[Double extra-intracranial microvascular anastomoses in deconstructive surgeries for giant aneurysms of internal carotid and middle cerebral arteries].

Q4 Medicine
N G Kobyakov, V A Lukshin, Yu V Pilipenko, A A Shulgina, M V Kondakov, D Yu Usachev
{"title":"[Double extra-intracranial microvascular anastomoses in deconstructive surgeries for giant aneurysms of internal carotid and middle cerebral arteries].","authors":"N G Kobyakov, V A Lukshin, Yu V Pilipenko, A A Shulgina, M V Kondakov, D Yu Usachev","doi":"10.17116/neiro20258905116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deconstructive interventions with exclusion of the parent artery are one of the possible methods of treatment for giant and fusiform aneurysms of cerebral arteries if aneurysm occlusion with coils or insertion of flow-diverting stents are technically impossible. Such interventions are associated with high risks of stroke. In such cases, surgical revascularization with double barrel extra-intracranial bypass may be advisable to reduce the risks of ischemic complications, perioperative mortality and improve long-term neurological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 25 patients with large and giant aneurysms of internal carotid (ICA) and middle cerebral arteries (MCA). All ones underwent double barrel bypass surgery with subsequent exclusion of aneurysm by endovascular or open method between 2015 and 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up was 11 [6; 25] months. Total exclusion of aneurysm was achieved in 24 (96%) patients. Ischemic complications occurred in 7 (28%) patients. The causes of ischemic complications were different: insufficient revascularization (<i>n</i>=3); EICMA thrombosis (<i>n</i>=1); ischemia in perforator basin (<i>n</i>=3). The risk of ischemic complications was higher in patients with aneurysms of MCA and supraclinoid segment of ICA compared to cavernous and paraclinoid localization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Double barrel extracranial to intracranial bypass between superficial temporal artery and cortical M4 branches of MCA allows for sufficient revascularization and lower risks of ischemic complications following subsequent ICA occlusion for giant aneurysm. A personalized approach to choice of acceptor arteries taking into account localization of aneurysm and natural collateral circulation is necessary to achieve good functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":24032,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","volume":"89 5","pages":"16-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20258905116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Deconstructive interventions with exclusion of the parent artery are one of the possible methods of treatment for giant and fusiform aneurysms of cerebral arteries if aneurysm occlusion with coils or insertion of flow-diverting stents are technically impossible. Such interventions are associated with high risks of stroke. In such cases, surgical revascularization with double barrel extra-intracranial bypass may be advisable to reduce the risks of ischemic complications, perioperative mortality and improve long-term neurological outcomes.

Material and methods: The study included 25 patients with large and giant aneurysms of internal carotid (ICA) and middle cerebral arteries (MCA). All ones underwent double barrel bypass surgery with subsequent exclusion of aneurysm by endovascular or open method between 2015 and 2025.

Results: The median follow-up was 11 [6; 25] months. Total exclusion of aneurysm was achieved in 24 (96%) patients. Ischemic complications occurred in 7 (28%) patients. The causes of ischemic complications were different: insufficient revascularization (n=3); EICMA thrombosis (n=1); ischemia in perforator basin (n=3). The risk of ischemic complications was higher in patients with aneurysms of MCA and supraclinoid segment of ICA compared to cavernous and paraclinoid localization.

Conclusion: Double barrel extracranial to intracranial bypass between superficial temporal artery and cortical M4 branches of MCA allows for sufficient revascularization and lower risks of ischemic complications following subsequent ICA occlusion for giant aneurysm. A personalized approach to choice of acceptor arteries taking into account localization of aneurysm and natural collateral circulation is necessary to achieve good functional outcomes.

双颅外微血管吻合术在颈内动脉、大脑中动脉巨动脉瘤解构术中的应用
背景:排除母动脉的解构性介入治疗是治疗脑动脉巨动脉瘤和梭状动脉瘤的可能方法之一,如果用线圈闭塞动脉瘤或置入分流支架在技术上是不可能的。这些干预措施与中风的高风险有关。在这种情况下,双管颅内外旁路手术血运重建术可能是可取的,以减少缺血性并发症的风险,围手术期死亡率和改善长期神经预后。材料和方法:本研究纳入25例颈内动脉(ICA)和大脑中动脉(MCA)大动脉瘤和巨动脉瘤患者。2015年至2025年间,所有患者均行双管搭桥手术,并经血管内或开放方法排除动脉瘤。结果:中位随访时间为11 [6];25)个月。24例(96%)患者完全排除了动脉瘤。7例(28%)患者出现缺血性并发症。缺血性并发症的原因不同:血运重建不足(n=3);EICMA血栓形成(n=1);穿支盆缺血(n=3)。与海绵状和线旁定位相比,MCA和ICA的线上段动脉瘤发生缺血性并发症的风险更高。结论:颞浅动脉与MCA皮层M4支之间的双管颅外-颅内旁路术可实现充分的血运重建,降低巨大动脉瘤ICA闭塞后缺血性并发症的风险。考虑到动脉瘤的定位和自然侧支循环,个性化的选择受体动脉的方法对于获得良好的功能结果是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Scientific and practical peer-reviewed journal. This publication covers the theoretical, practical and organizational problems of modern neurosurgery, the latest advances in the treatment of various diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system. Founded in 1937. English version of the journal translates from Russian version since #1/2013.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信