A novel methodology for assessing contact tracing precision: Phylogenetic validation of a contact tracing program for COVID-19 in Belgium

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Journal of virological methods Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jviromet.2025.115279
Jonathan Thibaut , Fabiana Gámbaro , Caspar Geenen , Samuel L. Hong , Joren Raymenants , Sarah Gorissen , Lize Cuypers , Piet Maes , Guy Baele , Simon Dellicour , Emmanuel André
{"title":"A novel methodology for assessing contact tracing precision: Phylogenetic validation of a contact tracing program for COVID-19 in Belgium","authors":"Jonathan Thibaut ,&nbsp;Fabiana Gámbaro ,&nbsp;Caspar Geenen ,&nbsp;Samuel L. Hong ,&nbsp;Joren Raymenants ,&nbsp;Sarah Gorissen ,&nbsp;Lize Cuypers ,&nbsp;Piet Maes ,&nbsp;Guy Baele ,&nbsp;Simon Dellicour ,&nbsp;Emmanuel André","doi":"10.1016/j.jviromet.2025.115279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During the COVID-19 pandemic, contact tracing was widely used to limit virus propagation and implement targeted disease control measures. It can however be difficult to assess whether infected cases are actually linked to the traced index case. In this study, we developed and applied an analytical pipeline using genomic data to assess the precision of contact tracing, defined as the proportion of transmission events suggested by contact tracing that are not contradicted by genomic analysis. We exemplify our approach by examining the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among students at Belgium’s largest university, in Leuven, during the Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 epidemic waves. We analysed 459 case-contact pairs identified through contact tracing. We then aimed to determine whether the pairs, where patients were infected with the same variant, clustered together within a time-scaled phylogeny. Our findings indicate that 34.6 % of transmission events suggested by contact tracing were not invalidated by our combined phylogenetic and single nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Only considering non invalidated transmission events, we estimated serial intervals with a smaller standard deviation than with all case-contact pairs. Our genomic-based pipeline allows us to assess the ability of our contact tracing program to correctly identify transmission chains. While contact tracing is crucial for early outbreak detection and control, monitoring its precision is vital for using this data in public health decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of virological methods","volume":"340 ","pages":"Article 115279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of virological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166093425001727","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, contact tracing was widely used to limit virus propagation and implement targeted disease control measures. It can however be difficult to assess whether infected cases are actually linked to the traced index case. In this study, we developed and applied an analytical pipeline using genomic data to assess the precision of contact tracing, defined as the proportion of transmission events suggested by contact tracing that are not contradicted by genomic analysis. We exemplify our approach by examining the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among students at Belgium’s largest university, in Leuven, during the Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 epidemic waves. We analysed 459 case-contact pairs identified through contact tracing. We then aimed to determine whether the pairs, where patients were infected with the same variant, clustered together within a time-scaled phylogeny. Our findings indicate that 34.6 % of transmission events suggested by contact tracing were not invalidated by our combined phylogenetic and single nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Only considering non invalidated transmission events, we estimated serial intervals with a smaller standard deviation than with all case-contact pairs. Our genomic-based pipeline allows us to assess the ability of our contact tracing program to correctly identify transmission chains. While contact tracing is crucial for early outbreak detection and control, monitoring its precision is vital for using this data in public health decisions.
评估接触者追踪精度的新方法:比利时COVID-19接触者追踪计划的系统发育验证。
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,接触者追踪被广泛用于限制病毒传播和实施有针对性的疾病控制措施。然而,很难评估感染病例是否确实与追踪到的指示病例有关。在这项研究中,我们开发并应用了一种使用基因组数据的分析管道来评估接触者追踪的精度,定义为接触者追踪所提示的与基因组分析不相矛盾的传播事件的比例。我们通过研究在Omicron BA.1和BA.2流行波期间,比利时最大的大学鲁汶大学的学生中SARS-CoV-2的传播来举例说明我们的方法。我们分析了通过接触者追踪确定的459对病例-接触者。然后,我们的目标是确定患者感染相同变体的对是否在一个时间尺度的系统发育中聚集在一起。我们的研究结果表明,通过系统发育和单核苷酸多态性联合分析,34.6%的接触者追踪提示的传播事件没有被证实。我们基于基因组学的途径使我们能够评估接触者追踪项目正确识别传播链的能力。虽然接触者追踪对早期发现和控制疫情至关重要,但监测其准确性对于在公共卫生决策中使用这些数据至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Virological Methods focuses on original, high quality research papers that describe novel and comprehensively tested methods which enhance human, animal, plant, bacterial or environmental virology and prions research and discovery. The methods may include, but not limited to, the study of: Viral components and morphology- Virus isolation, propagation and development of viral vectors- Viral pathogenesis, oncogenesis, vaccines and antivirals- Virus replication, host-pathogen interactions and responses- Virus transmission, prevention, control and treatment- Viral metagenomics and virome- Virus ecology, adaption and evolution- Applied virology such as nanotechnology- Viral diagnosis with novelty and comprehensive evaluation. We seek articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and laboratory protocols that include comprehensive technical details with statistical confirmations that provide validations against current best practice, international standards or quality assurance programs and which advance knowledge in virology leading to improved medical, veterinary or agricultural practices and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书