Impact of Previous-day versus Same-day Warming of Cleavage-stage Embryos on Reproductive Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.1 Q2 Medicine
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-25 DOI:10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_98_25
Swati Singh, Ann Margaret Mangalaraj, Muthukumar Karthikeyan, N Jansi Rani, Aleyamma T Kunjummen, Mohan S Kamath
{"title":"Impact of Previous-day versus Same-day Warming of Cleavage-stage Embryos on Reproductive Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Swati Singh, Ann Margaret Mangalaraj, Muthukumar Karthikeyan, N Jansi Rani, Aleyamma T Kunjummen, Mohan S Kamath","doi":"10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_98_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have assessed the impact of culturing warmed cleavage-stage embryos to blastocyst in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles; there is a paucity of studies that have evaluated the impact of warming of day 3 embryos and culturing for a day before embryo transfer.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this research was to study whether warming of day 3 embryos and subsequent transfer on day 4 versus same-day warming and transfer of day 3 embryos improves the treatment outcomes following a FET.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery at Christian Medical College, Vellore, India. All couples who underwent FET at our centre between January 2016 and December 2023 were screened for eligibility.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The patients were divided into two groups according to the stage of the embryo that was transferred: warmed and transferred the same day as a day 3 embryo. The other group in which embryos were warmed the previous day of embryo transfer, cultured for 1 day and were transferred as day 4 embryo. The study groups were matched for age and body mass index by case-control matching. After case-control matching, 209 FET cycles were analysed in either group. The primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR).</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>A parametric <i>t</i>-test or non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used to find the difference between the groups. The Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to find the association between categorical variables. Univariate and multivariable analysis was performed with a multiple logistic regression model to assess the potential impact of those parameters on LBR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (41.1% vs. 38.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.548) and LBR per transfer (29.1% vs. 27.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.745) were comparable between day 3 versus day 4 transfer groups. Although the cycle cancellation rate was comparable in both the groups (0.8% in day 3 vs. 1.4% in day 4, <i>P</i> = 0.673), cryosurvival of embryos was higher in the day 3 group versus the day 4 group (86.3% vs. 81.7%), and the difference was significant (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the likelihood of achieving live birth did not depend on day of embryo transfer (odds ratio: 1.059, 95% confidence interval: 0.688-1.628, <i>P</i> = 0.793).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Warming cleavage-stage embryos and culturing for 1 extra day did not show any significant difference in FET outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences","volume":"18 3","pages":"141-147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527148/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_98_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies have assessed the impact of culturing warmed cleavage-stage embryos to blastocyst in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles; there is a paucity of studies that have evaluated the impact of warming of day 3 embryos and culturing for a day before embryo transfer.

Aim: The purpose of this research was to study whether warming of day 3 embryos and subsequent transfer on day 4 versus same-day warming and transfer of day 3 embryos improves the treatment outcomes following a FET.

Settings and design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery at Christian Medical College, Vellore, India. All couples who underwent FET at our centre between January 2016 and December 2023 were screened for eligibility.

Materials and methods: The patients were divided into two groups according to the stage of the embryo that was transferred: warmed and transferred the same day as a day 3 embryo. The other group in which embryos were warmed the previous day of embryo transfer, cultured for 1 day and were transferred as day 4 embryo. The study groups were matched for age and body mass index by case-control matching. After case-control matching, 209 FET cycles were analysed in either group. The primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR).

Statistical analysis used: A parametric t-test or non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used to find the difference between the groups. The Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to find the association between categorical variables. Univariate and multivariable analysis was performed with a multiple logistic regression model to assess the potential impact of those parameters on LBR.

Results: The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (41.1% vs. 38.2%, P = 0.548) and LBR per transfer (29.1% vs. 27.7%, P = 0.745) were comparable between day 3 versus day 4 transfer groups. Although the cycle cancellation rate was comparable in both the groups (0.8% in day 3 vs. 1.4% in day 4, P = 0.673), cryosurvival of embryos was higher in the day 3 group versus the day 4 group (86.3% vs. 81.7%), and the difference was significant (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the likelihood of achieving live birth did not depend on day of embryo transfer (odds ratio: 1.059, 95% confidence interval: 0.688-1.628, P = 0.793).

Conclusion: Warming cleavage-stage embryos and culturing for 1 extra day did not show any significant difference in FET outcomes.

Abstract Image

卵裂期胚胎的前一天和当天升温对生殖结果的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:研究已经评估了在冷冻胚胎移植(FET)周期中培养温暖的卵裂期胚胎对囊胚的影响;在胚胎移植前对第3天的胚胎进行加热和培养的影响进行评估的研究很少。目的:本研究的目的是研究第3天胚胎的加热和随后的第4天移植与第3天胚胎的同一天加热和转移是否能改善FET后的治疗结果。背景和设计:我们在印度Vellore基督教医学院生殖医学和外科学系进行了一项回顾性队列研究。所有在2016年1月至2023年12月期间在我们中心接受FET的夫妇都进行了资格筛选。材料与方法:根据移植胚胎的阶段将患者分为两组:加热组和当天作为第3天胚胎移植组。另一组胚胎在胚胎移植前一天加热,培养1天,作为第4天胚胎移植。实验组的年龄和体重指数通过病例对照匹配进行匹配。在病例-对照匹配后,对两组的209个FET周期进行分析。主要终点为活产率(LBR)。采用统计分析:采用参数t检验或非参数Mann-Whitney检验来发现组间差异。使用卡方检验和费雪精确检验来发现分类变量之间的关联。采用多元逻辑回归模型进行单变量和多变量分析,以评估这些参数对LBR的潜在影响。结果:第3天和第4天的临床妊娠率(41.1% vs. 38.2%, P = 0.548)和LBR (29.1% vs. 27.7%, P = 0.745)在第3天和第4天的移植组之间具有可比较性。虽然两组的周期取消率相当(第3天为0.8%,第4天为1.4%,P = 0.673),但第3天胚胎的冷冻存活率高于第4天(86.3%,81.7%),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,实现活产的可能性与胚胎移植日期无关(优势比:1.059,95%可信区间:0.688-1.628,P = 0.793)。结论:加热卵裂期胚胎和多培养1天对FET结果无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences (JHRS) (ISSN:0974-1208) a Quarterly peer-reviewed international journal is being launched in January 2008 under the auspices of Indian Society of Assisted Reproduction. The journal will cover all aspects human reproduction including Andrology, Assisted conception, Endocrinology, Physiology and Pathology, Implantation, Preimplantation Diagnosis, Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Embryology as well as Ethical, Legal and Social issues. The journal will publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书