Salivary Molecular Testing for Periodontal Pathogen Monitoring: Clinical Performance of Flexible RT-PCR Platforms in Preventive Care Settings.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Fabiana D'Urso, Federica Paladini, Mauro Pollini, Francesco Broccolo
{"title":"Salivary Molecular Testing for Periodontal Pathogen Monitoring: Clinical Performance of Flexible RT-PCR Platforms in Preventive Care Settings.","authors":"Fabiana D'Urso, Federica Paladini, Mauro Pollini, Francesco Broccolo","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15192548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to validate the clinical utility of a salivary molecular platform (Oral Predict<sup>®</sup>) for periodontal pathogen detection across preventive, therapeutic, and maintenance settings. <b>Methods:</b> A longitudinal randomized study was conducted involving 78 adults who provided saliva samples at baseline, one month, and three months after professional dental hygiene. Participants were randomized into two groups: control group (n = 39) and probiotic group with Oral Predict<sup>®</sup> probiotic supplementation (n = 39). Crude saliva was processed directly without nucleic acid extraction and analyzed by multiplex real-time PCR using either the compact Real-time PCR system or standard thermocyclers. <b>Results:</b> At baseline, <i>Fusobacterium nucleatum</i> was the most prevalent pathogen (84.6%), followed by <i>Tannerella forsythia</i> (53.8%) and <i>Porphyromonas</i> gingivalis (46.2%). The Total Pathogen Burden Score (TPBS) showed progressive increases with age, smoking, and poor oral hygiene, and was significantly higher in participants with gingival bleeding. Among individual pathogens, no significant associations were observed with periodontitis staging or grading. Professional hygiene induced mean reductions of 1-2 logs across all pathogens, with TPBS decreasing from 8.7 ± 3.2 to 4.1 ± 2.8 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). At three months, 69.2% of the control group experienced bacterial rebound, whereas 85% of probiotic users sustained or improved bacterial reductions. <b>Conclusions</b>: Salivary molecular testing provides a robust, non-invasive approach for periodontal pathogen detection, treatment monitoring, and long-term maintenance assessment. The flexibility of the Oral Predict<sup>®</sup> platform across point-of-care and laboratory settings, combined with automated interpretation, supports integration into preventive protocols and personalized periodontal care. These findings demonstrate the potential of saliva-based molecular diagnostics to shift periodontal management from reactive to predictive and precision-based strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192548","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to validate the clinical utility of a salivary molecular platform (Oral Predict®) for periodontal pathogen detection across preventive, therapeutic, and maintenance settings. Methods: A longitudinal randomized study was conducted involving 78 adults who provided saliva samples at baseline, one month, and three months after professional dental hygiene. Participants were randomized into two groups: control group (n = 39) and probiotic group with Oral Predict® probiotic supplementation (n = 39). Crude saliva was processed directly without nucleic acid extraction and analyzed by multiplex real-time PCR using either the compact Real-time PCR system or standard thermocyclers. Results: At baseline, Fusobacterium nucleatum was the most prevalent pathogen (84.6%), followed by Tannerella forsythia (53.8%) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (46.2%). The Total Pathogen Burden Score (TPBS) showed progressive increases with age, smoking, and poor oral hygiene, and was significantly higher in participants with gingival bleeding. Among individual pathogens, no significant associations were observed with periodontitis staging or grading. Professional hygiene induced mean reductions of 1-2 logs across all pathogens, with TPBS decreasing from 8.7 ± 3.2 to 4.1 ± 2.8 (p < 0.001). At three months, 69.2% of the control group experienced bacterial rebound, whereas 85% of probiotic users sustained or improved bacterial reductions. Conclusions: Salivary molecular testing provides a robust, non-invasive approach for periodontal pathogen detection, treatment monitoring, and long-term maintenance assessment. The flexibility of the Oral Predict® platform across point-of-care and laboratory settings, combined with automated interpretation, supports integration into preventive protocols and personalized periodontal care. These findings demonstrate the potential of saliva-based molecular diagnostics to shift periodontal management from reactive to predictive and precision-based strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

唾液分子检测牙周病原体监测:灵活的RT-PCR平台在预防保健设置的临床表现。
目的:本研究旨在验证唾液分子平台(Oral Predict®)在预防、治疗和维持牙周病原体检测方面的临床应用。方法:对78名成年人进行纵向随机研究,他们在基线、专业口腔卫生后1个月和3个月提供唾液样本。参与者被随机分为两组:对照组(n = 39)和益生菌组(n = 39)口服预测®益生菌补充剂。粗唾液直接处理,无需核酸提取,使用紧凑型实时荧光定量PCR系统或标准热循环仪进行多重实时荧光定量PCR分析。结果:基线时,最常见的病原菌为核梭菌(84.6%),其次为连翘单宁菌(53.8%)和牙龈卟啉单胞菌(46.2%)。总病原体负担评分(TPBS)随着年龄、吸烟和口腔卫生不良而逐渐增加,在牙龈出血的参与者中明显更高。在单个病原体中,没有观察到与牙周炎分期或分级的显著关联。职业卫生导致所有病原体平均减少1-2 log, TPBS从8.7±3.2降至4.1±2.8 (p < 0.001)。三个月后,69.2%的对照组出现了细菌反弹,而85%的益生菌使用者维持或改善了细菌减少。结论:唾液分子检测为牙周病原体检测、治疗监测和长期维持评估提供了一种可靠的、非侵入性的方法。Oral Predict®平台在护理点和实验室环境中的灵活性,结合自动口译,支持集成到预防方案和个性化牙周护理中。这些发现证明了基于唾液的分子诊断将牙周管理从反应性转变为预测性和精准性策略的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信