"Beauty knows no bounds": Exploring the influence of body size and content focus on women's body positivity

IF 6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Body Image Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-14 DOI:10.1016/j.bodyim.2025.101985
Weixi Zeng , Junyi Chen , Yi-Xin Zhou , Nainan Wen
{"title":"\"Beauty knows no bounds\": Exploring the influence of body size and content focus on women's body positivity","authors":"Weixi Zeng ,&nbsp;Junyi Chen ,&nbsp;Yi-Xin Zhou ,&nbsp;Nainan Wen","doi":"10.1016/j.bodyim.2025.101985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Body positivity is a movement that promotes acceptance and appreciation of all body types. While previous research has explored the role of different model body types in promoting body positivity, there is no clear consensus on whether average-sized or plus-sized models would generate more positive outcomes. Moreover, most studies have focused on Western populations, leaving a gap in understanding within non-Western contexts. Average-sized models are often associated with assimilation effects, whereas plus-sized models are linked to downward comparison effects. Firstly, this study compared the influence of average-sized versus plus-sized models on body appreciation. Secondly, it also investigated how content focus—either aesthetic or functionality-based—influences body appreciation, and whether body size and content focus interact. Finally, the study explored the moderating role of self-esteem in shaping women's responses to model body size and content focus. Based on a 2 (average vs. plus-sized model) × 2 (aesthetic vs. functionality-focused content) experiment with 354 Chinese women (<em>M</em><sub><em>age</em></sub> = 31.68, <em>M</em><sub><em>BMI</em></sub> = 21.46), the findings showed that plus-sized models led to higher levels of body appreciation. Although content focus alone did not yield significant differences, an interaction effect emerged: plus-sized models paired with aesthetic-focused content led to greater body appreciation than the same content presented with average-sized models. Additionally, the study revealed a moderating effect of self-esteem on women's preferences for models and content. Women with high self-esteem preferred average-sized models and aesthetic-focused content, while those with low self-esteem favored plus-sized models and functionality-focused content. These findings have practical implications for promoting positive body image among women.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48312,"journal":{"name":"Body Image","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101985"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Body Image","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740144525001366","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Body positivity is a movement that promotes acceptance and appreciation of all body types. While previous research has explored the role of different model body types in promoting body positivity, there is no clear consensus on whether average-sized or plus-sized models would generate more positive outcomes. Moreover, most studies have focused on Western populations, leaving a gap in understanding within non-Western contexts. Average-sized models are often associated with assimilation effects, whereas plus-sized models are linked to downward comparison effects. Firstly, this study compared the influence of average-sized versus plus-sized models on body appreciation. Secondly, it also investigated how content focus—either aesthetic or functionality-based—influences body appreciation, and whether body size and content focus interact. Finally, the study explored the moderating role of self-esteem in shaping women's responses to model body size and content focus. Based on a 2 (average vs. plus-sized model) × 2 (aesthetic vs. functionality-focused content) experiment with 354 Chinese women (Mage = 31.68, MBMI = 21.46), the findings showed that plus-sized models led to higher levels of body appreciation. Although content focus alone did not yield significant differences, an interaction effect emerged: plus-sized models paired with aesthetic-focused content led to greater body appreciation than the same content presented with average-sized models. Additionally, the study revealed a moderating effect of self-esteem on women's preferences for models and content. Women with high self-esteem preferred average-sized models and aesthetic-focused content, while those with low self-esteem favored plus-sized models and functionality-focused content. These findings have practical implications for promoting positive body image among women.
“美无疆界”:探索体型和内容对女性身体积极性的影响。
身体积极是一种促进接受和欣赏所有体型的运动。虽然之前的研究已经探讨了不同体型的模特在促进身体积极性方面的作用,但对于中等身材的模特和大身材的模特是否会产生更积极的结果,并没有明确的共识。此外,大多数研究都集中在西方人群身上,在非西方背景下的理解上留下了空白。平均尺寸模型通常与同化效应有关,而大尺寸模型则与向下比较效应有关。首先,本研究比较了中码模特和大码模特对身体欣赏的影响。其次,它还调查了内容焦点(无论是基于审美还是基于功能)如何影响身体欣赏,以及身体大小和内容焦点是否相互作用。最后,本研究探讨了自尊在塑造女性对模特身材和内容焦点的反应中的调节作用。基于对354名中国女性(Mage = 31.68, MBMI = 21.46)进行的2(平均与大码模特)× 2(审美与功能重点内容)实验,研究结果表明,大码模特对身体的欣赏程度更高。虽然内容关注本身并没有产生显著的差异,但一种交互效应出现了:大码模特搭配以审美为重点的内容,比同样的内容搭配中等身材的模特,会带来更大的身体欣赏。此外,该研究还揭示了自尊对女性对模特和内容的偏好有调节作用。高自尊的女性更喜欢中等身材的模特和以审美为重点的内容,而低自尊的女性更喜欢大身材的模特和以功能为重点的内容。这些发现对于促进女性积极的身体形象具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Body Image
Body Image Multiple-
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
28.80%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Body Image is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality, scientific articles on body image and human physical appearance. Body Image is a multi-faceted concept that refers to persons perceptions and attitudes about their own body, particularly but not exclusively its appearance. The journal invites contributions from a broad range of disciplines-psychological science, other social and behavioral sciences, and medical and health sciences. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, theoretical and review papers, and science-based practitioner reports of interest. Dissertation abstracts are also published online, and the journal gives an annual award for the best doctoral dissertation in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书