Kevin Guan, Andy Guan, Anwar E Ahmed, Andrew J Waters, Shyh-Han Tan, Dechang Chen
{"title":"Using Machine Learning to Create Prognostic Systems for Primary Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Kevin Guan, Andy Guan, Anwar E Ahmed, Andrew J Waters, Shyh-Han Tan, Dechang Chen","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15192462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cancer staging, guided by anatomical and clinicopathologic factors, is essential for determining treatment strategies and patient prognosis. The current gold standard for prostate cancer is the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor, Lymph Node, and Metastasis (TNM) Staging System 9th Version (2024). This system incorporates five prognostic variables: tumor (T), spread to lymph nodes (N), metastasis (M), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (P), and Grade Group/Gleason score (G). While effective, further refinement of prognostic systems may improve prediction of patient outcomes and support more individualized treatment. <b>Methods:</b> We applied the Ensemble Algorithm for Clustering Cancer Data (EACCD), an unsupervised machine learning approach. EACCD involves three steps: calculating initial dissimilarities, performing ensemble learning, and conducting hierarchical clustering. We first developed an EACCD model using the five AJCC variables (T, N, M, P, G). The model was then expanded to include two additional factors, age (A) and race (R). Prostate cancer patient data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from the National Cancer Institute. <b>Results:</b> The EACCD algorithm effectively stratified patients into distinct prognostic groups, each with well-separated survival curves. The five-variable model achieved a concordance index (C-index) of 0.8293 (95% CI: 0.8245-0.8341), while the seven-variable model, including age and race, improved performance to 0.8504 (95% CI: 0.8461-0.8547). Both outperformed the AJCC TNM system, which had a C-index of 0.7676 (95% CI: 0.7622-0.7731). <b>Conclusions:</b> EACCD provides a refined prognostic framework for primary localized prostate cancer, demonstrating superior accuracy over the AJCC staging system. With further validation in independent cohorts, EACCD could enhance risk stratification and support precision oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cancer staging, guided by anatomical and clinicopathologic factors, is essential for determining treatment strategies and patient prognosis. The current gold standard for prostate cancer is the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor, Lymph Node, and Metastasis (TNM) Staging System 9th Version (2024). This system incorporates five prognostic variables: tumor (T), spread to lymph nodes (N), metastasis (M), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (P), and Grade Group/Gleason score (G). While effective, further refinement of prognostic systems may improve prediction of patient outcomes and support more individualized treatment. Methods: We applied the Ensemble Algorithm for Clustering Cancer Data (EACCD), an unsupervised machine learning approach. EACCD involves three steps: calculating initial dissimilarities, performing ensemble learning, and conducting hierarchical clustering. We first developed an EACCD model using the five AJCC variables (T, N, M, P, G). The model was then expanded to include two additional factors, age (A) and race (R). Prostate cancer patient data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from the National Cancer Institute. Results: The EACCD algorithm effectively stratified patients into distinct prognostic groups, each with well-separated survival curves. The five-variable model achieved a concordance index (C-index) of 0.8293 (95% CI: 0.8245-0.8341), while the seven-variable model, including age and race, improved performance to 0.8504 (95% CI: 0.8461-0.8547). Both outperformed the AJCC TNM system, which had a C-index of 0.7676 (95% CI: 0.7622-0.7731). Conclusions: EACCD provides a refined prognostic framework for primary localized prostate cancer, demonstrating superior accuracy over the AJCC staging system. With further validation in independent cohorts, EACCD could enhance risk stratification and support precision oncology.
DiagnosticsBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍:
Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.