Neural correlates of social influence in persuasion process: a hyperscanning EEG study on negotiation.

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Cognitive Neurodynamics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-13 DOI:10.1007/s11571-025-10353-8
Flavia Ciminaghi, Katia Rovelli, Carlotta Acconito, Michela Balconi
{"title":"Neural correlates of social influence in persuasion process: a hyperscanning EEG study on negotiation.","authors":"Flavia Ciminaghi, Katia Rovelli, Carlotta Acconito, Michela Balconi","doi":"10.1007/s11571-025-10353-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Group decision-making requires integrating different perspectives through persuasion, which involves unidirectional social influence, and negotiation, which is a reciprocal interaction based on cooperation and competition. While neuroscientific research has focused on identifying brain activations associated with these processes and their influencing factors, the impact of a prior persuasive dynamic on a subsequent negotiation task remains unexplored. This study examines whether engaging in a persuasive task, in which one individual has a role of social influence, affects neural activity during a subsequent negotiation. Using a hyperscanning paradigm with electroencephalography (EEG), frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma) were analyzed in frontal, temporo-central and parieto-occipital regions in a sample of 26 participants. Results highlight distinct brain activation patterns between former persuaders and former receivers, with increased left-hemisphere delta activity and frontal theta and alpha activation in persuaders, while former receivers exhibited higher beta activity in the right parieto-occipital regions in the final stage of negotiation and higher gamma activity in right-lateralized regions. Overall, the study suggests that prior persuasive interactions shape subsequent negotiation at a neural level, influencing emotional, cognitive, and strategic engagement, with potential implications for understanding social dynamics in group interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10500,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","volume":"19 1","pages":"165"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-025-10353-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Group decision-making requires integrating different perspectives through persuasion, which involves unidirectional social influence, and negotiation, which is a reciprocal interaction based on cooperation and competition. While neuroscientific research has focused on identifying brain activations associated with these processes and their influencing factors, the impact of a prior persuasive dynamic on a subsequent negotiation task remains unexplored. This study examines whether engaging in a persuasive task, in which one individual has a role of social influence, affects neural activity during a subsequent negotiation. Using a hyperscanning paradigm with electroencephalography (EEG), frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma) were analyzed in frontal, temporo-central and parieto-occipital regions in a sample of 26 participants. Results highlight distinct brain activation patterns between former persuaders and former receivers, with increased left-hemisphere delta activity and frontal theta and alpha activation in persuaders, while former receivers exhibited higher beta activity in the right parieto-occipital regions in the final stage of negotiation and higher gamma activity in right-lateralized regions. Overall, the study suggests that prior persuasive interactions shape subsequent negotiation at a neural level, influencing emotional, cognitive, and strategic engagement, with potential implications for understanding social dynamics in group interactions.

说服过程中社会影响的神经关联:谈判的超扫描脑电图研究。
群体决策需要通过说服整合不同的观点,这涉及到单向的社会影响,而谈判则是基于合作与竞争的互惠互动。虽然神经科学研究的重点是确定与这些过程相关的大脑激活及其影响因素,但先前的说服动态对随后的谈判任务的影响仍未得到探索。本研究考察了在一个具有社会影响力的说服任务中,一个人是否会在随后的谈判中影响神经活动。采用超扫描脑电图(EEG)模式,分析了26名参与者额叶、颞中央和顶枕区域的频带(δ、θ、α、β和γ)。结果显示,前说服者和前接受者的大脑活动模式不同,说服者的左半球δ活动、额叶θ和α活动增加,而前接受者在谈判的最后阶段表现出更高的右侧顶枕区β活动,右侧区域更高的γ活动。总的来说,研究表明,先前的说服互动在神经层面塑造了随后的谈判,影响了情感、认知和战略参与,对理解群体互动中的社会动态具有潜在的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Neurodynamics
Cognitive Neurodynamics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
18.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neurodynamics provides a unique forum of communication and cooperation for scientists and engineers working in the field of cognitive neurodynamics, intelligent science and applications, bridging the gap between theory and application, without any preference for pure theoretical, experimental or computational models. The emphasis is to publish original models of cognitive neurodynamics, novel computational theories and experimental results. In particular, intelligent science inspired by cognitive neuroscience and neurodynamics is also very welcome. The scope of Cognitive Neurodynamics covers cognitive neuroscience, neural computation based on dynamics, computer science, intelligent science as well as their interdisciplinary applications in the natural and engineering sciences. Papers that are appropriate for non-specialist readers are encouraged. 1. There is no page limit for manuscripts submitted to Cognitive Neurodynamics. Research papers should clearly represent an important advance of especially broad interest to researchers and technologists in neuroscience, biophysics, BCI, neural computer and intelligent robotics. 2. Cognitive Neurodynamics also welcomes brief communications: short papers reporting results that are of genuinely broad interest but that for one reason and another do not make a sufficiently complete story to justify a full article publication. Brief Communications should consist of approximately four manuscript pages. 3. Cognitive Neurodynamics publishes review articles in which a specific field is reviewed through an exhaustive literature survey. There are no restrictions on the number of pages. Review articles are usually invited, but submitted reviews will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信