Challenges in Applying DNA-Binding Protein Predictors to Biological Research.

IF 4.9 2区 生物学
Graydon Cowgill, Steven Anthony Strazza, Savannah Wilson, Ranjeeta Odari, Sadia Afrin Bristy, Yongjian Qiu, Sayaka Miura
{"title":"Challenges in Applying DNA-Binding Protein Predictors to Biological Research.","authors":"Graydon Cowgill, Steven Anthony Strazza, Savannah Wilson, Ranjeeta Odari, Sadia Afrin Bristy, Yongjian Qiu, Sayaka Miura","doi":"10.3390/ijms26199785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>DNA binding proteins play a crucial role in regulating gene expression, DNA replication, and chromatin organization. While many DNA-binding proteins have been identified, many unique DNA-binding proteins in non-model organisms and recently evolved lineage- or species-specific proteins remain uncharacterized or often lack experimental validation. In addition, genetic variants may alter previously known DNA-binding proteins, leading to loss of binding ability. To address this gap, various computational tools have been developed to predict DNA-binding proteins from protein sequences or structures. Yet, their real-world utility in biological research remains uncertain. To evaluate their effectiveness, we assessed the availability and predictive performance of existing tools using five real-world case studies. We found that most tools were web-based, offering accessibility to researchers without computational expertise. However, many suffered from poor maintenance, including frequent server connection problems, input errors, and long processing times. Among the ten tools that were functional and practical, we found that prediction scores often failed to reflect incorrect outputs, and multiple methods frequently produced the same erroneous predictions. Overall, even a small number of misclassifications can significantly distort biological interpretation, indicating that current DNA-binding prediction tools are not yet sufficiently reliable for empirical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":14156,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Molecular Sciences","volume":"26 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12524727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Molecular Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199785","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

DNA binding proteins play a crucial role in regulating gene expression, DNA replication, and chromatin organization. While many DNA-binding proteins have been identified, many unique DNA-binding proteins in non-model organisms and recently evolved lineage- or species-specific proteins remain uncharacterized or often lack experimental validation. In addition, genetic variants may alter previously known DNA-binding proteins, leading to loss of binding ability. To address this gap, various computational tools have been developed to predict DNA-binding proteins from protein sequences or structures. Yet, their real-world utility in biological research remains uncertain. To evaluate their effectiveness, we assessed the availability and predictive performance of existing tools using five real-world case studies. We found that most tools were web-based, offering accessibility to researchers without computational expertise. However, many suffered from poor maintenance, including frequent server connection problems, input errors, and long processing times. Among the ten tools that were functional and practical, we found that prediction scores often failed to reflect incorrect outputs, and multiple methods frequently produced the same erroneous predictions. Overall, even a small number of misclassifications can significantly distort biological interpretation, indicating that current DNA-binding prediction tools are not yet sufficiently reliable for empirical research.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

应用dna结合蛋白预测因子在生物学研究中的挑战。
DNA结合蛋白在调节基因表达、DNA复制和染色质组织中起着至关重要的作用。虽然已经鉴定了许多dna结合蛋白,但在非模式生物和最近进化的谱系或物种特异性蛋白中,许多独特的dna结合蛋白仍然未被表征或通常缺乏实验验证。此外,遗传变异可能改变先前已知的dna结合蛋白,导致结合能力的丧失。为了解决这一差距,已经开发了各种计算工具来从蛋白质序列或结构中预测dna结合蛋白。然而,它们在生物学研究中的实际用途仍然不确定。为了评估其有效性,我们使用五个真实案例研究评估了现有工具的可用性和预测性能。我们发现大多数工具都是基于网络的,为没有计算机专业知识的研究人员提供了可访问性。然而,许多应用程序都存在维护不善的问题,包括频繁出现服务器连接问题、输入错误和处理时间过长。在十个功能和实用的工具中,我们发现预测分数经常不能反映不正确的输出,并且多种方法经常产生相同的错误预测。总的来说,即使是少量的错误分类也会严重扭曲生物学解释,这表明目前的dna结合预测工具在实证研究中还不够可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
10.70%
发文量
13472
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Molecular Sciences (ISSN 1422-0067) provides an advanced forum for chemistry, molecular physics (chemical physics and physical chemistry) and molecular biology. It publishes research articles, reviews, communications and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their theoretical and experimental results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers or the number of electronics supplementary files. For articles with computational results, the full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material (including animated pictures, videos, interactive Excel sheets, software executables and others).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信