Microplastic Removal Efficiency of Four Wastewater Treatment Processes in Kunming: Mechanisms and Optimal Process Selection.

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Zhineng Xiao, Yuan Feng, Hui Qian, Shiyu Li, Hailong Yu
{"title":"Microplastic Removal Efficiency of Four Wastewater Treatment Processes in Kunming: Mechanisms and Optimal Process Selection.","authors":"Zhineng Xiao, Yuan Feng, Hui Qian, Shiyu Li, Hailong Yu","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02280-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the mass production and use of plastic products, Microplastic (MP) pollution is worsening due to widespread plastic use. Urban wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) fail to fully remove MPs, making their effluents a key source of aquatic MP pollution. This study compared MP removal efficiencies across four Kunming WWTPs using different processes (AAO-V, BIOCOS-D, AAO-MBR, AAO-D filters) to identify optimal treatments for future plants. Removal efficiencies ranked: AAO-MBR (99.9%) > BIOCOS-D (96.1%) > AAO-D (92.1%) > AAO-V (88.6%). AAO-MBR showed the highest efficiency, with biofilm filtration and adsorption as the main removal mechanisms. Future WWTP design should prioritize high MP removal efficiency alongside nitrogen and phosphorus removal, with AAO-MBR recommended as the optimal process. The removal rate of MPs should be properly considered along with those of nitrogen and phosphorus when developing future wastewater plants, and processes with high MP removal rates should be selected when possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02280-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the mass production and use of plastic products, Microplastic (MP) pollution is worsening due to widespread plastic use. Urban wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) fail to fully remove MPs, making their effluents a key source of aquatic MP pollution. This study compared MP removal efficiencies across four Kunming WWTPs using different processes (AAO-V, BIOCOS-D, AAO-MBR, AAO-D filters) to identify optimal treatments for future plants. Removal efficiencies ranked: AAO-MBR (99.9%) > BIOCOS-D (96.1%) > AAO-D (92.1%) > AAO-V (88.6%). AAO-MBR showed the highest efficiency, with biofilm filtration and adsorption as the main removal mechanisms. Future WWTP design should prioritize high MP removal efficiency alongside nitrogen and phosphorus removal, with AAO-MBR recommended as the optimal process. The removal rate of MPs should be properly considered along with those of nitrogen and phosphorus when developing future wastewater plants, and processes with high MP removal rates should be selected when possible.

昆明四种污水处理工艺的微塑料去除效率:机理与最佳工艺选择。
随着塑料制品的大量生产和使用,塑料的广泛使用导致微塑料污染日益严重。城市污水处理厂(WWTPs)不能完全去除MPs,使其流出物成为水生MP污染的主要来源。本研究比较了昆明四个污水处理厂使用不同工艺(AAO-V、BIOCOS-D、AAO-MBR、AAO-D过滤器)去除MP的效率,以确定未来工厂的最佳处理方法。去除率排序为:AAO-MBR(99.9%)、> bioos - d(96.1%)、> AAO-D(92.1%)、> AAO-V(88.6%)。AAO-MBR的去除效率最高,主要以生物膜过滤和吸附为主要去除机制。未来污水处理厂的设计应优先考虑高MP去除效率以及氮和磷的去除,AAO-MBR被推荐为最佳工艺。在开发未来的污水处理厂时,应适当考虑对多磺酸盐的去除率以及氮、磷的去除率,尽可能选择对多磺酸盐去除率高的工艺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信