Steven A. Wakelin , Charlotte Armstrong , Syaliny Ganasamurthy , Kathryn Wigley , Celine Mercier
{"title":"Comparison of primer sets for short-read NGS-based characterisation of oomycete communities","authors":"Steven A. Wakelin , Charlotte Armstrong , Syaliny Ganasamurthy , Kathryn Wigley , Celine Mercier","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oomycetes have diverse ecological roles spanning threats to food security to vital contributors in nutrient cycling and biological control. Despite their importance, they are often overlooked in environmental microbiome studies. We evaluated several primer sets for their ability to characterize oomycete communities in eDNA samples. The ITS1/3oo primer set performed best among those evaluated in our single-protocol eDNA survey, returning high oomycete richness and broader taxonomic coverage; we note this reflects performance under our experimental conditions rather than an absolute, universally optimal primer. For broader eukarya coverage, the 18S rRNA primer set from the Earth Microbiome Programme outperformed the COI-based primers tested. Although these broad-coverage primer sets detected a wide range of oomycetes, their performance in oomycete-specific coverage was not as strong as oomycete-targeted primer sets. Evaluation of the primer sets were undertaken using eDNA samples collected from soil in which <em>Kunzea robusta</em> (kānuka; Myrtaceae), and <em>Phormium tenax</em> (harakeke; Asphodelaceae) were cultivated. An average of 52 and 54 oomycete ASVs, respectively, were associated with the rhizosphere of these plants, spanning <em>Haptoglossa, Alanopsis, Aphanomyces, Achyla, Pythium, Phytopythium, Globiosporangium, Phytophthora, Myzocytiopsis, Eurychasma</em> and <em>Lagendum</em> lineages. Based on evaluation of a range of oomycete targeting primers on real-world samples, we are able to provide recommendations for primer sets that maximise oomycete detection and provide the best balance of specificity and coverage for eDNA-based community profiling. These primers can be used to capture the diversity and ecological roles of oomycetes in natural and managed ecosystems, enabling more accurate assessments of their impact on plant health, soil and nutrient dynamics, as well as deepening our understanding of the diversity and distribution of this understudied clade of microbial life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiological methods","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 107293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiological methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016770122500209X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Oomycetes have diverse ecological roles spanning threats to food security to vital contributors in nutrient cycling and biological control. Despite their importance, they are often overlooked in environmental microbiome studies. We evaluated several primer sets for their ability to characterize oomycete communities in eDNA samples. The ITS1/3oo primer set performed best among those evaluated in our single-protocol eDNA survey, returning high oomycete richness and broader taxonomic coverage; we note this reflects performance under our experimental conditions rather than an absolute, universally optimal primer. For broader eukarya coverage, the 18S rRNA primer set from the Earth Microbiome Programme outperformed the COI-based primers tested. Although these broad-coverage primer sets detected a wide range of oomycetes, their performance in oomycete-specific coverage was not as strong as oomycete-targeted primer sets. Evaluation of the primer sets were undertaken using eDNA samples collected from soil in which Kunzea robusta (kānuka; Myrtaceae), and Phormium tenax (harakeke; Asphodelaceae) were cultivated. An average of 52 and 54 oomycete ASVs, respectively, were associated with the rhizosphere of these plants, spanning Haptoglossa, Alanopsis, Aphanomyces, Achyla, Pythium, Phytopythium, Globiosporangium, Phytophthora, Myzocytiopsis, Eurychasma and Lagendum lineages. Based on evaluation of a range of oomycete targeting primers on real-world samples, we are able to provide recommendations for primer sets that maximise oomycete detection and provide the best balance of specificity and coverage for eDNA-based community profiling. These primers can be used to capture the diversity and ecological roles of oomycetes in natural and managed ecosystems, enabling more accurate assessments of their impact on plant health, soil and nutrient dynamics, as well as deepening our understanding of the diversity and distribution of this understudied clade of microbial life.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Microbiological Methods publishes scholarly and original articles, notes and review articles. These articles must include novel and/or state-of-the-art methods, or significant improvements to existing methods. Novel and innovative applications of current methods that are validated and useful will also be published. JMM strives for scholarship, innovation and excellence. This demands scientific rigour, the best available methods and technologies, correctly replicated experiments/tests, the inclusion of proper controls, calibrations, and the correct statistical analysis. The presentation of the data must support the interpretation of the method/approach.
All aspects of microbiology are covered, except virology. These include agricultural microbiology, applied and environmental microbiology, bioassays, bioinformatics, biotechnology, biochemical microbiology, clinical microbiology, diagnostics, food monitoring and quality control microbiology, microbial genetics and genomics, geomicrobiology, microbiome methods regardless of habitat, high through-put sequencing methods and analysis, microbial pathogenesis and host responses, metabolomics, metagenomics, metaproteomics, microbial ecology and diversity, microbial physiology, microbial ultra-structure, microscopic and imaging methods, molecular microbiology, mycology, novel mathematical microbiology and modelling, parasitology, plant-microbe interactions, protein markers/profiles, proteomics, pyrosequencing, public health microbiology, radioisotopes applied to microbiology, robotics applied to microbiological methods,rumen microbiology, microbiological methods for space missions and extreme environments, sampling methods and samplers, soil and sediment microbiology, transcriptomics, veterinary microbiology, sero-diagnostics and typing/identification.