The impact of changes to work circumstances enforced by COVID-19 on anxiety: a systematic review.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Stefania D'Angelo, Elena Zaballa, Georgia Ntani, Ilse Bloom, Karen Walker-Bone
{"title":"The impact of changes to work circumstances enforced by COVID-19 on anxiety: a systematic review.","authors":"Stefania D'Angelo, Elena Zaballa, Georgia Ntani, Ilse Bloom, Karen Walker-Bone","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02950-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic enforced changes on employment circumstances for all workers but older workers experiencing job loss are less likely to return to work than younger individuals. Under normal circumstances, job loss is a well-recognised risk factor for poor mental health, while it is unclear whether working from home is beneficial or harmful to mental health. We systematically reviewed the literature to explore the association between enforced changes in employment (job loss, working from home or being furloughed) and anxiety in the adult population, with a particular focus on older workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol was registered in June 2021 in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycInfo and CINAHL (January 2020-July 2023) databases for studies including older adults (some of the study sample were workers aged over 50 years). Results were presented by narrative review, complemented by a vote-counting technique and effect direction plots to summarise the relationship between exposures and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight studies from several countries met the inclusion criteria, including 39 cross-sectional and nine longitudinal studies. The prevalence of anxiety varied between studies due to different tools and cut-offs chosen, reaching as high as 63% in one study. The vote-counting method showed convincing evidence that job loss since lockdown negatively impacted anxiety overall and among people aged 50 and over. Inconsistent results were observed across studies investigating the effect of working from home or furlough on anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disruption of employment during the pandemic and related lockdowns has increased anxiety levels in the adult population and among older workers. More research is needed to know how persistent these effects are and to identify strategies to support those most affected.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>The protocol of the systematic review was registered in June 2021 in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (PROSPERO: CRD42021260499), and it is provided as supporting information (Additional File 1).</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"195"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02950-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic enforced changes on employment circumstances for all workers but older workers experiencing job loss are less likely to return to work than younger individuals. Under normal circumstances, job loss is a well-recognised risk factor for poor mental health, while it is unclear whether working from home is beneficial or harmful to mental health. We systematically reviewed the literature to explore the association between enforced changes in employment (job loss, working from home or being furloughed) and anxiety in the adult population, with a particular focus on older workers.

Methods: The protocol was registered in June 2021 in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycInfo and CINAHL (January 2020-July 2023) databases for studies including older adults (some of the study sample were workers aged over 50 years). Results were presented by narrative review, complemented by a vote-counting technique and effect direction plots to summarise the relationship between exposures and anxiety.

Results: Forty-eight studies from several countries met the inclusion criteria, including 39 cross-sectional and nine longitudinal studies. The prevalence of anxiety varied between studies due to different tools and cut-offs chosen, reaching as high as 63% in one study. The vote-counting method showed convincing evidence that job loss since lockdown negatively impacted anxiety overall and among people aged 50 and over. Inconsistent results were observed across studies investigating the effect of working from home or furlough on anxiety.

Conclusion: Disruption of employment during the pandemic and related lockdowns has increased anxiety levels in the adult population and among older workers. More research is needed to know how persistent these effects are and to identify strategies to support those most affected.

Systematic review registration: The protocol of the systematic review was registered in June 2021 in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (PROSPERO: CRD42021260499), and it is provided as supporting information (Additional File 1).

COVID-19导致的工作环境变化对焦虑的影响:一项系统综述。
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行迫使所有工人的就业环境发生变化,但失业的老年工人重返工作岗位的可能性低于年轻人。在正常情况下,失业是导致心理健康状况不佳的一个公认的风险因素,而在家工作对心理健康是有益还是有害尚不清楚。我们系统地回顾了文献,以探讨就业中的强制性变化(失业、在家工作或被休假)与成年人焦虑之间的关系,并特别关注老年工人。方法:该方案于2021年6月在国际前瞻性系统评价注册数据库中注册。我们检索了Medline, Embase, PsycInfo和CINAHL(2020年1月- 2023年7月)数据库,以寻找包括老年人的研究(一些研究样本是50岁以上的工人)。结果以叙述回顾的方式呈现,辅以选票计数技术和效果方向图来总结暴露与焦虑之间的关系。结果:来自多个国家的48项研究符合纳入标准,包括39项横断面研究和9项纵向研究。由于选择了不同的工具和截断值,不同研究之间的焦虑患病率有所不同,在一项研究中高达63%。计票方法显示了令人信服的证据,表明自封锁以来失业对整体以及50岁及以上人群的焦虑产生了负面影响。在调查在家工作或休假对焦虑的影响的研究中,观察到不一致的结果。结论:大流行期间就业中断和相关的封锁增加了成年人口和老年工人的焦虑水平。需要更多的研究来了解这些影响的持久性,并确定支持受影响最严重的人的策略。系统综述注册:该系统综述的方案已于2021年6月在国际前瞻性系统综述注册数据库(PROSPERO: CRD42021260499)中注册,并作为支持信息提供(附加文件1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信