Effectiveness of instruments for assessing physical activity in adolescents: a systematic review.

Physical activity and nutrition Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-30 DOI:10.20463/pan.2025.0024
Zhuldyz Kuanysh, Anastassiya Vlassova, Aizat Seidakhmetova, Dana Auyezkhankyzy, Aizhan Baituganova, Feruza Saduyeva
{"title":"Effectiveness of instruments for assessing physical activity in adolescents: a systematic review.","authors":"Zhuldyz Kuanysh, Anastassiya Vlassova, Aizat Seidakhmetova, Dana Auyezkhankyzy, Aizhan Baituganova, Feruza Saduyeva","doi":"10.20463/pan.2025.0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The World Health Organization (WHO) reported in 2016 that 81% of adolescents aged 11 to 17 years have insufficient physical activity (PA). This decline, coupled with poor nutrition and sedentary lifestyles, has emerged as a global concern. Regular PA is linked to better academic performance, motor skills, sleep, and stronger bones and muscles. Although most interventions to enhance PA in children are school-based, these have not effectively increased the overall daily PA. This review assesses the effectiveness of new devices such as electronic watches and smartphones in evaluating PA in older schoolchildren.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. MEDLINE (PubMed) and Scopus were searched for articles. After removing duplicates, two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts. Methodological quality was assessed using standardized tools, and data were extracted systematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 2,259 articles, with 571 screened and 11 fully reviewed. Five studies were included, conducted in the USA, Namibia, Greece, Turkey, and Spain, involving adolescents averaging 13.8 years old. Three studies focused on self-reported tools, whereas two examined wearable monitors and smartphone apps. Waist-worn monitors displayed higher accuracy, whereas self-reported tools varied in validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both traditional and new PA assessment tools have strengths and limitations. Waist-worn monitors generally provide higher accuracy, whereas self-reported tools can be reliable if properly calibrated. Continuous evaluation is essential for improving PA assessment in school-age children.</p>","PeriodicalId":74444,"journal":{"name":"Physical activity and nutrition","volume":"29 3","pages":"40-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12530986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical activity and nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20463/pan.2025.0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The World Health Organization (WHO) reported in 2016 that 81% of adolescents aged 11 to 17 years have insufficient physical activity (PA). This decline, coupled with poor nutrition and sedentary lifestyles, has emerged as a global concern. Regular PA is linked to better academic performance, motor skills, sleep, and stronger bones and muscles. Although most interventions to enhance PA in children are school-based, these have not effectively increased the overall daily PA. This review assesses the effectiveness of new devices such as electronic watches and smartphones in evaluating PA in older schoolchildren.

Methods: This review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. MEDLINE (PubMed) and Scopus were searched for articles. After removing duplicates, two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts. Methodological quality was assessed using standardized tools, and data were extracted systematically.

Results: The search identified 2,259 articles, with 571 screened and 11 fully reviewed. Five studies were included, conducted in the USA, Namibia, Greece, Turkey, and Spain, involving adolescents averaging 13.8 years old. Three studies focused on self-reported tools, whereas two examined wearable monitors and smartphone apps. Waist-worn monitors displayed higher accuracy, whereas self-reported tools varied in validity and reliability.

Conclusion: Both traditional and new PA assessment tools have strengths and limitations. Waist-worn monitors generally provide higher accuracy, whereas self-reported tools can be reliable if properly calibrated. Continuous evaluation is essential for improving PA assessment in school-age children.

Abstract Image

评估青少年身体活动的工具的有效性:一项系统综述。
目的:世界卫生组织(WHO) 2016年报告称,81%的11至17岁青少年身体活动不足(PA)。这种下降,再加上营养不良和久坐不动的生活方式,已经成为全球关注的问题。定期PA与更好的学习成绩、运动技能、睡眠以及更强壮的骨骼和肌肉有关。虽然大多数提高儿童PA的干预措施都是以学校为基础的,但这些措施并没有有效地提高总体的日常PA。本综述评估了电子手表和智能手机等新设备在评估大龄学童PA方面的有效性。方法:本综述采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法。检索了MEDLINE (PubMed)和Scopus。在删除重复后,两位审稿人独立筛选标题、摘要和全文。使用标准化工具评估方法学质量,并系统地提取数据。结果:检索到2259篇文章,其中571篇被筛选,11篇被完全审查。包括在美国、纳米比亚、希腊、土耳其和西班牙进行的五项研究,涉及平均年龄为13.8岁的青少年。三项研究关注的是自我报告工具,而两项研究关注的是可穿戴显示器和智能手机应用。腰戴式监测器显示出更高的准确性,而自我报告的工具在有效性和可靠性方面存在差异。结论:传统PA评估工具和新型PA评估工具各有优缺点。腰戴式监测仪通常提供更高的准确性,而自我报告的工具如果校准得当则可以可靠。持续评价是改进学龄儿童PA评价的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书