Jonathan Thibaut , Fabiana Gámbaro , Caspar Geenen , Samuel L. Hong , Joren Raymenants , Sarah Gorissen , Lize Cuypers , Piet Maes , Guy Baele , Simon Dellicour , Emmanuel André
{"title":"A novel methodology for assessing contact tracing precision: Phylogenetic validation of a contact tracing program for COVID-19 in Belgium","authors":"Jonathan Thibaut , Fabiana Gámbaro , Caspar Geenen , Samuel L. Hong , Joren Raymenants , Sarah Gorissen , Lize Cuypers , Piet Maes , Guy Baele , Simon Dellicour , Emmanuel André","doi":"10.1016/j.jviromet.2025.115279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During the COVID-19 pandemic, contact tracing was widely used to limit virus propagation and implement targeted disease control measures. It can however be difficult to assess whether infected cases are actually linked to the traced index case. In this study, we developed and applied an analytical pipeline using genomic data to assess the precision of contact tracing, defined as the proportion of transmission events suggested by contact tracing that are not contradicted by genomic analysis. We exemplify our approach by examining the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among students at Belgium’s largest university, in Leuven, during the Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 epidemic waves. We analysed 459 case-contact pairs identified through contact tracing. We then aimed to determine whether the pairs, where patients were infected with the same variant, clustered together within a time-scaled phylogeny. Our findings indicate that 34.6 % of transmission events suggested by contact tracing were not invalidated by our combined phylogenetic and single nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Only considering non invalidated transmission events, we estimated serial intervals with a smaller standard deviation than with all case-contact pairs. Our genomic-based pipeline allows us to assess the ability of our contact tracing program to correctly identify transmission chains. While contact tracing is crucial for early outbreak detection and control, monitoring its precision is vital for using this data in public health decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of virological methods","volume":"340 ","pages":"Article 115279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of virological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166093425001727","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, contact tracing was widely used to limit virus propagation and implement targeted disease control measures. It can however be difficult to assess whether infected cases are actually linked to the traced index case. In this study, we developed and applied an analytical pipeline using genomic data to assess the precision of contact tracing, defined as the proportion of transmission events suggested by contact tracing that are not contradicted by genomic analysis. We exemplify our approach by examining the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among students at Belgium’s largest university, in Leuven, during the Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 epidemic waves. We analysed 459 case-contact pairs identified through contact tracing. We then aimed to determine whether the pairs, where patients were infected with the same variant, clustered together within a time-scaled phylogeny. Our findings indicate that 34.6 % of transmission events suggested by contact tracing were not invalidated by our combined phylogenetic and single nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Only considering non invalidated transmission events, we estimated serial intervals with a smaller standard deviation than with all case-contact pairs. Our genomic-based pipeline allows us to assess the ability of our contact tracing program to correctly identify transmission chains. While contact tracing is crucial for early outbreak detection and control, monitoring its precision is vital for using this data in public health decisions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Virological Methods focuses on original, high quality research papers that describe novel and comprehensively tested methods which enhance human, animal, plant, bacterial or environmental virology and prions research and discovery.
The methods may include, but not limited to, the study of:
Viral components and morphology-
Virus isolation, propagation and development of viral vectors-
Viral pathogenesis, oncogenesis, vaccines and antivirals-
Virus replication, host-pathogen interactions and responses-
Virus transmission, prevention, control and treatment-
Viral metagenomics and virome-
Virus ecology, adaption and evolution-
Applied virology such as nanotechnology-
Viral diagnosis with novelty and comprehensive evaluation.
We seek articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and laboratory protocols that include comprehensive technical details with statistical confirmations that provide validations against current best practice, international standards or quality assurance programs and which advance knowledge in virology leading to improved medical, veterinary or agricultural practices and management.