The Relationship Between Non-Invasive Tests and Digital Pathology for Quantifying Liver Fibrosis in MASLD.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Xiaodie Wei, Lixia Qiu, Xinxin Wang, Chen Shao, Jing Zhao, Qiang Yang, Jun Chen, Meng Yin, Richard L Ehman, Jing Zhang
{"title":"The Relationship Between Non-Invasive Tests and Digital Pathology for Quantifying Liver Fibrosis in MASLD.","authors":"Xiaodie Wei, Lixia Qiu, Xinxin Wang, Chen Shao, Jing Zhao, Qiang Yang, Jun Chen, Meng Yin, Richard L Ehman, Jing Zhang","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15192475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> It is crucial to evaluate liver fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Digital pathology, an automated method for quantitative fibrosis measurement, provides valuable support to pathologists by providing refined continuous metrics and addressing inter-observer variability. Although non-invasive tests (NITs) have been validated as consistent with manual pathology, the relationship between digital pathology and NITs remains unexplored. <b>Methods:</b> This study included 99 biopsy-proven MASLD patients. Quantitative-fibrosis (Q-Fibrosis) used second-harmonic generation/two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy (SHG/TPEF) to quantify fibrosis parameters (q-FPs). Correlations between eight NITs and q-FPs were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Using manual pathology as standard, Q-Fibrosis exhibited excellent diagnostic performance in fibrosis stages assessment with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) ranging from 0.924 to 0.967. In addition, magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.781-0.977) among the eight NITs. Furthermore, MRE-assessed liver stiffness measurement (MRE-LSM) showed the strongest correlation with q-FPs, particularly adjusted by string length, string width, and the number of short and thick strings within the portal region. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both MRE and digital pathology demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy. MRE-LSM was primarily determined by collagen extent, location and pattern, which provide a new perspective for understanding the relationship between the change in MRE and histological fibrosis reverse.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12524164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192475","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is crucial to evaluate liver fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Digital pathology, an automated method for quantitative fibrosis measurement, provides valuable support to pathologists by providing refined continuous metrics and addressing inter-observer variability. Although non-invasive tests (NITs) have been validated as consistent with manual pathology, the relationship between digital pathology and NITs remains unexplored. Methods: This study included 99 biopsy-proven MASLD patients. Quantitative-fibrosis (Q-Fibrosis) used second-harmonic generation/two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy (SHG/TPEF) to quantify fibrosis parameters (q-FPs). Correlations between eight NITs and q-FPs were analyzed. Results: Using manual pathology as standard, Q-Fibrosis exhibited excellent diagnostic performance in fibrosis stages assessment with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) ranging from 0.924 to 0.967. In addition, magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.781-0.977) among the eight NITs. Furthermore, MRE-assessed liver stiffness measurement (MRE-LSM) showed the strongest correlation with q-FPs, particularly adjusted by string length, string width, and the number of short and thick strings within the portal region. Conclusions: Both MRE and digital pathology demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy. MRE-LSM was primarily determined by collagen extent, location and pattern, which provide a new perspective for understanding the relationship between the change in MRE and histological fibrosis reverse.

无创检测与数字病理定量诊断MASLD肝纤维化的关系。
背景:在代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)中评估肝纤维化是至关重要的。数字病理学是一种自动化的定量纤维化测量方法,通过提供精细的连续指标和解决观察者之间的差异,为病理学家提供了有价值的支持。虽然非侵入性检查(NITs)已被证实与手工病理一致,但数字病理与NITs之间的关系仍未被探索。方法:本研究纳入99例经活检证实的MASLD患者。定量纤维化(Q-Fibrosis)使用二次谐波产生/双光子激发荧光显微镜(SHG/TPEF)来量化纤维化参数(q-FPs)。分析8种NITs与q-FPs的相关性。结果:以手工病理为标准,Q-Fibrosis在纤维化分期评估中表现出优异的诊断性能,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(aus)范围为0.924 ~ 0.967。此外,磁共振弹性成像(MRE)在8种NITs中诊断准确率最高(AUC: 0.781-0.977)。此外,mre评估的肝脏硬度测量(MRE-LSM)显示与q-FPs的相关性最强,特别是通过弦长度、弦宽度以及门静脉区域内短弦和粗弦的数量进行调整。结论:MRE和数字病理均表现出良好的诊断准确性。MRE- lsm主要由胶原程度、位置和模式决定,这为理解MRE变化与组织学纤维化逆转的关系提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信