Differences in Vaginal Microbiota Composition Between Infertile and Fertile Patients: A Prospective Study.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Pei-Chen Chen, Shih-Fen Chen, Wei-Tung Hung, Yu-Ying Lin, Ling-Chun Lin, Jen-Hung Wang, Pao-Chu Chen
{"title":"Differences in Vaginal Microbiota Composition Between Infertile and Fertile Patients: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Pei-Chen Chen, Shih-Fen Chen, Wei-Tung Hung, Yu-Ying Lin, Ling-Chun Lin, Jen-Hung Wang, Pao-Chu Chen","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15192544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Dysbiosis of the vaginal microbiota, particularly the loss of Lactobacillus spp. dominance, is linked to female infertility. While community state types (CSTs) I-III and V have been studied extensively, CST IV remains underexplored. The aim of this prospective study was to compare vaginal microbiota composition-specifically CST IVA and IVB-between fertile and infertile women. <b>Methods</b>: Vaginal samples were collected from 22 women (15 infertile, 7 fertile) using cervical brushes and analyzed via 16S rRNA gene sequencing. DNA was extracted, and V3-V4 regions were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Taxonomic classification was performed with QIIME 2 and the Greengenes database. Differences in microbial composition were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in SPSS v21.0. <b>Results</b>: Infertile women showed lower relative abundances of <i>Lactobacillus</i> spp. (31.54% vs. 42.32%) and <i>Oscillospira</i> spp. relative to fertile women. CST IV was more frequent in the infertile group (29.75% vs. 21.61%). Within CST IV, CST IVA accounted for a higher proportion in infertile women (7.0% vs. 0.94%), with <i>Prevotella</i> spp. representing 95.18% of CST IVA in infertile subjects, as opposed to the figure of 69.77% in fertile counterparts. No clear differences in CST IVB were observed between groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: Increased prevalence of <i>Prevotella</i> spp. in CST IVA may contribute to an unfavorable vaginal environment in infertile women, potentially affecting sperm viability. The presence of <i>Oscillospira</i> spp. in fertile women suggests it is associated with a healthy vaginal microbiota profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192544","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Dysbiosis of the vaginal microbiota, particularly the loss of Lactobacillus spp. dominance, is linked to female infertility. While community state types (CSTs) I-III and V have been studied extensively, CST IV remains underexplored. The aim of this prospective study was to compare vaginal microbiota composition-specifically CST IVA and IVB-between fertile and infertile women. Methods: Vaginal samples were collected from 22 women (15 infertile, 7 fertile) using cervical brushes and analyzed via 16S rRNA gene sequencing. DNA was extracted, and V3-V4 regions were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Taxonomic classification was performed with QIIME 2 and the Greengenes database. Differences in microbial composition were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (p < 0.05) in SPSS v21.0. Results: Infertile women showed lower relative abundances of Lactobacillus spp. (31.54% vs. 42.32%) and Oscillospira spp. relative to fertile women. CST IV was more frequent in the infertile group (29.75% vs. 21.61%). Within CST IV, CST IVA accounted for a higher proportion in infertile women (7.0% vs. 0.94%), with Prevotella spp. representing 95.18% of CST IVA in infertile subjects, as opposed to the figure of 69.77% in fertile counterparts. No clear differences in CST IVB were observed between groups. Conclusions: Increased prevalence of Prevotella spp. in CST IVA may contribute to an unfavorable vaginal environment in infertile women, potentially affecting sperm viability. The presence of Oscillospira spp. in fertile women suggests it is associated with a healthy vaginal microbiota profile.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不孕和可育患者阴道微生物群组成差异:一项前瞻性研究。
背景/目的:阴道菌群失调,特别是乳酸菌优势性的丧失,与女性不育有关。虽然社区状态类型(CST) I-III和V已被广泛研究,但CST IV仍未得到充分探索。这项前瞻性研究的目的是比较生殖道和不育妇女阴道微生物群组成-特别是CST IVA和ivb。方法:采用宫颈刷法采集22例女性(不孕症15例,可育症7例)阴道标本,进行16S rRNA基因测序分析。提取DNA,利用Illumina MiSeq平台对V3-V4区进行测序。采用QIIME 2和Greengenes数据库进行分类。微生物组成差异采用SPSS v21.0的Wilcoxon秩和检验(p < 0.05)。结果:不育妇女的乳杆菌(Lactobacillus spp)和示波螺旋体(Oscillospira spp)的相对丰度(31.54% vs. 42.32%)低于育龄妇女。CST IV在不育组更常见(29.75% vs. 21.61%)。在CST IV中,CST IVA在不育女性中所占比例较高(7.0%对0.94%),其中普雷沃氏菌属占不育受试者CST IVA的95.18%,而在可育受试者中则为69.77%。各组间CST IVB无明显差异。结论:CST IVA中普雷沃氏菌的增加可能导致不孕妇女阴道环境不利,可能影响精子的生存能力。在有生育能力的妇女中存在示波器螺旋体表明它与健康的阴道微生物群有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信