Supporting the Well-Being of People Living With Dementia and Their Family Carers Through Concurrent Arts and Well-Being Community Programs: Qualitative Perspectives of Participants and Facilitators.

IF 2.2
Carolyn M Murray, Lenore de la Perrelle, Kerry Mart, John Baranoff, Geoff Richards, Gabrielle Rosa Hernandez, Angela Berndt
{"title":"Supporting the Well-Being of People Living With Dementia and Their Family Carers Through Concurrent Arts and Well-Being Community Programs: Qualitative Perspectives of Participants and Facilitators.","authors":"Carolyn M Murray, Lenore de la Perrelle, Kerry Mart, John Baranoff, Geoff Richards, Gabrielle Rosa Hernandez, Angela Berndt","doi":"10.1177/14713012251383967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community dwelling people with dementia and their family carers (dyads) may become increasingly isolated which can lead to lack of support, heightened stress levels, anxiety and difficulty coping. For both populations, there is a need for supportive and inviting programs that can provide social contact, respite, and promote engagement for well-being. A co-design workshop was conducted which led to the provision of a pilot six-week art program for people with dementia concurrent with a wellbeing program for their family carers. The research had two phases. Phase one was co-design informed by action research to decide on the content for the six-week concurrent programs and phase two used qualitative description to interpret participant perspectives about program outcomes. Data were collected <i>prior</i> to the programs through a co-design workshop, <i>during</i> the program through weekly reflections, and <i>after</i> program completion through interviews with dyads and a focus group with program facilitators. Twenty-one people participated in the co-design workshop which included two industry advocates, four caregivers, three people with dementia and twelve who did not specify. There were six dyads in the concurrent programs and six facilitators overall. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes developed in phase two included: relaxation, engagement and trust; recognising and developing new skills and abilities; and connecting over shared experiences. The co-designing process supported trust and led to programs that provided social support and opportunity for engagement. Having the dyads separated but nearby helped people to relax, knowing the other was doing something enriching. Concurrent programs for people with dementia and their caregivers must be tailored to their needs, have small group sizes that allow for social connection and trained facilitators that focus on the process of 'doing' activities and having fun over the outcome or product.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012251383967"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251383967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community dwelling people with dementia and their family carers (dyads) may become increasingly isolated which can lead to lack of support, heightened stress levels, anxiety and difficulty coping. For both populations, there is a need for supportive and inviting programs that can provide social contact, respite, and promote engagement for well-being. A co-design workshop was conducted which led to the provision of a pilot six-week art program for people with dementia concurrent with a wellbeing program for their family carers. The research had two phases. Phase one was co-design informed by action research to decide on the content for the six-week concurrent programs and phase two used qualitative description to interpret participant perspectives about program outcomes. Data were collected prior to the programs through a co-design workshop, during the program through weekly reflections, and after program completion through interviews with dyads and a focus group with program facilitators. Twenty-one people participated in the co-design workshop which included two industry advocates, four caregivers, three people with dementia and twelve who did not specify. There were six dyads in the concurrent programs and six facilitators overall. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes developed in phase two included: relaxation, engagement and trust; recognising and developing new skills and abilities; and connecting over shared experiences. The co-designing process supported trust and led to programs that provided social support and opportunity for engagement. Having the dyads separated but nearby helped people to relax, knowing the other was doing something enriching. Concurrent programs for people with dementia and their caregivers must be tailored to their needs, have small group sizes that allow for social connection and trained facilitators that focus on the process of 'doing' activities and having fun over the outcome or product.

通过并行艺术和福利社区计划支持痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者的福祉:参与者和促进者的定性观点。
社区居住的痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者(二人组)可能越来越孤立,这可能导致缺乏支持、压力水平升高、焦虑和应对困难。对于这两个群体来说,都需要支持性和邀请性的项目,以提供社会联系、喘息机会,并促进对福祉的参与。共同设计的工作坊为痴呆症患者提供了一个为期六周的试点艺术项目,同时为他们的家庭照顾者提供了一个福利项目。这项研究分为两个阶段。第一阶段是共同设计,通过行动研究来决定为期六周的并行项目的内容,第二阶段使用定性描述来解释参与者对项目结果的看法。在项目开始前通过共同设计研讨会收集数据,在项目期间通过每周反思收集数据,在项目完成后通过与二人组的访谈和与项目协调员的焦点小组收集数据。21人参加了共同设计研讨会,其中包括2名行业倡导者、4名护理人员、3名痴呆症患者和12名没有具体说明的人。在并行项目中有6对,总共有6个促进者。数据分析采用反身性主题分析。第二阶段发展的三个主题包括:放松、参与和信任;认识和发展新的技能和能力;通过共同的经历来建立联系。共同设计的过程支持了信任,并导致了提供社会支持和参与机会的项目。让两个人分开但在附近有助于人们放松,因为他们知道另一个人正在做一些充实的事情。针对痴呆症患者及其护理人员的并行项目必须根据他们的需求量身定制,小组规模小,以便建立社会联系,训练有素的辅导员专注于“做”活动的过程,并从结果或产品中获得乐趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信