Increased Belowground Carbon Allocation Reduces Soil Carbon Losses Under Long‐Term Warming

IF 12 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Andreas Schindlbacher, Steve Kwatcho Kengdo, Jakob Heinzle, Ye Tian, Mathias Mayer, Josef Gadermaier, Chupei Shi, Caro Urbina Malo, Xiaofei Liu, Erich Inselsbacher, Robert Jandl, Carlos A. Sierra, Wolfgang Wanek, Werner Borken
{"title":"Increased Belowground Carbon Allocation Reduces Soil Carbon Losses Under Long‐Term Warming","authors":"Andreas Schindlbacher, Steve Kwatcho Kengdo, Jakob Heinzle, Ye Tian, Mathias Mayer, Josef Gadermaier, Chupei Shi, Caro Urbina Malo, Xiaofei Liu, Erich Inselsbacher, Robert Jandl, Carlos A. Sierra, Wolfgang Wanek, Werner Borken","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The response of the carbon cycle in forests to global warming could lead to a positive climate feedback if warming accelerates the mineralization of soil organic carbon (SOC), thereby causing net emissions of CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> into the atmosphere. In Europe, carbon‐rich alpine forest soils could be particularly affected by global warming, as a greater rise in temperature is expected in this region than the global average. Here we show that nearly two decades of experimental soil warming (+4°C during the snow‐free seasons) in a mountain forest in the Northern Limestone Alps significantly (~13% per 1°C warming) and persistently (no change in response over 18 years) increased soil CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> effluxes. The SOC stocks in the warmed plots decreased compared to controls, yet non‐significantly, and quantitatively much less than the surplus carbon outflux from warmed soil suggests. We attribute the increase in soil CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> efflux primarily to stimulation of root respiration, which was most sensitive to long‐term warming. Furthermore, increased root production, faster fine root turnover, and increased root exudation likely not only facilitated autotrophic respiration but also replenished the SOC pool. The radiocarbon age of SOC indicates a rejuvenation of SOC likely by increased input of root carbon into the lower topsoil. Overall, our findings suggest that increased C allocation into the rhizosphere can at least partially compensate for the C loss through increased SOC mineralization with rising temperatures over many years.","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"55 1","pages":"e70561"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70561","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The response of the carbon cycle in forests to global warming could lead to a positive climate feedback if warming accelerates the mineralization of soil organic carbon (SOC), thereby causing net emissions of CO2 into the atmosphere. In Europe, carbon‐rich alpine forest soils could be particularly affected by global warming, as a greater rise in temperature is expected in this region than the global average. Here we show that nearly two decades of experimental soil warming (+4°C during the snow‐free seasons) in a mountain forest in the Northern Limestone Alps significantly (~13% per 1°C warming) and persistently (no change in response over 18 years) increased soil CO2 effluxes. The SOC stocks in the warmed plots decreased compared to controls, yet non‐significantly, and quantitatively much less than the surplus carbon outflux from warmed soil suggests. We attribute the increase in soil CO2 efflux primarily to stimulation of root respiration, which was most sensitive to long‐term warming. Furthermore, increased root production, faster fine root turnover, and increased root exudation likely not only facilitated autotrophic respiration but also replenished the SOC pool. The radiocarbon age of SOC indicates a rejuvenation of SOC likely by increased input of root carbon into the lower topsoil. Overall, our findings suggest that increased C allocation into the rhizosphere can at least partially compensate for the C loss through increased SOC mineralization with rising temperatures over many years.

Abstract Image

增加地下碳分配减少了长期变暖下的土壤碳损失
如果气候变暖加速了土壤有机碳(SOC)的矿化,从而导致二氧化碳净排放到大气中,森林碳循环对全球变暖的响应可能导致气候正反馈。在欧洲,富含碳的高山森林土壤可能特别受到全球变暖的影响,因为该地区的气温上升幅度预计将高于全球平均水平。研究表明,近20年的试验土壤升温(无雪季节+4°C)显著(每升温1°C增加~13%)并持续(18年无变化)增加了北石灰石阿尔卑斯山区森林的土壤CO2通量。与对照相比,暖化样地的有机碳储量有所减少,但数量上远低于暖化土壤的剩余碳流出量。我们将土壤CO2外排的增加主要归因于对根系呼吸的刺激,而根系呼吸对长期变暖最为敏感。此外,根系产量的增加、细根周转的加快和根系渗出量的增加可能不仅促进了自养呼吸,而且补充了有机碳库。土壤有机碳的放射性碳年龄表明,土壤有机碳的恢复可能是由于根部碳输入增加而引起的。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,随着多年气温的升高,根际碳分配的增加至少可以部分补偿碳矿化带来的损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信