Disparities in Allostatic Load Among Different Races: A Comprehensive Scoping Review.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Olanike Gloria Olowokere, Olutola Esther Olasehinde, Titilayo Ifeoluwa Bisi-Adeniyi, Abimbola Fatima Onyia, Opeyemi Christiana De Campos, Oluwakemi Anuoluwapo Rotimi, Solomon Oladapo Rotimi
{"title":"Disparities in Allostatic Load Among Different Races: A Comprehensive Scoping Review.","authors":"Olanike Gloria Olowokere, Olutola Esther Olasehinde, Titilayo Ifeoluwa Bisi-Adeniyi, Abimbola Fatima Onyia, Opeyemi Christiana De Campos, Oluwakemi Anuoluwapo Rotimi, Solomon Oladapo Rotimi","doi":"10.1007/s40615-025-02697-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allostatic load measures the cumulative stress, and it varies across populations. Its accurate measurement among racial groups is essential for understanding the effects of chronic stress on health. This review is aimed at investigating disparities in allostatic load between races and exploring the underlying mechanisms driving these disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of literature was conducted, resulting in the inclusion of 296 relevant studies. These studies investigated a wide range of allostatic load biomarkers from the cardiovascular, metabolic, neuroendocrine, and immune systems. They involved diverse racial and ethnic populations with variations in age, gender, socioeconomic status (SES), and stress exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review revealed disparities in allostatic load biomarkers across different population groups. The extensive examination of a wide range of biomarkers in the selected studies showed systolic and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate/pulse rate, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body mass index, total cholesterol (TC), C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 (IL-6)/IL-6 receptor as the most frequently used biomarkers across populations. Socioeconomic status, age, racial discrimination, stressful life events, and adverse health outcomes were associated with allostatic load across different racial groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disparities exist in previous studies on allostatic load due to differences in biomarker inclusion, calculation methods, study types, and populations studied. In addition, the roles of factors like social determinants of health, discrimination, and constitutive factors like genetics and age were discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02697-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Allostatic load measures the cumulative stress, and it varies across populations. Its accurate measurement among racial groups is essential for understanding the effects of chronic stress on health. This review is aimed at investigating disparities in allostatic load between races and exploring the underlying mechanisms driving these disparities.

Methods: A systematic search of literature was conducted, resulting in the inclusion of 296 relevant studies. These studies investigated a wide range of allostatic load biomarkers from the cardiovascular, metabolic, neuroendocrine, and immune systems. They involved diverse racial and ethnic populations with variations in age, gender, socioeconomic status (SES), and stress exposure.

Results: The review revealed disparities in allostatic load biomarkers across different population groups. The extensive examination of a wide range of biomarkers in the selected studies showed systolic and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate/pulse rate, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body mass index, total cholesterol (TC), C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 (IL-6)/IL-6 receptor as the most frequently used biomarkers across populations. Socioeconomic status, age, racial discrimination, stressful life events, and adverse health outcomes were associated with allostatic load across different racial groups.

Conclusion: Disparities exist in previous studies on allostatic load due to differences in biomarker inclusion, calculation methods, study types, and populations studied. In addition, the roles of factors like social determinants of health, discrimination, and constitutive factors like genetics and age were discussed.

不同种族间适应负荷的差异:一项全面的范围综述。
背景:适应负荷测量的是累积应力,它在不同的人群中是不同的。它在种族群体中的准确测量对于理解慢性压力对健康的影响至关重要。这篇综述的目的是调查种族之间在适应负荷方面的差异,并探索导致这些差异的潜在机制。方法:系统检索文献,纳入相关研究296篇。这些研究调查了来自心血管、代谢、神经内分泌和免疫系统的广泛的适应负荷生物标志物。他们涉及不同种族和民族的人群,年龄、性别、社会经济地位(SES)和压力暴露程度各不相同。结果:该综述揭示了不同人群在适应负荷生物标志物方面的差异。在选定的研究中,对广泛的生物标志物进行了广泛的检查,发现收缩压和舒张压(DBP)、心率/脉搏率、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、体重指数、总胆固醇(TC)、c反应蛋白和白细胞介素6 (IL-6)/IL-6受体是人群中最常用的生物标志物。不同种族群体的社会经济地位、年龄、种族歧视、压力生活事件和不良健康结果与适应负荷相关。结论:由于生物标志物的包含、计算方法、研究类型和研究人群的差异,以往关于适应负荷的研究存在差异。此外,还讨论了健康的社会决定因素、歧视以及遗传和年龄等构成因素等因素的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信