Predicting Cycloplegic Spherical Equivalent Refraction Among Children and Adolescents Using Non-cycloplegic Data and Machine Learning - China, 2020-2024.
IF 2.9 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Keke Liu, Ran Qin, Huijuan Luo, Huining Kuang, Ranbo E, Chenyu Zhang, Bingjie Sun, Xin Guo
{"title":"Predicting Cycloplegic Spherical Equivalent Refraction Among Children and Adolescents Using Non-cycloplegic Data and Machine Learning - China, 2020-2024.","authors":"Keke Liu, Ran Qin, Huijuan Luo, Huining Kuang, Ranbo E, Chenyu Zhang, Bingjie Sun, Xin Guo","doi":"10.46234/ccdcw2025.217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cycloplegic refraction is the gold standard for assessing refractive error in children. However, logistical constraints hinder its implementation in large-scale surveys.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data obtained from a nationwide ocular health survey conducted in ten provincial-level administrative divisions in China were analyzed (2020-2024). Participants aged 5-18 years underwent standardized non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction, axial length (AL), corneal radius (CR), and AL/CR measurements. Random forest and XGBoost models were trained to predict the cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) using non-cycloplegic SE, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and biometric parameters. Performance was evaluated using R<sup>2</sup>, root mean square error (RMSE), and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both models exhibited strong predictive performance. In the test set, random forest achieved R<sup>2</sup>=0.88 and RMSE=0.55 diopter (D), whereas XGBoost achieved R<sup>2</sup>=0.89 and RMSE=0.54 D. Non-cycloplegic SE, AL/CR ratio, AL, and UCVA were consistently the top predictors. The predicted SE exhibited strong agreement with the cycloplegic SE, with minimal residual bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning models incorporating noncycloplegic SE and ocular biometrics accurately estimate cycloplegic SE in children and adolescents, providing a practical alternative for large-scale refractive-error surveillance when cycloplegia is impractical.</p>","PeriodicalId":69039,"journal":{"name":"中国疾病预防控制中心周报","volume":"7 40","pages":"1284-1289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国疾病预防控制中心周报","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2025.217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Cycloplegic refraction is the gold standard for assessing refractive error in children. However, logistical constraints hinder its implementation in large-scale surveys.
Methods: Data obtained from a nationwide ocular health survey conducted in ten provincial-level administrative divisions in China were analyzed (2020-2024). Participants aged 5-18 years underwent standardized non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction, axial length (AL), corneal radius (CR), and AL/CR measurements. Random forest and XGBoost models were trained to predict the cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) using non-cycloplegic SE, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and biometric parameters. Performance was evaluated using R2, root mean square error (RMSE), and Bland-Altman analysis.
Results: Both models exhibited strong predictive performance. In the test set, random forest achieved R2=0.88 and RMSE=0.55 diopter (D), whereas XGBoost achieved R2=0.89 and RMSE=0.54 D. Non-cycloplegic SE, AL/CR ratio, AL, and UCVA were consistently the top predictors. The predicted SE exhibited strong agreement with the cycloplegic SE, with minimal residual bias.
Conclusion: Machine learning models incorporating noncycloplegic SE and ocular biometrics accurately estimate cycloplegic SE in children and adolescents, providing a practical alternative for large-scale refractive-error surveillance when cycloplegia is impractical.