A Taxonomy for Understanding the Disuse of Technology by Older Adults: A Qualitative Analysis of Disuse of Smart Speakers.

IF 3.3 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Emily C Gleaton, Richard Catrambone
{"title":"A Taxonomy for Understanding the Disuse of Technology by Older Adults: A Qualitative Analysis of Disuse of Smart Speakers.","authors":"Emily C Gleaton, Richard Catrambone","doi":"10.1177/00187208251386675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study examines the disuse of technology among older adults and develops a taxonomy to categorize various forms of disuse.BackgroundUnderstanding the prevalence and factors contributing to disuse is challenging due to the varying terminology and lack of a standard classification. This lack of clarity makes it difficult to understand the reasons for the disuse of technology, especially when studying the use of emerging assistive technology among older adults. This is problematic, as these emerging technologies offer numerous benefits, but many adults struggle to incorporate them into their daily lives, resulting in disuse.MethodWe analyzed open-ended survey responses from 78 older adults who had purchased but subsequently disused a smart speaker. We employed a reflexive thematic analysis to identify themes related to the disuse of technology.ResultsTwo overarching themes were identified. The first, \"Interests and Purchase Influences,\" captured the initial reasons for adoption, ranging from general curiosity to meeting specific needs. The second, \"Misalignment with Needs and Expectations,\" encompassed four subthemes: disspointment, lack of relevance, perceived risks, and impact on independence, which collectively explained why participants ultimately stopped using the device.ConclusionThese findings demonstrate how varied experiences with the same technology result in distinct disuse trajectories, highlighting the gap between adoption and disuse research. Clarifying these patterns strengthens the disuse taxonomy and lays the groundwork for future studies to quantify their impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"187208251386675"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208251386675","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study examines the disuse of technology among older adults and develops a taxonomy to categorize various forms of disuse.BackgroundUnderstanding the prevalence and factors contributing to disuse is challenging due to the varying terminology and lack of a standard classification. This lack of clarity makes it difficult to understand the reasons for the disuse of technology, especially when studying the use of emerging assistive technology among older adults. This is problematic, as these emerging technologies offer numerous benefits, but many adults struggle to incorporate them into their daily lives, resulting in disuse.MethodWe analyzed open-ended survey responses from 78 older adults who had purchased but subsequently disused a smart speaker. We employed a reflexive thematic analysis to identify themes related to the disuse of technology.ResultsTwo overarching themes were identified. The first, "Interests and Purchase Influences," captured the initial reasons for adoption, ranging from general curiosity to meeting specific needs. The second, "Misalignment with Needs and Expectations," encompassed four subthemes: disspointment, lack of relevance, perceived risks, and impact on independence, which collectively explained why participants ultimately stopped using the device.ConclusionThese findings demonstrate how varied experiences with the same technology result in distinct disuse trajectories, highlighting the gap between adoption and disuse research. Clarifying these patterns strengthens the disuse taxonomy and lays the groundwork for future studies to quantify their impact.

理解老年人不使用技术的分类:对智能扬声器不使用的定性分析。
目的:本研究考察了老年人对技术的弃用情况,并对各种弃用形式进行了分类。由于不同的术语和缺乏标准分类,了解导致废弃的流行程度和因素是具有挑战性的。这种缺乏明确性使得很难理解不使用技术的原因,特别是在研究老年人使用新兴辅助技术时。这是有问题的,因为这些新兴技术提供了许多好处,但许多成年人很难将它们融入日常生活,导致它们被废弃。我们分析了78名购买了智能音箱但随后停用的老年人的开放式调查反馈。我们采用反身性主题分析来确定与技术废弃相关的主题。结果确定了两个总体主题。第一部分,“兴趣和购买影响”,捕获了采用的最初原因,从一般的好奇心到满足特定的需求。第二个主题是“与需求和期望不一致”,包含四个子主题:失望、缺乏相关性、感知风险和对独立性的影响,这四个主题共同解释了参与者最终停止使用该设备的原因。这些研究结果表明,使用相同技术的不同经验如何导致不同的废弃轨迹,突出了采用和废弃研究之间的差距。澄清这些模式加强了废弃分类,并为未来量化其影响的研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信