Characterization of human skeletal stem cells in closed and open tibia fractures: a single center pilot study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2025.1638064
Rubén Tresgallo-Parés, David Morales, Shannon Tse, Aziz Saade, Ellen Fitzpatrick, Sean T Campbell, Gillian L Soles, Thomas H Ambrosi, Mark A Lee, Augustine M Saiz
{"title":"Characterization of human skeletal stem cells in closed and open tibia fractures: a single center pilot study.","authors":"Rubén Tresgallo-Parés, David Morales, Shannon Tse, Aziz Saade, Ellen Fitzpatrick, Sean T Campbell, Gillian L Soles, Thomas H Ambrosi, Mark A Lee, Augustine M Saiz","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2025.1638064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tibial shaft fractures are the most common long bone fractures and carry a significant risk of nonunion, particularly in open injuries. This increased risk has been attributed to heightened activation of damage-associated molecular pathways, cellular senescence, and alterations in the fracture milieu. However, most supporting evidence arises from animal studies under controlled conditions, and the cellular and biochemical environment of human traumatic fractures remains poorly understood. While mechanical and patient-related factors have been associated with impaired healing, the biological mechanisms are not well defined. Human skeletal stem cells (hSSCs) play a critical role in bone regeneration and may provide insight into differential healing responses. This study aimed to characterize hSSC recruitment and functional capacity in open versus closed tibial fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective pilot study of patients undergoing acute tibial shaft fixation at a Level 1 trauma center was conducted. During intramedullary nailing, reamings were collected for analysis. hSSCs were isolated via flow cytometry. Functional assays included colony-forming unit (CFU) counts and <i>in vitro</i> osteogenic differentiation via Alizarin Red staining. CD146<sup>+</sup> osteostromal cells were quantified, and serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), IL-6, and HbA1c levels were analyzed. Statistical comparisons were made between groups, and outliers were identified using the ROUT method (Q = 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>19 patients with isolated tibial shaft fractures (8 closed, 11 open) treated with intramedullary nailing were included. hSSC frequency was significantly lower in open fractures compared to closed fractures after outlier exclusion (2.75% ± 1.67% vs. 5.64% ± 5.80, p = 0.032), suggesting reduced early recruitment. However, no significant differences were observed in CFU capacity (0.0078 ± 0.0071 vs. 0.0156 ± 0.0117, p = 0.221) or osteogenic differentiation (1.24 ± 0.22 vs. 1.52 ± 0.85, p = 0.419). CD146<sup>+</sup> cell levels and serum markers were similar between groups. ALP levels correlated strongly with CD146<sup>+</sup> cell abundance in closed fractures (<i>ρ</i> = 0.80, p = 0.02) but not with hSSC levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Open tibial fractures demonstrate reduced early hSSC recruitment compared to closed fractures in the acute period of fracture healing, while <i>in vitro</i> stem cell function appears preserved. These findings support a model in which impaired healing in open fractures may result from reduced hSSC recruitment rather than dysfunction. Larger studies with long-term clinical follow-up are warranted to validate these results and explore therapeutic strategies targeting the hSSC niche to enhance fracture healing in high-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1638064"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12521247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1638064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Tibial shaft fractures are the most common long bone fractures and carry a significant risk of nonunion, particularly in open injuries. This increased risk has been attributed to heightened activation of damage-associated molecular pathways, cellular senescence, and alterations in the fracture milieu. However, most supporting evidence arises from animal studies under controlled conditions, and the cellular and biochemical environment of human traumatic fractures remains poorly understood. While mechanical and patient-related factors have been associated with impaired healing, the biological mechanisms are not well defined. Human skeletal stem cells (hSSCs) play a critical role in bone regeneration and may provide insight into differential healing responses. This study aimed to characterize hSSC recruitment and functional capacity in open versus closed tibial fractures.

