Immediate supraphysiologic load bearing of the spine appears safe after gunshot-related spinal cord injury: a case-control study

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hirofumi Kusumoto, Isabel M. Alvarez, Dudley Fukunaga, Sean D. Dreyer, Kevin W. Rolfe
{"title":"Immediate supraphysiologic load bearing of the spine appears safe after gunshot-related spinal cord injury: a case-control study","authors":"Hirofumi Kusumoto, Isabel M. Alvarez, Dudley Fukunaga, Sean D. Dreyer, Kevin W. Rolfe","doi":"10.1038/s41393-025-01129-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Retrospective case-control. To evaluate if early resistance training in the context of gunshot spinal cord injury is associated with neurologic decline or need for secondary surgery for a new neurological deficit or spinal deformity correction. A rehabilitation center in southern California. A retrospective review of 114 patients from a national spinal cord injury rehabilitation center was conducted. Patients were allocated to two groups: those who initiated resistance training exercises (e.g. free weight or weight machine exercises, resistance band exercises, or ergometer use on a resistance setting) within three weeks of date of injury and those who began after three weeks. Primary endpoints included change in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade and need for spinal surgery for any reason following resistance training exercises completed during the acute inpatient rehabilitation stay. Mean follow up interval was 2.5 ± 0.3 years for the entire study population. No patients sustained a neurologic decline or required secondary surgery for late deformity correction or any other reason regardless of time to resistance training initiation. There was no difference in ASIA grade improvement rates across either group. Immediate resistance training as part of a rehabilitation regimen for gunshot spinal cord injury appears safe.","PeriodicalId":21976,"journal":{"name":"Spinal cord","volume":"63 12","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal cord","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-025-01129-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retrospective case-control. To evaluate if early resistance training in the context of gunshot spinal cord injury is associated with neurologic decline or need for secondary surgery for a new neurological deficit or spinal deformity correction. A rehabilitation center in southern California. A retrospective review of 114 patients from a national spinal cord injury rehabilitation center was conducted. Patients were allocated to two groups: those who initiated resistance training exercises (e.g. free weight or weight machine exercises, resistance band exercises, or ergometer use on a resistance setting) within three weeks of date of injury and those who began after three weeks. Primary endpoints included change in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade and need for spinal surgery for any reason following resistance training exercises completed during the acute inpatient rehabilitation stay. Mean follow up interval was 2.5 ± 0.3 years for the entire study population. No patients sustained a neurologic decline or required secondary surgery for late deformity correction or any other reason regardless of time to resistance training initiation. There was no difference in ASIA grade improvement rates across either group. Immediate resistance training as part of a rehabilitation regimen for gunshot spinal cord injury appears safe.
一项病例对照研究表明,在枪击相关的脊髓损伤后,脊柱的即时超生理负荷似乎是安全的。
研究设计:回顾性病例对照。目的:评估在枪弹脊髓损伤的情况下,早期阻力训练是否与神经功能下降或需要二次手术治疗新的神经功能缺损或脊柱畸形矫正有关。背景:南加州的一个康复中心。方法:对某国家级脊髓损伤康复中心收治的114例患者进行回顾性分析。患者被分为两组:一组在受伤后三周内开始进行阻力训练(如自由举重或举重机练习,阻力带练习,或在阻力设置下使用劳力计),另一组在三周后开始。主要终点包括美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)分级的变化,以及在急性住院康复期间完成阻力训练后因任何原因需要进行脊柱手术。结果:整个研究人群的平均随访时间为2.5±0.3年。无论阻力训练开始的时间长短,没有患者持续神经功能下降或因后期畸形矫正或任何其他原因需要二次手术。两组间亚洲分级改善率无差异。结论:立即抗阻训练作为枪伤脊髓损伤康复方案的一部分是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spinal cord
Spinal cord 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
142
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Spinal Cord is a specialised, international journal that has been publishing spinal cord related manuscripts since 1963. It appears monthly, online and in print, and accepts contributions on spinal cord anatomy, physiology, management of injury and disease, and the quality of life and life circumstances of people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord is multi-disciplinary and publishes contributions across the entire spectrum of research ranging from basic science to applied clinical research. It focuses on high quality original research, systematic reviews and narrative reviews. Spinal Cord''s sister journal Spinal Cord Series and Cases: Clinical Management in Spinal Cord Disorders publishes high quality case reports, small case series, pilot and retrospective studies perspectives, Pulse survey articles, Point-couterpoint articles, correspondences and book reviews. It specialises in material that addresses all aspects of life for persons with spinal cord injuries or disorders. For more information, please see the aims and scope of Spinal Cord Series and Cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书