Using Machine Learning to Create Prognostic Systems for Primary Prostate Cancer.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kevin Guan, Andy Guan, Anwar E Ahmed, Andrew J Waters, Shyh-Han Tan, Dechang Chen
{"title":"Using Machine Learning to Create Prognostic Systems for Primary Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Kevin Guan, Andy Guan, Anwar E Ahmed, Andrew J Waters, Shyh-Han Tan, Dechang Chen","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15192462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cancer staging, guided by anatomical and clinicopathologic factors, is essential for determining treatment strategies and patient prognosis. The current gold standard for prostate cancer is the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor, Lymph Node, and Metastasis (TNM) Staging System 9th Version (2024). This system incorporates five prognostic variables: tumor (T), spread to lymph nodes (N), metastasis (M), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (P), and Grade Group/Gleason score (G). While effective, further refinement of prognostic systems may improve prediction of patient outcomes and support more individualized treatment. <b>Methods:</b> We applied the Ensemble Algorithm for Clustering Cancer Data (EACCD), an unsupervised machine learning approach. EACCD involves three steps: calculating initial dissimilarities, performing ensemble learning, and conducting hierarchical clustering. We first developed an EACCD model using the five AJCC variables (T, N, M, P, G). The model was then expanded to include two additional factors, age (A) and race (R). Prostate cancer patient data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from the National Cancer Institute. <b>Results:</b> The EACCD algorithm effectively stratified patients into distinct prognostic groups, each with well-separated survival curves. The five-variable model achieved a concordance index (C-index) of 0.8293 (95% CI: 0.8245-0.8341), while the seven-variable model, including age and race, improved performance to 0.8504 (95% CI: 0.8461-0.8547). Both outperformed the AJCC TNM system, which had a C-index of 0.7676 (95% CI: 0.7622-0.7731). <b>Conclusions:</b> EACCD provides a refined prognostic framework for primary localized prostate cancer, demonstrating superior accuracy over the AJCC staging system. With further validation in independent cohorts, EACCD could enhance risk stratification and support precision oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cancer staging, guided by anatomical and clinicopathologic factors, is essential for determining treatment strategies and patient prognosis. The current gold standard for prostate cancer is the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor, Lymph Node, and Metastasis (TNM) Staging System 9th Version (2024). This system incorporates five prognostic variables: tumor (T), spread to lymph nodes (N), metastasis (M), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (P), and Grade Group/Gleason score (G). While effective, further refinement of prognostic systems may improve prediction of patient outcomes and support more individualized treatment. Methods: We applied the Ensemble Algorithm for Clustering Cancer Data (EACCD), an unsupervised machine learning approach. EACCD involves three steps: calculating initial dissimilarities, performing ensemble learning, and conducting hierarchical clustering. We first developed an EACCD model using the five AJCC variables (T, N, M, P, G). The model was then expanded to include two additional factors, age (A) and race (R). Prostate cancer patient data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from the National Cancer Institute. Results: The EACCD algorithm effectively stratified patients into distinct prognostic groups, each with well-separated survival curves. The five-variable model achieved a concordance index (C-index) of 0.8293 (95% CI: 0.8245-0.8341), while the seven-variable model, including age and race, improved performance to 0.8504 (95% CI: 0.8461-0.8547). Both outperformed the AJCC TNM system, which had a C-index of 0.7676 (95% CI: 0.7622-0.7731). Conclusions: EACCD provides a refined prognostic framework for primary localized prostate cancer, demonstrating superior accuracy over the AJCC staging system. With further validation in independent cohorts, EACCD could enhance risk stratification and support precision oncology.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用机器学习创建原发性前列腺癌的预后系统。
背景:在解剖学和临床病理因素的指导下,癌症分期对于确定治疗策略和患者预后至关重要。目前前列腺癌的金标准是美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)肿瘤、淋巴结和转移(TNM)分期系统第9版(2024年)。该系统包含五个预后变量:肿瘤(T)、淋巴结转移(N)、转移(M)、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平(P)和分级组/Gleason评分(G)。虽然有效,但进一步完善预后系统可能会改善对患者预后的预测,并支持更个性化的治疗。方法:我们应用了一种无监督机器学习方法——癌症数据聚类集成算法(EACCD)。EACCD包括三个步骤:计算初始差异,执行集成学习和进行分层聚类。我们首先利用AJCC的5个变量(T、N、M、P、G)建立了EACCD模型。然后将模型扩展到包括两个额外的因素,年龄(A)和种族(R)。前列腺癌患者数据来自国家癌症研究所的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)项目。结果:EACCD算法有效地将患者分层为不同的预后组,每个组都有良好分离的生存曲线。五变量模型的一致性指数(C-index)为0.8293 (95% CI: 0.8245-0.8341),而包括年龄和种族的七变量模型的一致性指数(C-index)为0.8504 (95% CI: 0.8461-0.8547)。两者都优于AJCC TNM系统,其c指数为0.7676 (95% CI: 0.7622-0.7731)。结论:EACCD为原发性局限性前列腺癌提供了一个完善的预后框架,比AJCC分期系统显示出更高的准确性。在独立队列的进一步验证中,EACCD可以增强风险分层和支持精确肿瘤学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信