育项目促进CCS行为,为有针对性的咨询和项目开发提供信息,以提高CCS的吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信