Intersectional Bias in Healthcare-The Inequity Borne by the Patients: A Qualitative Study.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Alicia Böthun, Anncristine Fjellman-Wiklund, Fredrik Hellström, Britt-Marie Stålnacke, Birgitta Häggman-Henrikson, Justin Durham, Anna Lövgren
{"title":"Intersectional Bias in Healthcare-The Inequity Borne by the Patients: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Alicia Böthun, Anncristine Fjellman-Wiklund, Fredrik Hellström, Britt-Marie Stålnacke, Birgitta Häggman-Henrikson, Justin Durham, Anna Lövgren","doi":"10.1111/joor.70088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Care should be neutral and equal, but normative beliefs may impact the interaction between patients and healthcare professionals in pain management.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore how patients with jaw and neck pain perceive pain management and the interaction with healthcare professionals in relation to intersectionality, with a specific focus on gender.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Recruitment was performed at a specialist dentistry clinic in Sweden. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18-70 years, reporting jaw and neck pain and understanding the Swedish language. Exclusion criteria were rheumatic disease, temporomandibular joint arthralgia or arthritis. Using purposive sampling, 16 patients (11 women) aged 19-56 were interviewed using individual semi-structured interviews. The analysis was performed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis resulted in the theme: 'Intersectional bias in healthcare - the inequity borne by the patients', with five subthemes that entailed different types of bias related to the participants' personal characteristics and their interaction with healthcare professionals. Health-related stigmata was one subtheme described among participants, resulting in labelling and burden in the encounter. Other subthemes also described bias in relation to biological differences among pain patients and patients not being taken seriously due to, for example, female gender and younger age. Two subthemes also described bias in relation to the healthcare professionals' gender and age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Normative beliefs have a negative impact on the interaction between patients and healthcare professionals in pain management. Since patient-provider interaction should be neutral and equal, intersectional bias should be acknowledged to prevent health and care inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Care should be neutral and equal, but normative beliefs may impact the interaction between patients and healthcare professionals in pain management.

Objectives: To explore how patients with jaw and neck pain perceive pain management and the interaction with healthcare professionals in relation to intersectionality, with a specific focus on gender.

Methods: Recruitment was performed at a specialist dentistry clinic in Sweden. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18-70 years, reporting jaw and neck pain and understanding the Swedish language. Exclusion criteria were rheumatic disease, temporomandibular joint arthralgia or arthritis. Using purposive sampling, 16 patients (11 women) aged 19-56 were interviewed using individual semi-structured interviews. The analysis was performed using thematic analysis.

Results: The analysis resulted in the theme: 'Intersectional bias in healthcare - the inequity borne by the patients', with five subthemes that entailed different types of bias related to the participants' personal characteristics and their interaction with healthcare professionals. Health-related stigmata was one subtheme described among participants, resulting in labelling and burden in the encounter. Other subthemes also described bias in relation to biological differences among pain patients and patients not being taken seriously due to, for example, female gender and younger age. Two subthemes also described bias in relation to the healthcare professionals' gender and age.

Conclusion: Normative beliefs have a negative impact on the interaction between patients and healthcare professionals in pain management. Since patient-provider interaction should be neutral and equal, intersectional bias should be acknowledged to prevent health and care inequalities.

医疗保健中的交叉偏倚——由患者承担的不公平:一项定性研究。
背景:护理应该是中立和平等的,但规范性信念可能会影响患者和医疗保健专业人员在疼痛管理中的互动。目的:探讨颌骨和颈部疼痛患者如何感知疼痛管理以及与医疗保健专业人员的互动,并特别关注性别。方法:招募在瑞典的一家专科牙科诊所进行。纳入标准为年龄在18-70岁之间,报告颌骨和颈部疼痛且懂瑞典语的患者。排除标准为风湿病、颞下颌关节痛或关节炎。采用有目的抽样,对16例19-56岁的患者(11名女性)进行了半结构化访谈。采用主题分析法进行分析。结果:分析得出的主题是:“医疗保健中的交叉偏差-患者承担的不公平”,并有五个子主题,涉及与参与者的个人特征以及他们与医疗保健专业人员的互动有关的不同类型的偏差。与健康有关的耻辱感是参与者描述的一个分主题,导致了接触中的标签和负担。其他子主题还描述了与疼痛患者之间的生物学差异有关的偏见,以及由于女性性别和年龄较小而未被认真对待的患者。两个分主题还描述了与保健专业人员的性别和年龄有关的偏见。结论:规范信念对疼痛管理中患者与医护人员的互动有负向影响。由于患者与提供者之间的互动应该是中立和平等的,因此应承认交叉偏见,以防止保健和护理不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of oral rehabilitation
Journal of oral rehabilitation 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function. Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology. The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信