LVEF 53% as a Novel Mortality Predictor in Pediatric Heart Failure: A Multicenter Biomarker-Stratified Analysis.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Muhammad Junaid Akram, Jiajin Li, Asad Nawaz, Xu Qian, Haixin Huang, Jinpeng Zhang, Zahoor Elahi, Lingjuan Liu, Bo Pan, Yuxing Yuan, Tian Jie
{"title":"LVEF 53% as a Novel Mortality Predictor in Pediatric Heart Failure: A Multicenter Biomarker-Stratified Analysis.","authors":"Muhammad Junaid Akram, Jiajin Li, Asad Nawaz, Xu Qian, Haixin Huang, Jinpeng Zhang, Zahoor Elahi, Lingjuan Liu, Bo Pan, Yuxing Yuan, Tian Jie","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15192530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Pediatric heart failure (PHF) remains a major contributor to morbidity and mortality, yet standardized diagnostic and prognostic frameworks-particularly those leveraging left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)-are not well-established. This study evaluates clinical profiles, therapeutic interventions, and mortality outcomes across LVEF thresholds while identifying an optimal cutoff to refine risk stratification in PHF. <b>Methods</b>: This multicenter retrospective cohort study analyzed 1449 PHF patients (aged 1-18 years) across 30 tertiary centers (2013-2022). LVEF stratification employed conventional thresholds (50%, 55%) and an ROC-optimized cutoff (53%, derived via Youden index maximization). The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for clinical covariates, evaluated mortality predictors. The discriminative performance of LVEF thresholds was compared using area under the curve (AUC) analysis. <b>Results</b>: Distinct clinical profiles, etiologies, and treatments were observed across LVEF strata (50% vs. 55%; <i>p</i> < 0.05). A data-driven optimized LVEF threshold of 53% was identified for mortality prediction, demonstrating superior diagnostic accuracy with enhanced sensitivity and specificity across age groups. Multivariate analysis revealed LVEF ≥ 55% as protective (OR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68-0.96, <i>p</i> = 0.003), while ≥50% was non-significant (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.74-1.12, <i>p</i> = 0.06). Elevated BNP (OR = 2.78, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and NT-proBNP (OR = 2.34, <i>p</i> < 0.001) strongly correlated with mortality risk. Age and sex showed no significant association with outcomes. <b>Conclusion</b>: In conclusion, an LVEF of 53% emerged as the optimal pediatric threshold for mortality prediction, outperforming conventional cutoffs of 50% and 55%. The integration of LVEF with biomarkers (BNP/NT-proBNP) provides a robust prognostic framework, underscoring the necessity for pediatric-specific LVEF criteria and multidimensional risk assessment in PHF management.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12524215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192530","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric heart failure (PHF) remains a major contributor to morbidity and mortality, yet standardized diagnostic and prognostic frameworks-particularly those leveraging left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)-are not well-established. This study evaluates clinical profiles, therapeutic interventions, and mortality outcomes across LVEF thresholds while identifying an optimal cutoff to refine risk stratification in PHF. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study analyzed 1449 PHF patients (aged 1-18 years) across 30 tertiary centers (2013-2022). LVEF stratification employed conventional thresholds (50%, 55%) and an ROC-optimized cutoff (53%, derived via Youden index maximization). The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for clinical covariates, evaluated mortality predictors. The discriminative performance of LVEF thresholds was compared using area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Results: Distinct clinical profiles, etiologies, and treatments were observed across LVEF strata (50% vs. 55%; p < 0.05). A data-driven optimized LVEF threshold of 53% was identified for mortality prediction, demonstrating superior diagnostic accuracy with enhanced sensitivity and specificity across age groups. Multivariate analysis revealed LVEF ≥ 55% as protective (OR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68-0.96, p = 0.003), while ≥50% was non-significant (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.74-1.12, p = 0.06). Elevated BNP (OR = 2.78, p < 0.001) and NT-proBNP (OR = 2.34, p < 0.001) strongly correlated with mortality risk. Age and sex showed no significant association with outcomes. Conclusion: In conclusion, an LVEF of 53% emerged as the optimal pediatric threshold for mortality prediction, outperforming conventional cutoffs of 50% and 55%. The integration of LVEF with biomarkers (BNP/NT-proBNP) provides a robust prognostic framework, underscoring the necessity for pediatric-specific LVEF criteria and multidimensional risk assessment in PHF management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

LVEF 53%作为儿童心力衰竭新的死亡率预测指标:一项多中心生物标志物分层分析
背景:儿童心力衰竭(PHF)仍然是导致发病率和死亡率的主要因素,然而标准化的诊断和预后框架——特别是利用左心室射血分数(LVEF)的诊断和预后框架——尚未建立。本研究评估了LVEF阈值的临床概况、治疗干预和死亡率结果,同时确定了优化PHF风险分层的最佳截止点。方法:本多中心回顾性队列研究分析了30个三级中心(2013-2022)的1449例PHF患者(年龄1-18岁)。LVEF分层采用传统阈值(50%,55%)和roc优化截止值(53%,通过约登指数最大化得出)。主要终点是院内全因死亡率。多变量逻辑回归模型,调整临床协变量,评估死亡率预测因子。采用曲线下面积(AUC)分析比较LVEF阈值的判别性能。结果:在不同的LVEF层中观察到不同的临床特征、病因和治疗方法(50%比55%;p < 0.05)。数据驱动的优化LVEF阈值为53%,用于死亡率预测,显示出卓越的诊断准确性,提高了各年龄组的敏感性和特异性。多因素分析显示,LVEF≥55%具有保护作用(OR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68-0.96, p = 0.003),而≥50%无保护作用(OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.74-1.12, p = 0.06)。BNP升高(OR = 2.78, p < 0.001)和NT-proBNP升高(OR = 2.34, p < 0.001)与死亡风险密切相关。年龄和性别与结果无显著关联。结论:综上所述,53%的LVEF是预测儿童死亡率的最佳阈值,优于50%和55%的常规临界值。LVEF与生物标志物(BNP/NT-proBNP)的整合提供了一个强大的预后框架,强调了儿科特异性LVEF标准和PHF管理中多维风险评估的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信