Influence of the Inferior Turbinate on the Accuracy of Superior Maxillary Repositioning in Le Fort I Osteotomy With/Without Adjunctive Technique.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Daisuke Yamamoto, Nobuyoshi Tomomatsu, Taishi Nakamura, Namiaki Takahara, Yasuhiro Kurasawa, Hiroyuki Yoshitake
{"title":"Influence of the Inferior Turbinate on the Accuracy of Superior Maxillary Repositioning in Le Fort I Osteotomy With/Without Adjunctive Technique.","authors":"Daisuke Yamamoto, Nobuyoshi Tomomatsu, Taishi Nakamura, Namiaki Takahara, Yasuhiro Kurasawa, Hiroyuki Yoshitake","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000012064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previously, the authors reported that the amount of bony tissue inside the inferior nasal turbinate affects the precision of maxillary superior repositioning in conventional Le Fort I osteotomy (LFI) cases. Therefore, the authors conducted a retrospective study to examine whether adjunctive techniques such as horseshoe osteotomy or partial inferior turbinate resection could avoid interfering with the inferior nasal turbinate and nasal floor while improving the accuracy of maxillary superior repositioning in patients with well-developed bony tissue in the inferior nasal turbinate. Of the 163 patients with facial deformities who underwent conventional LFI (with maxillary elevation of 4.0-6.0 mm), most of whom also underwent bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. The conventional LFI group included 54 cases in the large bone subgroup and 73 cases in the small bone subgroup, and LFI with adjunctive technique included 15 cases in the large bone subgroup and 21 cases in the small bone subgroup. The planned or actual amount of superior repositioning was compared three-dimensionally. The accuracy of the actual maxillary repositioning was significantly better in the small bone subgroup than in the large bone subgroup in conventional LFI group (P = 0.025). In addition, the presence of an adjunctive technique influences the accuracy of maxillary superior repositioning. For patients undergoing maxillary superior repositioning (>4.0 mm) with well-developed bony tissue of inferior nasal turbinate, an adjunctive technique (horseshoe osteotomy or partial inferior turbinectomy) should be considered. This prevents interference between the inferior nasal turbinate and the maxillary bone fragments, achieving greater accuracy in maxillary repositioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000012064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previously, the authors reported that the amount of bony tissue inside the inferior nasal turbinate affects the precision of maxillary superior repositioning in conventional Le Fort I osteotomy (LFI) cases. Therefore, the authors conducted a retrospective study to examine whether adjunctive techniques such as horseshoe osteotomy or partial inferior turbinate resection could avoid interfering with the inferior nasal turbinate and nasal floor while improving the accuracy of maxillary superior repositioning in patients with well-developed bony tissue in the inferior nasal turbinate. Of the 163 patients with facial deformities who underwent conventional LFI (with maxillary elevation of 4.0-6.0 mm), most of whom also underwent bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. The conventional LFI group included 54 cases in the large bone subgroup and 73 cases in the small bone subgroup, and LFI with adjunctive technique included 15 cases in the large bone subgroup and 21 cases in the small bone subgroup. The planned or actual amount of superior repositioning was compared three-dimensionally. The accuracy of the actual maxillary repositioning was significantly better in the small bone subgroup than in the large bone subgroup in conventional LFI group (P = 0.025). In addition, the presence of an adjunctive technique influences the accuracy of maxillary superior repositioning. For patients undergoing maxillary superior repositioning (>4.0 mm) with well-developed bony tissue of inferior nasal turbinate, an adjunctive technique (horseshoe osteotomy or partial inferior turbinectomy) should be considered. This prevents interference between the inferior nasal turbinate and the maxillary bone fragments, achieving greater accuracy in maxillary repositioning.

下鼻甲对Le Fort I型截骨术中上颌再定位准确性的影响。
先前,作者报道了在常规Le Fort I型截骨术(LFI)病例中,下鼻甲内骨组织的数量会影响上颌上位再定位的准确性。因此,作者进行了回顾性研究,探讨马蹄截骨或部分下鼻甲切除等辅助技术是否可以避免对下鼻甲和鼻底的干扰,同时提高下鼻甲骨组织发育良好的患者上颌上定位的准确性。163例面部畸形患者行常规LFI(上颌抬高4.0 ~ 6.0 mm),多数同时行双侧矢状分叉支截骨术。常规LFI组大骨亚组54例,小骨亚组73例,辅助技术LFI组大骨亚组15例,小骨亚组21例。将计划的或实际的优越重新定位量进行三维比较。常规LFI组小骨亚组上颌实际再定位的准确性明显优于大骨亚组(P = 0.025)。此外,辅助技术的存在影响上颌上牙复位的准确性。对于下鼻甲骨组织发育良好的患者行上颌上位复位(>4.0 mm),应考虑采用辅助技术(马蹄截骨或部分下鼻甲切除术)。这样可以防止下鼻甲骨和上颌骨碎片之间的干扰,从而提高上颌复位的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信