Evaluation of the Feasibility and Construct Validity of a Novel Method to Measure Household Fruit and Vegetable Procurement in Low-Income Community Settings
Melissa L. Horning PhD , Kristen S. Gorman PhD , Julia Steiner MPH , Julian Wolfson PhD , Jiayi Hu MS , Melissa N. Laska PhD, RD , Jayne A. Fulkerson PhD , Lisa Harnack DrPH, RD
{"title":"Evaluation of the Feasibility and Construct Validity of a Novel Method to Measure Household Fruit and Vegetable Procurement in Low-Income Community Settings","authors":"Melissa L. Horning PhD , Kristen S. Gorman PhD , Julia Steiner MPH , Julian Wolfson PhD , Jiayi Hu MS , Melissa N. Laska PhD, RD , Jayne A. Fulkerson PhD , Lisa Harnack DrPH, RD","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2025.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Many interventions focus on improving fruit and vegetable (F/V) procurement for those experiencing low incomes or food insecurity. To address current F/V procurement measurement limitations, a novel F/V procurement tool was developed.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The main objectives are to describe the tool and evaluate the tool’s feasibility and construct validity.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This cross-sectional study used baseline data from the ongoing Mobile Food Market Cluster Randomized Trial, conducted in the Twin Cities metropolitan area of Minnesota.</div></div><div><h3>Participants/setting</h3><div>During 2023, participants (mean age = 64 years) residing in subsidized housing completed surveys and three 24-hour dietary recalls, and they recorded 4 weeks of F/V procurement using a novel tool submitted weekly by mail. The tool captured F/V items and amounts procured for the home from any type of procurement location, including food pantries. For inclusion in analysis, Wave 1 and 2 trial participants (N = 161) must have completed at least 3 of 4 F/V procurement booklets; 87% (n = 140) met this threshold.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>Main outcomes were Healthy Eating Index-2020 score, Healthy Eating Index-2020 Total Fruit and Total Vegetable component scores, and daily F/V servings consumed.</div></div><div><h3>Statistical analyses performed</h3><div>Descriptive statistics assessed feasibility data (eg, booklet completion rates) and F/V servings by location/source data. The F/V procurement tool’s construct validity was assessed with adjusted linear models testing associations between average weekly servings procured of F/V combined, fruit only, and vegetables only, and dietary and survey measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>On average, 58% of weekly F/V servings procured were from a supermarket and 19% from a food pantry. In adjusted models, each 10-serving increase in F/V procurement was significantly associated with a higher Healthy Eating Index-2020 score by 1.8 points (95% CI, 0.6 to 2.9), Healthy Eating Index-2020 Total Fruit component score by 0.2 points (95% CI, 0.1 to 0.4), and daily F/V intake by 0.2 servings (95% CI, 0.1 to 0.3). No other measures were significantly associated with F/V servings procured.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This novel F/V procurement tool may be a feasible method for comprehensively measuring various ways F/V enter households. Construct validity was observed for most diet quality and dietary intake measures examined.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"126 2","pages":"Article 156220"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212267225008020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Many interventions focus on improving fruit and vegetable (F/V) procurement for those experiencing low incomes or food insecurity. To address current F/V procurement measurement limitations, a novel F/V procurement tool was developed.
Objective
The main objectives are to describe the tool and evaluate the tool’s feasibility and construct validity.
Design
This cross-sectional study used baseline data from the ongoing Mobile Food Market Cluster Randomized Trial, conducted in the Twin Cities metropolitan area of Minnesota.
Participants/setting
During 2023, participants (mean age = 64 years) residing in subsidized housing completed surveys and three 24-hour dietary recalls, and they recorded 4 weeks of F/V procurement using a novel tool submitted weekly by mail. The tool captured F/V items and amounts procured for the home from any type of procurement location, including food pantries. For inclusion in analysis, Wave 1 and 2 trial participants (N = 161) must have completed at least 3 of 4 F/V procurement booklets; 87% (n = 140) met this threshold.
Main outcome measures
Main outcomes were Healthy Eating Index-2020 score, Healthy Eating Index-2020 Total Fruit and Total Vegetable component scores, and daily F/V servings consumed.
Statistical analyses performed
Descriptive statistics assessed feasibility data (eg, booklet completion rates) and F/V servings by location/source data. The F/V procurement tool’s construct validity was assessed with adjusted linear models testing associations between average weekly servings procured of F/V combined, fruit only, and vegetables only, and dietary and survey measures.
Results
On average, 58% of weekly F/V servings procured were from a supermarket and 19% from a food pantry. In adjusted models, each 10-serving increase in F/V procurement was significantly associated with a higher Healthy Eating Index-2020 score by 1.8 points (95% CI, 0.6 to 2.9), Healthy Eating Index-2020 Total Fruit component score by 0.2 points (95% CI, 0.1 to 0.4), and daily F/V intake by 0.2 servings (95% CI, 0.1 to 0.3). No other measures were significantly associated with F/V servings procured.
Conclusions
This novel F/V procurement tool may be a feasible method for comprehensively measuring various ways F/V enter households. Construct validity was observed for most diet quality and dietary intake measures examined.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.