The effects of lithium on cognition in humans: A systematic review.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Talitha Najmillah Sabtiari, Samuel Myrtle, Stelios Orfanos, Allan H Young, Rebecca Strawbridge
{"title":"The effects of lithium on cognition in humans: A systematic review.","authors":"Talitha Najmillah Sabtiari, Samuel Myrtle, Stelios Orfanos, Allan H Young, Rebecca Strawbridge","doi":"10.1177/02698811251371139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lithium, a mainstay treatment for bipolar disorders, has shown promise in treating cognitive impairments. However, concerns about cognition-related side effects persist.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to synthesise the evidence on how lithium affects cognition by comparing cognitive performance before and after starting lithium treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted to identify studies examining lithium's effects on cognition. The review considered studies with adult human participants that reported quantitative cognitive outcomes using within-subject comparisons between lithium-absent and lithium-present conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two articles describing 30 studies were included (727 participants, approximately 54% female, mean age ± 50 years old). The studies exhibited significant heterogeneity within cognitive domains, including global cognition (15 studies), memory (19 studies), processing and psychomotor speed (8 studies), attention (9 studies), verbal fluency (4 studies) and executive function (6 studies). The included studies comprised 16 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 14 non-RCTs, with study populations ranging from individuals with affective disorders (13 studies) to neurocognitive disorders (11 studies) and healthy individuals (6 studies). Some studies reported cognitive enhancements, particularly in individuals with affective disorders, while others documented declines or mixed results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Definitive conclusions regarding lithium's isolated cognitive effects remain elusive, particularly considering the influence of factors such as affective state, population and methodological heterogeneity among studies. Further research is needed to conclusively determine the raw cognitive impacts of lithium therapy, requiring larger RCTs across distinct populations. Prioritising the resolution of main symptoms should remain the primary therapeutic goal of lithium treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"2698811251371139"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811251371139","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lithium, a mainstay treatment for bipolar disorders, has shown promise in treating cognitive impairments. However, concerns about cognition-related side effects persist.

Aims: We aimed to synthesise the evidence on how lithium affects cognition by comparing cognitive performance before and after starting lithium treatment.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted to identify studies examining lithium's effects on cognition. The review considered studies with adult human participants that reported quantitative cognitive outcomes using within-subject comparisons between lithium-absent and lithium-present conditions.

Results: Thirty-two articles describing 30 studies were included (727 participants, approximately 54% female, mean age ± 50 years old). The studies exhibited significant heterogeneity within cognitive domains, including global cognition (15 studies), memory (19 studies), processing and psychomotor speed (8 studies), attention (9 studies), verbal fluency (4 studies) and executive function (6 studies). The included studies comprised 16 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 14 non-RCTs, with study populations ranging from individuals with affective disorders (13 studies) to neurocognitive disorders (11 studies) and healthy individuals (6 studies). Some studies reported cognitive enhancements, particularly in individuals with affective disorders, while others documented declines or mixed results.

Conclusions: Definitive conclusions regarding lithium's isolated cognitive effects remain elusive, particularly considering the influence of factors such as affective state, population and methodological heterogeneity among studies. Further research is needed to conclusively determine the raw cognitive impacts of lithium therapy, requiring larger RCTs across distinct populations. Prioritising the resolution of main symptoms should remain the primary therapeutic goal of lithium treatment.

锂对人类认知的影响:一项系统综述。
背景:锂,双相情感障碍的主要治疗方法,在治疗认知障碍方面显示出前景。然而,对认知相关副作用的担忧仍然存在。目的:我们旨在通过比较锂治疗前后的认知表现来综合锂如何影响认知的证据。方法:进行了系统的搜索,以确定研究锂对认知的影响。该综述考虑了对成年人类参与者的研究,这些研究报告了在不含锂和含锂条件下的定量认知结果。结果:纳入32篇文章,共30项研究(727名受试者,约54%为女性,平均年龄±50岁)。这些研究在认知领域显示出显著的异质性,包括全球认知(15项研究)、记忆(19项研究)、加工和精神运动速度(8项研究)、注意力(9项研究)、语言流畅性(4项研究)和执行功能(6项研究)。纳入的研究包括16项随机对照试验(RCTs)和14项非随机对照试验,研究人群从情感障碍患者(13项研究)到神经认知障碍患者(11项研究)和健康个体(6项研究)。一些研究报告了认知能力的增强,尤其是在患有情感障碍的个体中,而其他研究则记录了认知能力的下降或混合结果。结论:关于锂的孤立认知效应的明确结论仍然难以捉摸,特别是考虑到情感状态、人群和研究方法异质性等因素的影响。需要进一步的研究来最终确定锂治疗的原始认知影响,需要在不同人群中进行更大的随机对照试验。优先解决主要症状仍应是锂治疗的主要治疗目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信