{"title":"A Taxonomy for Understanding the Disuse of Technology by Older Adults: A Qualitative Analysis of Disuse of Smart Speakers.","authors":"Emily C Gleaton, Richard Catrambone","doi":"10.1177/00187208251386675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study examines the disuse of technology among older adults and develops a taxonomy to categorize various forms of disuse.BackgroundUnderstanding the prevalence and factors contributing to disuse is challenging due to the varying terminology and lack of a standard classification. This lack of clarity makes it difficult to understand the reasons for the disuse of technology, especially when studying the use of emerging assistive technology among older adults. This is problematic, as these emerging technologies offer numerous benefits, but many adults struggle to incorporate them into their daily lives, resulting in disuse.MethodWe analyzed open-ended survey responses from 78 older adults who had purchased but subsequently disused a smart speaker. We employed a reflexive thematic analysis to identify themes related to the disuse of technology.ResultsTwo overarching themes were identified. The first, \"Interests and Purchase Influences,\" captured the initial reasons for adoption, ranging from general curiosity to meeting specific needs. The second, \"Misalignment with Needs and Expectations,\" encompassed four subthemes: disspointment, lack of relevance, perceived risks, and impact on independence, which collectively explained why participants ultimately stopped using the device.ConclusionThese findings demonstrate how varied experiences with the same technology result in distinct disuse trajectories, highlighting the gap between adoption and disuse research. Clarifying these patterns strengthens the disuse taxonomy and lays the groundwork for future studies to quantify their impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"187208251386675"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208251386675","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study examines the disuse of technology among older adults and develops a taxonomy to categorize various forms of disuse.BackgroundUnderstanding the prevalence and factors contributing to disuse is challenging due to the varying terminology and lack of a standard classification. This lack of clarity makes it difficult to understand the reasons for the disuse of technology, especially when studying the use of emerging assistive technology among older adults. This is problematic, as these emerging technologies offer numerous benefits, but many adults struggle to incorporate them into their daily lives, resulting in disuse.MethodWe analyzed open-ended survey responses from 78 older adults who had purchased but subsequently disused a smart speaker. We employed a reflexive thematic analysis to identify themes related to the disuse of technology.ResultsTwo overarching themes were identified. The first, "Interests and Purchase Influences," captured the initial reasons for adoption, ranging from general curiosity to meeting specific needs. The second, "Misalignment with Needs and Expectations," encompassed four subthemes: disspointment, lack of relevance, perceived risks, and impact on independence, which collectively explained why participants ultimately stopped using the device.ConclusionThese findings demonstrate how varied experiences with the same technology result in distinct disuse trajectories, highlighting the gap between adoption and disuse research. Clarifying these patterns strengthens the disuse taxonomy and lays the groundwork for future studies to quantify their impact.
期刊介绍:
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.