Resistance Patterns and Optimization of Empirical Therapy for Urinary Tract Infections in Patients on Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Prophylaxis Against Pneumocystis jirovecii.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Kyohei Sugiyama, Keita Hirai, Madoka Kibe, Nanaho Fukumoto, Yukako Suyama, Kento Furuya, Kenta Ito, Kazuko Sakurai, Kunihiko Itoh
{"title":"Resistance Patterns and Optimization of Empirical Therapy for Urinary Tract Infections in Patients on Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Prophylaxis Against <i>Pneumocystis jirovecii</i>.","authors":"Kyohei Sugiyama, Keita Hirai, Madoka Kibe, Nanaho Fukumoto, Yukako Suyama, Kento Furuya, Kenta Ito, Kazuko Sakurai, Kunihiko Itoh","doi":"10.1177/10766294251388934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) is widely used for <i>Pneumocystis</i> pneumonia prophylaxis. However, prolonged use may induce antimicrobial resistance, potentially compromising empirical therapy for urinary tract infections (UTIs). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively analyzed 3,525 patients with positive urine cultures at Shizuoka General Hospital (2018-2023). Among them, 149 received SXT prophylaxis. Antimicrobial susceptibility and the relationship between prophylaxis duration and resistance were evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> were the most common pathogens. In the SXT prophylaxis group, <i>E. coli</i> susceptibility to SXT was significantly reduced (21.2% vs. 87.4%). Susceptibility to other antibiotics also declined, including ampicillin (31.2% vs. 71.6%), piperacillin (32.5% vs. 74.8%), levofloxacin (57.5% vs. 74.7%), and ciprofloxacin (56.2% vs. 74.1%). Susceptibility to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, including second-, third-, and fourth-generation agents remained preserved. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified a prophylaxis duration >406 days as predictive of SXT resistance (area under the curve 0.82, sensitivity 94%, and specificity 60%). Short-term prophylaxis (≤30 days) mitigated resistance, although <i>E. coli</i> susceptibility to SXT was still limited (47.8%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Prophylactic SXT use markedly reduces susceptibility to multiple antibiotics, especially penicillins and fluoroquinolones. Resistance correlates with prophylaxis duration. For empirical UTI therapy, intravenous expanded-spectrum cephalosporins may be preferable.</p>","PeriodicalId":18701,"journal":{"name":"Microbial drug resistance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial drug resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10766294251388934","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) is widely used for Pneumocystis pneumonia prophylaxis. However, prolonged use may induce antimicrobial resistance, potentially compromising empirical therapy for urinary tract infections (UTIs). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 3,525 patients with positive urine cultures at Shizuoka General Hospital (2018-2023). Among them, 149 received SXT prophylaxis. Antimicrobial susceptibility and the relationship between prophylaxis duration and resistance were evaluated. Results: Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most common pathogens. In the SXT prophylaxis group, E. coli susceptibility to SXT was significantly reduced (21.2% vs. 87.4%). Susceptibility to other antibiotics also declined, including ampicillin (31.2% vs. 71.6%), piperacillin (32.5% vs. 74.8%), levofloxacin (57.5% vs. 74.7%), and ciprofloxacin (56.2% vs. 74.1%). Susceptibility to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, including second-, third-, and fourth-generation agents remained preserved. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified a prophylaxis duration >406 days as predictive of SXT resistance (area under the curve 0.82, sensitivity 94%, and specificity 60%). Short-term prophylaxis (≤30 days) mitigated resistance, although E. coli susceptibility to SXT was still limited (47.8%). Conclusions: Prophylactic SXT use markedly reduces susceptibility to multiple antibiotics, especially penicillins and fluoroquinolones. Resistance correlates with prophylaxis duration. For empirical UTI therapy, intravenous expanded-spectrum cephalosporins may be preferable.

甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑预防乙氏肺囊虫尿路感染的耐药模式及经验治疗优化。
背景:甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(SXT)广泛用于肺囊虫肺炎的预防。然而,长期使用可能诱发抗菌素耐药性,潜在地影响尿路感染(uti)的经验性治疗。方法:回顾性分析2018-2023年静冈县总医院3525例尿培养阳性患者。其中,149人接受了SXT预防。评估药物敏感性及预防时间与耐药的关系。结果:大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌是最常见的致病菌。在SXT预防组,大肠杆菌对SXT的敏感性显著降低(21.2% vs. 87.4%)。对氨苄西林(31.2%比71.6%)、哌拉西林(32.5%比74.8%)、左氧氟沙星(57.5%比74.7%)、环丙沙星(56.2%比74.1%)的敏感性也有所下降。对广谱头孢菌素的易感性,包括第二代、第三代和第四代头孢菌素仍保持不变。受试者工作特征分析确定,预防持续时间bbb406天可预测sst耐药(曲线下面积0.82,敏感性94%,特异性60%)。短期预防(≤30天)减轻了耐药性,但大肠杆菌对SXT的敏感性仍然有限(47.8%)。结论:预防性使用SXT可显著降低对多种抗生素的敏感性,尤其是青霉素类和氟喹诺酮类药物。耐药性与预防持续时间相关。对于经验性尿路感染治疗,静脉注射广谱头孢菌素可能更可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbial drug resistance
Microbial drug resistance 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
118
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Microbial Drug Resistance (MDR) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that covers the global spread and threat of multi-drug resistant clones of major pathogens that are widely documented in hospitals and the scientific community. The Journal addresses the serious challenges of trying to decipher the molecular mechanisms of drug resistance. MDR provides a multidisciplinary forum for peer-reviewed original publications as well as topical reviews and special reports. MDR coverage includes: Molecular biology of resistance mechanisms Virulence genes and disease Molecular epidemiology Drug design Infection control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信