Advancing postoperative mortality prediction in gastrectomy: a machine learning approach using NSQIP data.

IF 10.1 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Dong-Won Kang, Shouhao Zhou, Chanhyun Park, Russell Torres, Abhinandan Chowdhury, Suman Niranjan, Charles Vining, Colette Pameijer, Chan Shen
{"title":"Advancing postoperative mortality prediction in gastrectomy: a machine learning approach using NSQIP data.","authors":"Dong-Won Kang, Shouhao Zhou, Chanhyun Park, Russell Torres, Abhinandan Chowdhury, Suman Niranjan, Charles Vining, Colette Pameijer, Chan Shen","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000003688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate prediction of mortality risk in gastrectomy is critical to optimize surgical management and improve patient outcomes. This study aims to develop machine learning (ML) models for predicting 30-day postoperative mortality following gastrectomy and identify key predictors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the NSQIP Participant Use Data File from 2017 to 2022 to develop ML models: (1) random forest, (2) gradient-boosted tree, and (3) XGBoost model. A simple logistic regression model was further developed to compare the model prediction. We trained each model using a comprehensive set of variables available in the NSQIP data (Model C) or 17 variables included in the existing ACS NSQIP risk calculator (Model L). We used the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve to evaluate the model performance and employed SHapley Additive exPlanations algorithms on the best performing model to identify the most impactful predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7,954 patients who underwent gastrectomy, approximately 4.3% of patients died within 30 days following gastrectomy. In both Model C and Model L, the XGBoost model showed the best performance, followed by the random forest. The Model C outperformed the Model L, and all ML models outperformed simple logistic regression. In XGBoost model, preoperative blood urea nitrogen was the most important predictor, followed by age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The XGBoost model demonstrated the highest predictive performance for 30-day postoperative mortality following gastrectomy. Preoperative laboratory variables and age were key predictors. Incorporating ML-based models into clinical practice has the potential to enhance perioperative decision-making and improve patient outcomes after gastrectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000003688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate prediction of mortality risk in gastrectomy is critical to optimize surgical management and improve patient outcomes. This study aims to develop machine learning (ML) models for predicting 30-day postoperative mortality following gastrectomy and identify key predictors.

Methods: We utilized the NSQIP Participant Use Data File from 2017 to 2022 to develop ML models: (1) random forest, (2) gradient-boosted tree, and (3) XGBoost model. A simple logistic regression model was further developed to compare the model prediction. We trained each model using a comprehensive set of variables available in the NSQIP data (Model C) or 17 variables included in the existing ACS NSQIP risk calculator (Model L). We used the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve to evaluate the model performance and employed SHapley Additive exPlanations algorithms on the best performing model to identify the most impactful predictors.

Results: Of 7,954 patients who underwent gastrectomy, approximately 4.3% of patients died within 30 days following gastrectomy. In both Model C and Model L, the XGBoost model showed the best performance, followed by the random forest. The Model C outperformed the Model L, and all ML models outperformed simple logistic regression. In XGBoost model, preoperative blood urea nitrogen was the most important predictor, followed by age.

Conclusion: The XGBoost model demonstrated the highest predictive performance for 30-day postoperative mortality following gastrectomy. Preoperative laboratory variables and age were key predictors. Incorporating ML-based models into clinical practice has the potential to enhance perioperative decision-making and improve patient outcomes after gastrectomy.

推进胃切除术术后死亡率预测:使用NSQIP数据的机器学习方法。
背景:准确预测胃切除术的死亡风险对于优化手术管理和改善患者预后至关重要。本研究旨在开发预测胃切除术后30天死亡率的机器学习(ML)模型,并确定关键预测因素。方法:利用2017 - 2022年NSQIP参与者使用数据文件建立机器学习模型:(1)随机森林模型,(2)梯度增强树模型,(3)XGBoost模型。进一步建立一个简单的逻辑回归模型来比较模型的预测结果。我们使用NSQIP数据(模型C)中可用的综合变量集或现有ACS NSQIP风险计算器(模型L)中包含的17个变量来训练每个模型。我们使用接收者工作特征曲线下的面积来评估模型的性能,并在表现最佳的模型上使用SHapley加性解释算法来确定最具影响力的预测因子。结果:在7,954例接受胃切除术的患者中,约4.3%的患者在胃切除术后30天内死亡。在模型C和模型L中,XGBoost模型表现最好,其次是随机森林。模型C优于模型L,所有ML模型都优于简单逻辑回归。在XGBoost模型中,术前血尿素氮是最重要的预测因子,其次是年龄。结论:XGBoost模型对胃切除术后30天死亡率的预测效果最好。术前实验室变量和年龄是关键预测因素。将基于ml的模型纳入临床实践有可能增强围手术期决策并改善胃切除术后患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信