José Evando da Silva-Filho, Aryanna Celly Rodrigues-Lima, Kayo Lúcio Silveira-Fernandes, Camille de Sousa Veloso, João Paulo Viana Braga, Sandra Régia Albuquerque Ximenes, Elilton Cavalcante Pinheiro-Júnior, Danielle Frota de Albuquerque, Eduardo Diogo Gurgel-Filho
{"title":"Cemental Tear: Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of Clinical and Imaging Features with a Proposed Diagnostic Framework.","authors":"José Evando da Silva-Filho, Aryanna Celly Rodrigues-Lima, Kayo Lúcio Silveira-Fernandes, Camille de Sousa Veloso, João Paulo Viana Braga, Sandra Régia Albuquerque Ximenes, Elilton Cavalcante Pinheiro-Júnior, Danielle Frota de Albuquerque, Eduardo Diogo Gurgel-Filho","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2025.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cemental tear (CT) is a rare condition with poorly understood prevalence, etiology, and clinical presentation, often mimicking vertical root fractures or endodontic-periodontal lesions. This review aimed to synthesize current evidence on CT and propose a diagnostic framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in Cochrane Library, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and grey literature (Google Scholar, ProQuest) for case reports (2000-2024). Inclusion required full clinical and radiographic documentation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Data on epidemiological, clinical, and imaging features were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies reported 24 patients and 39 teeth. Methodological quality was heterogeneous, mostly with moderate risk of bias. CT mainly affected single-rooted teeth, especially incisors (46.1%), in older patients (mean 56.2 years). Frequent clinical findings included deep periodontal pockets (75%), mobility (60%), and fistulas (40%). Radiographically, bone loss (33.3%), radiopaque fragments (28.2%), and lateral radiolucencies (23.1%) were noted. Cone-beam computed tomography proved crucial for detecting buccal/lingual fragments. Histopathology confirmed cementum detachment, often infection-related. Treatments ranged from fragment removal to extraction, with prognosis linked to early diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CT is rare and challenging, best identified with high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography and integrated clinical evaluation. Early, precise diagnosis guides prognosis, with conservative fragment removal recommended when feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2025.10.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Cemental tear (CT) is a rare condition with poorly understood prevalence, etiology, and clinical presentation, often mimicking vertical root fractures or endodontic-periodontal lesions. This review aimed to synthesize current evidence on CT and propose a diagnostic framework.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in Cochrane Library, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and grey literature (Google Scholar, ProQuest) for case reports (2000-2024). Inclusion required full clinical and radiographic documentation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Data on epidemiological, clinical, and imaging features were extracted.
Results: Twenty studies reported 24 patients and 39 teeth. Methodological quality was heterogeneous, mostly with moderate risk of bias. CT mainly affected single-rooted teeth, especially incisors (46.1%), in older patients (mean 56.2 years). Frequent clinical findings included deep periodontal pockets (75%), mobility (60%), and fistulas (40%). Radiographically, bone loss (33.3%), radiopaque fragments (28.2%), and lateral radiolucencies (23.1%) were noted. Cone-beam computed tomography proved crucial for detecting buccal/lingual fragments. Histopathology confirmed cementum detachment, often infection-related. Treatments ranged from fragment removal to extraction, with prognosis linked to early diagnosis.
Conclusions: CT is rare and challenging, best identified with high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography and integrated clinical evaluation. Early, precise diagnosis guides prognosis, with conservative fragment removal recommended when feasible.
骨水泥撕裂(CT)是一种罕见的疾病,其患病率、病因和临床表现尚不清楚,通常与牙根垂直骨折或牙髓-牙周病变相似。本综述旨在综合目前CT上的证据并提出一个诊断框架。方法:综合检索Cochrane Library、LILACS、PubMed、ScienceDirect、Scopus、Web of Science和灰色文献(谷歌Scholar、ProQuest) 2000-2024年的病例报告。纳入需要完整的临床和影像学文件。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的检查表评估偏倚风险。提取流行病学、临床和影像学资料。结果:20篇研究报告24例患者,39颗牙。方法学质量参差不齐,大多存在中等偏倚风险。高龄患者(平均56.2岁)CT主要影响单根牙,尤其是门牙(46.1%)。常见的临床表现包括深度牙周袋(75%)、活动(60%)和瘘管(40%)。x线摄影显示骨质丢失(33.3%)、不透光碎片(28.2%)和侧位透光(23.1%)。锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)被证明是检测颊/舌碎片的关键。组织病理学证实骨质脱离,常与感染有关。治疗范围从碎片去除到提取,预后与早期诊断有关。结论:CT罕见且具有挑战性,最好通过高分辨率CBCT和综合临床评估来识别。早期准确诊断指导预后,可行时建议保守切除碎片。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.