Clinician Perspectives on Digital and Computational Pathology: Clinical Benefits, Concerns, and Willingness to Adopt.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Charu Aggarwal, Aakash Desai, Nicholas McConnell, Nicholas Cadirov, Gary Gustavsen, Arushi Agarwal, Nabil Chehab, Srividya Kotapati, Nikunj Patel
{"title":"Clinician Perspectives on Digital and Computational Pathology: Clinical Benefits, Concerns, and Willingness to Adopt.","authors":"Charu Aggarwal, Aakash Desai, Nicholas McConnell, Nicholas Cadirov, Gary Gustavsen, Arushi Agarwal, Nabil Chehab, Srividya Kotapati, Nikunj Patel","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15192527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Precision medicine has transformed how we manage cancer patients. As treatments and drug targets become more complex, the associated diagnostic technologies must also evolve to actualize the benefit of these therapeutic innovations. Digital and computational pathology (DP/CP) play a pivotal role in this evolution, offering enhanced analytical techniques and addressing workflow constraints in pathology labs. This study aims to understand clinicians' awareness, utilization, and willingness to adopt DP/CP-based tools, as well as the role they perceive themselves playing in the adoption of CP-based tests. <b>Methods</b>: A double-blinded, online quantitative survey was conducted among 101 U.S.-based medical oncologists. <b>Results</b>: Awareness of DP/CP varied among clinicians, with only 17% identifying as very aware. Subsequently, the current utilization of CP-based tests is also low. Despite this, clinicians are optimistic about the potential benefits of DP/CP, including reduced turnaround times, improved therapy selection, and more consistent slide review. To achieve full adoption, clinicians recognize that barriers must be addressed, including cost, regulatory guidance and, to a lesser extent, concerns with the \"black box\" nature of CP algorithms. While the focus for the adoption of DP has centered on pathologists, clinicians anticipate playing a more significant role in the adoption of CP-based tests. Finally, clinicians demonstrated clear willingness to utilize a CP-based CDx, with 90% of respondents identifying as potential adopters. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study highlights a positive outlook for the adoption of DP/CP among clinicians, despite varied awareness and low current utilization. Clinicians recognize the potential benefits of DP/CP but also acknowledge barriers to adoption. Addressing these barriers through education, regulatory approval, and collaboration with pathologists and biopharma is essential for successfully integrating DP/CP technologies into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192527","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Precision medicine has transformed how we manage cancer patients. As treatments and drug targets become more complex, the associated diagnostic technologies must also evolve to actualize the benefit of these therapeutic innovations. Digital and computational pathology (DP/CP) play a pivotal role in this evolution, offering enhanced analytical techniques and addressing workflow constraints in pathology labs. This study aims to understand clinicians' awareness, utilization, and willingness to adopt DP/CP-based tools, as well as the role they perceive themselves playing in the adoption of CP-based tests. Methods: A double-blinded, online quantitative survey was conducted among 101 U.S.-based medical oncologists. Results: Awareness of DP/CP varied among clinicians, with only 17% identifying as very aware. Subsequently, the current utilization of CP-based tests is also low. Despite this, clinicians are optimistic about the potential benefits of DP/CP, including reduced turnaround times, improved therapy selection, and more consistent slide review. To achieve full adoption, clinicians recognize that barriers must be addressed, including cost, regulatory guidance and, to a lesser extent, concerns with the "black box" nature of CP algorithms. While the focus for the adoption of DP has centered on pathologists, clinicians anticipate playing a more significant role in the adoption of CP-based tests. Finally, clinicians demonstrated clear willingness to utilize a CP-based CDx, with 90% of respondents identifying as potential adopters. Conclusions: This study highlights a positive outlook for the adoption of DP/CP among clinicians, despite varied awareness and low current utilization. Clinicians recognize the potential benefits of DP/CP but also acknowledge barriers to adoption. Addressing these barriers through education, regulatory approval, and collaboration with pathologists and biopharma is essential for successfully integrating DP/CP technologies into clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

临床医生对数字和计算病理学的看法:临床益处、关注点和采用意愿。
背景/目的:精准医学改变了我们治疗癌症患者的方式。随着治疗和药物靶点变得越来越复杂,相关的诊断技术也必须发展,以实现这些治疗创新的好处。数字和计算病理学(DP/CP)在这一演变中发挥了关键作用,提供了增强的分析技术,并解决了病理实验室的工作流程限制。本研究旨在了解临床医生对采用基于DP/ cp的工具的认知、利用和意愿,以及他们认为自己在采用基于cp的测试中所起的作用。方法:对101名美国内科肿瘤学家进行双盲在线定量调查。结果:临床医生对DP/CP的认识各不相同,只有17%的人认为非常了解。因此,目前基于cp的测试的使用率也很低。尽管如此,临床医生对DP/CP的潜在益处持乐观态度,包括缩短周转时间、改进治疗选择和更一致的幻灯片审查。为了实现全面采用,临床医生认识到必须解决障碍,包括成本、监管指导,以及在较小程度上关注CP算法的“黑箱”性质。虽然采用DP的焦点集中在病理学家身上,但临床医生预计在采用基于cp的测试中发挥更重要的作用。最后,临床医生明确表示愿意使用基于cp的CDx, 90%的受访者认为他们是潜在的采用者。结论:本研究强调了临床医生采用DP/CP的积极前景,尽管认识不一,目前使用率较低。临床医生认识到DP/CP的潜在好处,但也承认采用的障碍。通过教育、监管批准以及与病理学家和生物制药公司的合作来解决这些障碍,是将DP/CP技术成功整合到临床实践中的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信