Investigating the Effects of Occupational Noise and Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure on Oxidative Response in Power Plant Workers

IF 1.6 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Sediqeh Jafarimanesh, Hadi Ehsani, Fatemeh Shaki, Mahmood Moosazadeh, Seyed Ehsan Samaei
{"title":"Investigating the Effects of Occupational Noise and Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure on Oxidative Response in Power Plant Workers","authors":"Sediqeh Jafarimanesh,&nbsp;Hadi Ehsani,&nbsp;Fatemeh Shaki,&nbsp;Mahmood Moosazadeh,&nbsp;Seyed Ehsan Samaei","doi":"10.1002/bem.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Occupational noise and extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF) are common in power plants and represent important risk factors that may contribute to oxidative stress. This study examined how simultaneous exposure to these hazards affects oxidative stress biomarkers in workers under real-world conditions. Participants were assigned to one of four exposure groups: Control (C), Noise (N), ELF-EMF (E), or a combined Noise and ELF-EMF group (NE). Occupational noise and ELF-EMF exposures were measured according to ISO 9612 and IEEE Std C95.3.1, respectively. To assess oxidative stress, venous blood samples were collected from all participants, and plasma levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) were analyzed using validated biochemical assays. The NE group showed the highest MDA levels, indicating elevated lipid peroxidation compared with controls (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). GSH concentrations were lower in NE relative to controls (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). SOD activity was significantly reduced in both the N and NE groups compared with the control group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.005). TAC was lowest in the NE group, showing a significant decrease compared with both the control and Noise-only groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). While these findings suggest that concurrent exposure to noise and ELF-EMF can influence oxidative stress biomarkers, they do not provide direct evidence to mandate specific workplace monitoring or interventions. Further studies are needed to clarify potential health risks and to guide evidence-based occupational safety measures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8956,"journal":{"name":"Bioelectromagnetics","volume":"46 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioelectromagnetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bem.70027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Occupational noise and extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF) are common in power plants and represent important risk factors that may contribute to oxidative stress. This study examined how simultaneous exposure to these hazards affects oxidative stress biomarkers in workers under real-world conditions. Participants were assigned to one of four exposure groups: Control (C), Noise (N), ELF-EMF (E), or a combined Noise and ELF-EMF group (NE). Occupational noise and ELF-EMF exposures were measured according to ISO 9612 and IEEE Std C95.3.1, respectively. To assess oxidative stress, venous blood samples were collected from all participants, and plasma levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) were analyzed using validated biochemical assays. The NE group showed the highest MDA levels, indicating elevated lipid peroxidation compared with controls (p < 0.001). GSH concentrations were lower in NE relative to controls (p < 0.001). SOD activity was significantly reduced in both the N and NE groups compared with the control group (p < 0.005). TAC was lowest in the NE group, showing a significant decrease compared with both the control and Noise-only groups (p < 0.05). While these findings suggest that concurrent exposure to noise and ELF-EMF can influence oxidative stress biomarkers, they do not provide direct evidence to mandate specific workplace monitoring or interventions. Further studies are needed to clarify potential health risks and to guide evidence-based occupational safety measures.

研究职业性噪声和极低频电磁场暴露对电厂工人氧化反应的影响。
职业噪声和极低频电磁场(ELF-EMF)在发电厂中很常见,是可能导致氧化应激的重要危险因素。本研究调查了在现实世界条件下同时暴露于这些危害如何影响工人的氧化应激生物标志物。参与者被分配到四个暴露组中的一个:对照组(C)、噪声组(N)、极低频电磁场组(E)或噪声和极低频电磁场组合组(NE)。职业性噪声和ELF-EMF暴露分别按照ISO 9612和IEEE标准C95.3.1进行测量。为了评估氧化应激,收集了所有参与者的静脉血样本,并使用验证的生化分析分析血浆丙二醛(MDA)、谷胱甘肽(GSH)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和总抗氧化能力(TAC)水平。NE组显示出最高的MDA水平,表明与对照组相比,脂质过氧化水平升高(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioelectromagnetics
Bioelectromagnetics 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bioelectromagnetics is published by Wiley-Liss, Inc., for the Bioelectromagnetics Society and is the official journal of the Bioelectromagnetics Society and the European Bioelectromagnetics Association. It is a peer-reviewed, internationally circulated scientific journal that specializes in reporting original data on biological effects and applications of electromagnetic fields that range in frequency from zero hertz (static fields) to the terahertz undulations and visible light. Both experimental and clinical data are of interest to the journal''s readers as are theoretical papers or reviews that offer novel insights into or criticism of contemporary concepts and theories of field-body interactions. The Bioelectromagnetics Society, which sponsors the journal, also welcomes experimental or clinical papers on the domains of sonic and ultrasonic radiation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书