Utility of Long Radial Artery Sheaths for Left Heart Catheterization.

Aarash Roshandel, Danielle Shields, Ehab Abaza, Louai Razzouk, Sunil V Rao, Joey Junarta
{"title":"Utility of Long Radial Artery Sheaths for Left Heart Catheterization.","authors":"Aarash Roshandel, Danielle Shields, Ehab Abaza, Louai Razzouk, Sunil V Rao, Joey Junarta","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increased vessel tortuosity may hinder the success of transradial procedures. Longer thin-walled, hydrophilic sheaths ≥ 75 cm can be placed into the ascending aorta and have the potential to avoid femoral access crossover.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied consecutive cases of patients undergoing left heart catheterization (LHC) where a 75 cm long thin-walled, hydrophilic sheath was used from 1/1/22 to 9/30/24. Patient and procedural characteristics were collected. Procedural data included indication, contrast load, radiation dose, procedural time, procedural complications, and the need to convert to femoral access.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study sample included 71 patients (mean age 69, 45% male). Comorbidities included hypertension (82%), hyperlipidemia (76%), and congestive heart failure (30%). Previous coronary artery disease was present in 31% of patients, and 20% of patients had undergone previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Indications for LHC included symptoms of stable ischemic heart disease (21%), abnormal non-invasive ischemic testing (52%), acute coronary syndrome (18%), and pre-operative evaluation for surgery (8%). The reason to switch to the long thin-walled, hydrophilic sheath was inability to engage the coronaries due to subclavian/brachiocephalic artery tortuosity (86%) or radial artery spasm (14%). After switching to the long thin-walled, hydrophilic sheath, 62/71 (87%) cases successfully engaged the coronaries without converting to femoral access. The mean procedure time was 36 min for diagnostic LHC cases (n = 46) and 72 min for PCI cases (n = 25). No procedural complications occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case series suggests that use of the long thin-walled, hydrophilic radial sheaths can avoid femoral access crossover in selected cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increased vessel tortuosity may hinder the success of transradial procedures. Longer thin-walled, hydrophilic sheaths ≥ 75 cm can be placed into the ascending aorta and have the potential to avoid femoral access crossover.

Methods: We studied consecutive cases of patients undergoing left heart catheterization (LHC) where a 75 cm long thin-walled, hydrophilic sheath was used from 1/1/22 to 9/30/24. Patient and procedural characteristics were collected. Procedural data included indication, contrast load, radiation dose, procedural time, procedural complications, and the need to convert to femoral access.

Results: Our study sample included 71 patients (mean age 69, 45% male). Comorbidities included hypertension (82%), hyperlipidemia (76%), and congestive heart failure (30%). Previous coronary artery disease was present in 31% of patients, and 20% of patients had undergone previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Indications for LHC included symptoms of stable ischemic heart disease (21%), abnormal non-invasive ischemic testing (52%), acute coronary syndrome (18%), and pre-operative evaluation for surgery (8%). The reason to switch to the long thin-walled, hydrophilic sheath was inability to engage the coronaries due to subclavian/brachiocephalic artery tortuosity (86%) or radial artery spasm (14%). After switching to the long thin-walled, hydrophilic sheath, 62/71 (87%) cases successfully engaged the coronaries without converting to femoral access. The mean procedure time was 36 min for diagnostic LHC cases (n = 46) and 72 min for PCI cases (n = 25). No procedural complications occurred.

Conclusion: This case series suggests that use of the long thin-walled, hydrophilic radial sheaths can avoid femoral access crossover in selected cases.

桡动脉长鞘在左心导管插入术中的应用。
背景:血管扭曲度增加可能会阻碍经桡骨手术的成功。≥75 cm的较长的薄壁亲水鞘可置入升主动脉,并有可能避免股动脉通路交叉。方法:对22年1月1日至24年9月30日连续行左心导管(LHC)术的患者进行研究。收集患者及手术特点。手术资料包括适应证、造影剂负荷、放射剂量、手术时间、手术并发症和转股通路的需要。结果:我们的研究样本包括71例患者(平均年龄69岁,45%为男性)。合并症包括高血压(82%)、高脂血症(76%)和充血性心力衰竭(30%)。31%的患者既往存在冠状动脉疾病,20%的患者既往接受过经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。LHC的适应症包括稳定的缺血性心脏病(21%)、异常的无创缺血性检查(52%)、急性冠状动脉综合征(18%)和手术前评估(8%)。改用长薄壁亲水鞘的原因是锁骨下/头臂动脉扭曲(86%)或桡动脉痉挛(14%)导致无法与冠状动脉接触。在切换到长薄壁、亲水鞘后,62/71(87%)的病例成功进入冠状动脉,而没有转换到股动脉通路。诊断性LHC病例(n = 46)的平均手术时间为36分钟,PCI病例(n = 25)的平均手术时间为72分钟。无手术并发症发生。结论:本病例提示,在某些病例中,使用长薄壁、亲水的桡骨鞘可以避免股骨通路交叉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信