Machine Learning Analysis of Streamflow Recession Patterns Across Climates in the Contiguous United States

IF 5 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Hannah Haugen, Minseok Kim, Hannes Bauser, Andrew Bennett, Peter A. Troch
{"title":"Machine Learning Analysis of Streamflow Recession Patterns Across Climates in the Contiguous United States","authors":"Hannah Haugen, Minseok Kim, Hannes Bauser, Andrew Bennett, Peter A. Troch","doi":"10.1029/2025wr039966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Streamflow recession analysis aims to understand the controls on low‐flow dynamics in catchments. Traditionally, this involves analyzing baseflow <jats:italic>Q</jats:italic> and its time derivative <jats:italic>dQ⁄dt</jats:italic> on log‐log plots, often revealing power‐law relationships. The slope of these power laws has been interpreted through hydraulic groundwater theory. However, recent studies challenge this interpretation, noting discrepancies between individual recession slopes and the aggregate power‐law slope. To address this, Kim et al. (2023), <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" xlink:href=\"https://doi.org/10.1029/2022wr032690\">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022wr032690</jats:ext-link> introduced a machine learning (ML) method for recession analysis, which explains the spread of point clouds and predicts individual event trajectories. This method reveals an attractor in phase space, suggesting individual recessions converge to a common trajectory, independent of past flows. Unlike traditional power‐law fits, the ML approach offers a more objective framework for analyzing recession dynamics. We applied this method to catchments across the contiguous United States (CONUS), chosen to reflect climate variability. Results show that in some catchments, attractors align with power‐law fits, while in others, they deviate significantly, suggesting unique low‐flow dynamics unexplained by hydraulic theory. In certain cases, attractors exhibit non‐linear patterns in log‐log space, highlighting hysteresis and climate‐driven variability. Our findings provide insights into the diversity of recession behaviors across climates, moving beyond the conventional focus on humid, mild‐seasonality catchments. The ML method establishes a foundation for interpreting complex low‐flow dynamics, offering a broader perspective on how climate influences catchment storage and release processes.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2025wr039966","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Streamflow recession analysis aims to understand the controls on low‐flow dynamics in catchments. Traditionally, this involves analyzing baseflow Q and its time derivative dQ⁄dt on log‐log plots, often revealing power‐law relationships. The slope of these power laws has been interpreted through hydraulic groundwater theory. However, recent studies challenge this interpretation, noting discrepancies between individual recession slopes and the aggregate power‐law slope. To address this, Kim et al. (2023), https://doi.org/10.1029/2022wr032690 introduced a machine learning (ML) method for recession analysis, which explains the spread of point clouds and predicts individual event trajectories. This method reveals an attractor in phase space, suggesting individual recessions converge to a common trajectory, independent of past flows. Unlike traditional power‐law fits, the ML approach offers a more objective framework for analyzing recession dynamics. We applied this method to catchments across the contiguous United States (CONUS), chosen to reflect climate variability. Results show that in some catchments, attractors align with power‐law fits, while in others, they deviate significantly, suggesting unique low‐flow dynamics unexplained by hydraulic theory. In certain cases, attractors exhibit non‐linear patterns in log‐log space, highlighting hysteresis and climate‐driven variability. Our findings provide insights into the diversity of recession behaviors across climates, moving beyond the conventional focus on humid, mild‐seasonality catchments. The ML method establishes a foundation for interpreting complex low‐flow dynamics, offering a broader perspective on how climate influences catchment storage and release processes.
美国连续地区跨气候的河流衰退模式机器学习分析
流量衰退分析的目的是了解对集水区低流量动态的控制。传统上,这涉及在对数-对数图上分析基流Q及其时间导数dQ / dt,通常揭示幂律关系。这些幂律的斜率已通过水力地下水理论加以解释。然而,最近的研究挑战了这一解释,指出了个体衰退斜率与总体幂律斜率之间的差异。为了解决这个问题,Kim等人(2023)https://doi.org/10.1029/2022wr032690引入了一种用于衰退分析的机器学习(ML)方法,该方法解释了点云的扩散并预测了单个事件的轨迹。该方法揭示了相空间中的吸引子,表明单个衰退收敛于一个共同的轨迹,独立于过去的流量。与传统的幂律拟合不同,机器学习方法为分析衰退动态提供了更客观的框架。我们将这种方法应用于美国相邻地区(CONUS)的集水区,选择这些集水区来反映气候变化。结果表明,在一些集水区,吸引子符合幂律拟合,而在另一些集水区,它们明显偏离,这表明水力理论无法解释的独特的低流量动力学。在某些情况下,吸引子在对数对数空间中表现出非线性模式,突出了滞后和气候驱动的变率。我们的研究结果提供了对不同气候条件下衰退行为多样性的见解,超越了对潮湿、温和季节性流域的传统关注。ML方法为解释复杂的低流量动力学奠定了基础,为气候如何影响流域储存和释放过程提供了更广阔的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信