Methods: A prospective pilot study of patients undergoing acute tibial shaft fixation at a Level 1 trauma center was conducted. During intramedullary nailing, reamings were collected for analysis. hSSCs were isolated via flow cytometry. Functional assays included colony-forming unit (CFU) counts and in vitro osteogenic differentiation via Alizarin Red staining. CD146+ osteostromal cells were quantified, and serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), IL-6, and HbA1c levels were analyzed. Statistical comparisons were made between groups, and outliers were identified using the ROUT method (Q = 5%).

Results: 19 patients with isolated tibial shaft fractures (8 closed, 11 open) treated with intramedullary nailing were included. hSSC frequency was significantly lower in open fractures compared to closed fractures after outlier exclusion (2.75% ± 1.67% vs. 5.64% ± 5.80, p = 0.032), suggesting reduced early recruitment. However, no significant differences were observed in CFU capacity (0.0078 ± 0.0071 vs. 0.0156 ± 0.0117, p = 0.221) or osteogenic differentiation (1.24 ± 0.22 vs. 1.52 ± 0.85, p = 0.419). CD146+ cell levels and serum markers were similar between groups. ALP levels correlated strongly with CD146+ cell abundance in closed fractures (ρ = 0.80, p = 0.02) but not with hSSC levels.

Conclusion: Open tibial fractures demonstrate reduced early hSSC recruitment compared to closed fractures in the acute period of fracture healing, while in vitro stem cell function appears preserved. These findings support a model in which impaired healing in open fractures may result from reduced hSSC recruitment rather than dysfunction. Larger studies with long-term clinical follow-up are warranted to validate these results and explore therapeutic strategies targeting the hSSC niche to enhance fracture healing in high-risk populations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

闭合性和开放性胫骨骨折中人类骨骼干细胞的表征:一项单中心试点研究。
胫骨干骨折是最常见的长骨骨折,具有显著的骨不愈合风险,尤其是开放性损伤。这种风险的增加归因于损伤相关分子通路的激活加剧、细胞衰老和骨折环境的改变。然而,大多数支持证据来自受控条件下的动物研究,人类创伤性骨折的细胞和生化环境仍然知之甚少。虽然机械和患者相关因素与愈合受损有关,但其生物学机制尚未明确。人类骨骼干细胞(hSSCs)在骨再生中起着关键作用,并可能为差异愈合反应提供见解。本研究旨在表征开放与封闭胫骨骨折中hSSC的募集和功能能力。方法:对在一级创伤中心接受急性胫干固定的患者进行前瞻性先导研究。髓内钉入时,取孔进行分析。流式细胞术分离hsc。功能检测包括菌落形成单位(CFU)计数和茜素红染色体外成骨分化。定量CD146+骨基质细胞,分析血清碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、白细胞介素6 (IL-6)和HbA1c水平。组间进行统计学比较,采用ROUT方法(Q = 5%)识别异常值。结果:采用髓内钉治疗孤立性胫骨干骨折19例(闭合性8例,开放性11例)。排除异常值后,开放性骨折的hSSC频率明显低于闭合性骨折(2.75%±1.67%比5.64%±5.80,p = 0.032),提示早期招募减少。然而,CFU容量(0.0078±0.0071比0.0156±0.0117,p = 0.221)或成骨分化(1.24±0.22比1.52±0.85,p = 0.419)无显著差异。两组间CD146+细胞水平和血清标志物相似。闭合性骨折中ALP水平与CD146+细胞丰度密切相关(ρ = 0.80, p = 0.02),但与hSSC水平无关。结论:与闭合性骨折相比,开放性胫骨骨折在骨折愈合的急性期早期hSSC募集减少,而体外干细胞功能似乎得到了保留。这些发现支持一个模型,即开放性骨折的愈合受损可能是由于hSSC募集减少而不是功能障碍。需要更大规模的长期临床随访研究来验证这些结果,并探索针对hSSC利基的治疗策略,以促进高危人群的骨折愈合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信