Interpersonal brain synchronization at frontopolar cortices underlies better advice-taking in groups.

IF 3.1
Linwei Yu, Yutong Hua, Xiaorong Gan, Shuyi Li, Xiaolin Zhou, Yi Hu
{"title":"Interpersonal brain synchronization at frontopolar cortices underlies better advice-taking in groups.","authors":"Linwei Yu, Yutong Hua, Xiaorong Gan, Shuyi Li, Xiaolin Zhou, Yi Hu","doi":"10.1093/scan/nsaf110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We often seek advice from others outside our groups to optimize decision-making. This process may involve discerning the reliability of others, that is, whether the advice others provide is reliable enough to accept. However, little is known about how people collectively take advice from others. In this study, we recruited participant dyads (n = 35) to perform an advice-taking task, where they took advice collectively or individually from unreliable or reliable others. Interpersonal brain synchronization (IBS) was examined using a functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based hyperscanning technique. For advice from unreliable others, the dyads performed better than the individuals. The dyads demonstrated a higher learning rate for bad advice than for good advice, as indicated by the analysis of the Bayesian reinforcement learning model. Furthermore, they demonstrated enhanced IBS in the frontopolar cortex, which was positively correlated with learning rates and dyad performance. However, these findings did not apply to reliable others or individuals. This study shows that groups, compared to individuals, are better able to discern valuable advice from others, which may be associated with neural coupling between members. This suggests a cognitive-brain mechanism for group advice-taking.</p>","PeriodicalId":94208,"journal":{"name":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12828286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaf110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We often seek advice from others outside our groups to optimize decision-making. This process may involve discerning the reliability of others, that is, whether the advice others provide is reliable enough to accept. However, little is known about how people collectively take advice from others. In this study, we recruited participant dyads (n = 35) to perform an advice-taking task, where they took advice collectively or individually from unreliable or reliable others. Interpersonal brain synchronization (IBS) was examined using a functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based hyperscanning technique. For advice from unreliable others, the dyads performed better than the individuals. The dyads demonstrated a higher learning rate for bad advice than for good advice, as indicated by the analysis of the Bayesian reinforcement learning model. Furthermore, they demonstrated enhanced IBS in the frontopolar cortex, which was positively correlated with learning rates and dyad performance. However, these findings did not apply to reliable others or individuals. This study shows that groups, compared to individuals, are better able to discern valuable advice from others, which may be associated with neural coupling between members. This suggests a cognitive-brain mechanism for group advice-taking.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

额极皮层的人际大脑同步是群体中更好地接受建议的基础。
我们经常从团队之外的人那里寻求建议,以优化决策。这个过程可能涉及到辨别他人的可靠性,也就是说,他人提供的建议是否可靠到足以接受。然而,人们如何集体接受他人的建议却知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们招募了参与者二人组(n = 35)来执行一项听取建议的任务,在这项任务中,他们集体或单独听取不可靠或可靠的其他人的建议。采用基于功能近红外光谱的超扫描技术对人际脑同步(IBS)进行了研究。对于不可靠的人的建议,二人组的表现要好于个体组。正如贝叶斯强化学习模型的分析所表明的那样,二元组对坏建议的学习率高于对好建议的学习率。此外,他们在额极皮层表现出增强的IBS,这与学习速度和双人表现呈正相关。然而,这些发现并不适用于可靠的其他人或个人。这项研究表明,与个人相比,群体更能从其他人那里辨别出有价值的建议,这可能与成员之间的神经耦合有关。这表明了一种群体建议采纳的认知-大脑机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书