Impact of sample handling protocols on soft tissue attenuation coefficient and morphology.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Journal of Biomedical Optics Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-14 DOI:10.1117/1.JBO.30.10.106004
Freja Hoeier, Gavrielle R Untracht, Amanda Oester Andersen, Karina Straede, Andreas Kjaer, Peter E Andersen
{"title":"Impact of sample handling protocols on soft tissue attenuation coefficient and morphology.","authors":"Freja Hoeier, Gavrielle R Untracht, Amanda Oester Andersen, Karina Straede, Andreas Kjaer, Peter E Andersen","doi":"10.1117/1.JBO.30.10.106004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>The use of tissue attenuation coefficients as biomarkers for disease detection is rising. However, especially for <i>ex vivo</i> studies, sample handling methods can notably impact tissue optical attenuation properties, and these effects have yet to be studied in detail.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aim to compare and evaluate common methods for sample handling and assess their impact on the optical attenuation and structural properties of <i>ex vivo</i> colon tissue.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Six different handling methods were tested: Direct freezing at <math><mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>80</mn> <mo>°</mo> <mi>C</mi></mrow> </math> , slow freezing in a cryobox with and without cryopreservation media, snap freezing in isopentane, formalin fixation, and fresh tissue stored directly in phosphate-buffered saline. All samples were imaged using optical coherence tomography; images were assessed qualitatively for morphological changes and quantitatively by extracting the tissue attenuation coefficient using the Lambert-Beer law. All handling methods were compared with representative histology (hematoxylin and eosin staining and periodic acid-Schiff staining).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All sample handling methods showed a significant difference in tissue attenuation and morphology relative to the fresh tissue ( <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>≪</mo> <mn>0.0001</mn></mrow> </math> ), with frozen samples generally showing a lower attenuation coefficient, e.g., directly frozen ( <math><mrow><mn>2.0</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>1.0</mn> <mtext>  </mtext> <msup><mrow><mi>mm</mi></mrow> <mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn></mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math> ) compared with formalin-fixed ( <math><mrow><mn>2.5</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>1.3</mn> <mtext>  </mtext> <msup><mrow><mi>mm</mi></mrow> <mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn></mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math> ) and fresh tissue ( <math><mrow><mn>2.5</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>1.0</mn> <mtext>  </mtext> <msup><mrow><mi>mm</mi></mrow> <mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn></mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math> ). Formalin-fixed and snap frozen samples had the smallest effect size ( <math><mrow><mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.002</mn></mrow> </math> and <math><mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>0.09</mn></mrow> </math> , respectively). Macroscopic structural changes were also observed, including alterations to the epithelial layer and indications of goblet cell degradation for all methods but formalin fixation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding the impact of sample handling methods is critical to the accurate interpretation of morphology-based analysis. In the case of fresh tissue being unavailable, formalin-fixed and snap frozen tissue samples yield the best alternative with negligible effect sizes for colon tissue.</p>","PeriodicalId":15264,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Optics","volume":"30 10","pages":"106004"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.30.10.106004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significance: The use of tissue attenuation coefficients as biomarkers for disease detection is rising. However, especially for ex vivo studies, sample handling methods can notably impact tissue optical attenuation properties, and these effects have yet to be studied in detail.

Aim: We aim to compare and evaluate common methods for sample handling and assess their impact on the optical attenuation and structural properties of ex vivo colon tissue.

Approach: Six different handling methods were tested: Direct freezing at - 80 ° C , slow freezing in a cryobox with and without cryopreservation media, snap freezing in isopentane, formalin fixation, and fresh tissue stored directly in phosphate-buffered saline. All samples were imaged using optical coherence tomography; images were assessed qualitatively for morphological changes and quantitatively by extracting the tissue attenuation coefficient using the Lambert-Beer law. All handling methods were compared with representative histology (hematoxylin and eosin staining and periodic acid-Schiff staining).

Results: All sample handling methods showed a significant difference in tissue attenuation and morphology relative to the fresh tissue ( p 0.0001 ), with frozen samples generally showing a lower attenuation coefficient, e.g., directly frozen ( 2.0 ± 1.0    mm - 1 ) compared with formalin-fixed ( 2.5 ± 1.3    mm - 1 ) and fresh tissue ( 2.5 ± 1.0    mm - 1 ). Formalin-fixed and snap frozen samples had the smallest effect size ( δ = 0.002 and - 0.09 , respectively). Macroscopic structural changes were also observed, including alterations to the epithelial layer and indications of goblet cell degradation for all methods but formalin fixation.

Conclusions: Understanding the impact of sample handling methods is critical to the accurate interpretation of morphology-based analysis. In the case of fresh tissue being unavailable, formalin-fixed and snap frozen tissue samples yield the best alternative with negligible effect sizes for colon tissue.

样品处理方案对软组织衰减系数和形态的影响。
意义:组织衰减系数作为疾病检测的生物标志物的使用正在增加。然而,特别是在离体研究中,样品处理方法会显著影响组织的光衰减特性,这些影响尚未得到详细的研究。目的:比较和评价常用的样品处理方法,并评估其对离体结肠组织光衰减和结构特性的影响。方法:测试了六种不同的处理方法:在- 80°C直接冷冻,在冷冻箱中缓慢冷冻,有和没有冷冻保存介质,异戊烷快速冷冻,福尔马林固定,新鲜组织直接储存在磷酸盐缓冲盐水中。所有样品均采用光学相干层析成像;利用Lambert-Beer定律提取组织衰减系数,定量评估图像的形态学变化。所有处理方法与代表性组织学(苏木精和伊红染色和周期性酸-希夫染色)进行比较。结果:与新鲜组织相比,所有样品处理方法在组织衰减和形态上都有显著差异(p≪0.0001),冷冻样品的衰减系数一般较低,例如,与福尔马林固定(2.5±1.3 mm - 1)和新鲜组织(2.5±1.0 mm - 1)相比,直接冷冻(2.0±1.0 mm - 1)的衰减系数较低。福尔马林固定和速冻样品的效应值最小(分别为δ = 0.002和- 0.09)。宏观结构变化也被观察到,包括上皮层的改变和除福尔马林固定外的所有方法的杯状细胞降解迹象。结论:了解样品处理方法的影响对于准确解释基于形态学的分析至关重要。在无法获得新鲜组织的情况下,福尔马林固定和快速冷冻组织样本是结肠组织的最佳选择,其影响可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
263
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Optics publishes peer-reviewed papers on the use of modern optical technology for improved health care and biomedical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信