Enhancing data governance in collaborative research: Introducing SA DTA 1.1.

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS
D Thaldar, M Botes, L Swales, P Esselaar
{"title":"Enhancing data governance in collaborative research: Introducing SA DTA 1.1.","authors":"D Thaldar, M Botes, L Swales, P Esselaar","doi":"10.7196/sajbl.2024.v17i2.2300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The SA DTA was updated to better serve the South African research community by providing clarity on exactly when - at what stage during research - institutions hold rights to the data they generate in collaborative research contexts where raw data are received and integrated with other data. SA DTA 1.1 introduces significant enhancements in data governance, focusing on the explicit definition and management of 'inferential data'.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To introduce SA DTA 1.1 and demonstrate its practical application in real-world research contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a descriptive design, the study presents two practical case studies: one involving two universities and another a university and a pharmaceutical company. The first case focuses on identifying genetic markers for neurodegenerative diseases, while the second addresses genetic markers for chronic diseases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first case study, the entity conducting the analysis generated inferential data independently, thereby gaining sole rights in such data. In the second case study, both collaborating entities contributed to the data analysis, leading to joint rights in the inferential data. These findings demonstrate the flexibility and clarity provided by SA DTA 1.1 in managing data ownership and intellectual property rights.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SA DTA 1.1 significantly advances data governance by providing clear and adaptable guidelines for data rights in collaborative research. It supports ethical and efficient data sharing, protecting researchers' interests and fostering global scientific innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":43498,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12520612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/sajbl.2024.v17i2.2300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The SA DTA was updated to better serve the South African research community by providing clarity on exactly when - at what stage during research - institutions hold rights to the data they generate in collaborative research contexts where raw data are received and integrated with other data. SA DTA 1.1 introduces significant enhancements in data governance, focusing on the explicit definition and management of 'inferential data'.

Objectives: To introduce SA DTA 1.1 and demonstrate its practical application in real-world research contexts.

Methods: Using a descriptive design, the study presents two practical case studies: one involving two universities and another a university and a pharmaceutical company. The first case focuses on identifying genetic markers for neurodegenerative diseases, while the second addresses genetic markers for chronic diseases.

Results: In the first case study, the entity conducting the analysis generated inferential data independently, thereby gaining sole rights in such data. In the second case study, both collaborating entities contributed to the data analysis, leading to joint rights in the inferential data. These findings demonstrate the flexibility and clarity provided by SA DTA 1.1 in managing data ownership and intellectual property rights.

Conclusion: SA DTA 1.1 significantly advances data governance by providing clear and adaptable guidelines for data rights in collaborative research. It supports ethical and efficient data sharing, protecting researchers' interests and fostering global scientific innovation.

加强协作研究中的数据治理:介绍SA DTA 1.1。
背景:SA DTA的更新是为了更好地为南非研究界服务,它明确了机构在什么时候——在研究的哪个阶段——对它们在协作研究环境中产生的数据拥有权利,在协作研究环境中,原始数据被接收并与其他数据集成。SA DTA 1.1在数据治理方面引入了重要的增强功能,重点是“推理数据”的明确定义和管理。目的:介绍SA DTA 1.1并展示其在现实世界研究背景中的实际应用。方法:采用描述性设计,研究提出了两个实际案例研究:一个涉及两所大学,另一个涉及一所大学和一家制药公司。第一个案例侧重于识别神经退行性疾病的遗传标记,而第二个案例侧重于慢性疾病的遗传标记。结果:在第一个案例研究中,进行分析的实体独立生成了推断数据,从而获得了对这些数据的独家权利。在第二个案例研究中,两个合作实体都为数据分析做出了贡献,从而导致了对推理数据的共同权利。这些发现证明了SA DTA 1.1在管理数据所有权和知识产权方面提供的灵活性和清晰度。结论:SA DTA 1.1通过为合作研究中的数据权利提供清晰、适应性强的指导方针,显著推进了数据治理。它支持道德和有效的数据共享,保护研究人员的利益,促进全球科学创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
18
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书