Jeffrey R Nagel, Wouter Driessen, Erik Groot Jebbink, Michel Versluis, Michel M P J Reijnen
{"title":"Active sac management for prevention of type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair.","authors":"Jeffrey R Nagel, Wouter Driessen, Erik Groot Jebbink, Michel Versluis, Michel M P J Reijnen","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Type II endoleaks (T2EL) remain the most common complication after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Aneurysm sac regression is a predictor for better treatment outcomes compared to sac stability and growth. T2EL are associated with aneurysm sac regression and prophylactic embolization of the sac or side branches may result in lower T2EL incidence. This review aims to assess the current evidence on whether prophylactic treatment strategies provide improved clinical outcomes after EVAR. <i>Materials and methods:</i> A systematic search was performed of the Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science databases. Original studies reporting prophylactic embolization to prevent endoleaks were included and a meta-analysis was performed on important clinical outcome parameters; T2EL incidence, sac remodelling and T2EL related reinterventions. <i>Results:</i> A total of 1,870 publications were identified. After screening and quality assessment by two reviewers, data were extracted from 29 studies and analysed. T2EL incidence was significantly lower in the embolization group; odds ratio 0.29 [0.19-0.45, 95% confidence interval] at 6 months, 0.20 [0.13-0.31] at 12 months and 0.28 [0.14-0.55] at 24 months. Sac growth was significantly lower in the embolization group with odds ratios of 0.08 [0.01-0.59], 0.16 [0.05-0.53] and 0.24 [0.11-0.52] at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Sac shrinkage was significantly higher in the embolization group with odds ratios of 0.42 [0.28-0.63], 0.49 [0.32-0.77] and 0.28 [0.16-0.50] at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Reintervention rates were lower in the embolization group, although not statistically significant. <i>Conclusions:</i> The results from this review and meta-analysis show that prophylactic embolization, either through non-selective sac filling or selective side branch embolization, result in better clinical outcomes at 6, 12 and 24 months. Prophylactic embolization seems promising in increasing sac regression rates and reducing T2EL incidence, but more data about other clinical outcome parameters is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Type II endoleaks (T2EL) remain the most common complication after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Aneurysm sac regression is a predictor for better treatment outcomes compared to sac stability and growth. T2EL are associated with aneurysm sac regression and prophylactic embolization of the sac or side branches may result in lower T2EL incidence. This review aims to assess the current evidence on whether prophylactic treatment strategies provide improved clinical outcomes after EVAR. Materials and methods: A systematic search was performed of the Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science databases. Original studies reporting prophylactic embolization to prevent endoleaks were included and a meta-analysis was performed on important clinical outcome parameters; T2EL incidence, sac remodelling and T2EL related reinterventions. Results: A total of 1,870 publications were identified. After screening and quality assessment by two reviewers, data were extracted from 29 studies and analysed. T2EL incidence was significantly lower in the embolization group; odds ratio 0.29 [0.19-0.45, 95% confidence interval] at 6 months, 0.20 [0.13-0.31] at 12 months and 0.28 [0.14-0.55] at 24 months. Sac growth was significantly lower in the embolization group with odds ratios of 0.08 [0.01-0.59], 0.16 [0.05-0.53] and 0.24 [0.11-0.52] at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Sac shrinkage was significantly higher in the embolization group with odds ratios of 0.42 [0.28-0.63], 0.49 [0.32-0.77] and 0.28 [0.16-0.50] at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Reintervention rates were lower in the embolization group, although not statistically significant. Conclusions: The results from this review and meta-analysis show that prophylactic embolization, either through non-selective sac filling or selective side branch embolization, result in better clinical outcomes at 6, 12 and 24 months. Prophylactic embolization seems promising in increasing sac regression rates and reducing T2EL incidence, but more data about other clinical outcome parameters is required.
背景:II型内漏(T2EL)仍然是血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)后最常见的并发症。与动脉瘤囊稳定性和生长相比,动脉瘤囊消退是更好的治疗结果的预测因子。T2EL与动脉瘤囊消退有关,预防性栓塞动脉瘤囊或侧分支可降低T2EL的发生率。本综述旨在评估目前关于预防性治疗策略是否能改善EVAR后临床结果的证据。材料和方法:系统检索了Scopus、PubMed和Web of Science数据库。纳入了报道预防性栓塞预防内漏的原始研究,并对重要的临床结局参数进行了荟萃分析;T2EL发病率、囊重构和T2EL相关再干预。结果:共发现1870篇文献。经过两位审稿人的筛选和质量评估,从29项研究中提取数据并进行分析。栓塞组T2EL发生率明显降低;6个月时优势比为0.29[0.19-0.45,95%可信区间],12个月时优势比为0.20[0.13-0.31],24个月时优势比为0.28[0.14-0.55]。栓塞组在6个月、12个月和24个月时囊生长明显降低,比值比分别为0.08[0.01-0.59]、0.16[0.05-0.53]和0.24[0.11-0.52]。栓塞组在6个月、12个月和24个月时囊袋收缩率显著高于栓塞组,比值比分别为0.42[0.28-0.63]、0.49[0.32-0.77]和0.28[0.16-0.50]。栓塞组的再干预率较低,但无统计学意义。结论:本综述和荟萃分析的结果显示,预防性栓塞,无论是通过非选择性囊腔填充还是选择性侧支栓塞,在6、12和24个月时均可获得更好的临床结果。预防性栓塞似乎有希望增加囊退化率和降低T2EL发生率,但需要更多关于其他临床结果参数的数据。
期刊介绍:
Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology.
The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation.
Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.