Diagnostic Performance of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Evaluating Sacroiliitis Activity in Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Parya Valizadeh, Payam Jannatdoust, Kimia Darmiani, Peyman Mirghaderi, Rachael Stovall, Majid Chalian
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Evaluating Sacroiliitis Activity in Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Parya Valizadeh, Payam Jannatdoust, Kimia Darmiani, Peyman Mirghaderi, Rachael Stovall, Majid Chalian","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the sacroiliac joints. MRI detects inflammation, but conventional sequences are non-quantitative. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging quantifies diffusion and perfusion without contrast agents and may address this limitation. We evaluated whether IVIM parameters distinguish active from inactive sacroiliitis and from healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches in Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus identified studies reporting the diagnostic performance of IVIM parameters-Dslow (pure diffusion), Dfast (pseudodiffusion), and perfusion fraction (f)-for sacroiliitis, up to August 2025. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated with a bivariate random-effects model; heterogeneity with I2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies comprising 541 participants (178 active sacroiliitis, 277 inactive sacroiliitis, 86 healthy controls) were included. Dslow demonstrated the highest accuracy for differentiating active from inactive sacroiliitis (sensitivity: 86.3%, specificity: 88.1%, AUC: 0.93) and from healthy controls (sensitivity: 89.3%, specificity: 96.3%, AUC: 0.98). Diagnostic accuracy declined for distinguishing inactive sacroiliitis from controls (AUC: 0.72). Dfast and f showed lower diagnostic performances.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinically, IVIM-especially Dslow-may serve as a non-contrast adjunct for activity stratification and follow-up; confirmation requires prospective multicentre studies with pre-specified thresholds, direct comparisons with apparent diffusion coefficient and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and assessment of management and cost impact.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This is the first study to meta-analyze and systematically review IVIM for SpA activity monitoring. It confirms the potential capability of IVIM-especially Dslow-as a potential imaging biomarker.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf258","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the sacroiliac joints. MRI detects inflammation, but conventional sequences are non-quantitative. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging quantifies diffusion and perfusion without contrast agents and may address this limitation. We evaluated whether IVIM parameters distinguish active from inactive sacroiliitis and from healthy controls.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches in Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus identified studies reporting the diagnostic performance of IVIM parameters-Dslow (pure diffusion), Dfast (pseudodiffusion), and perfusion fraction (f)-for sacroiliitis, up to August 2025. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated with a bivariate random-effects model; heterogeneity with I2.

Results: Six studies comprising 541 participants (178 active sacroiliitis, 277 inactive sacroiliitis, 86 healthy controls) were included. Dslow demonstrated the highest accuracy for differentiating active from inactive sacroiliitis (sensitivity: 86.3%, specificity: 88.1%, AUC: 0.93) and from healthy controls (sensitivity: 89.3%, specificity: 96.3%, AUC: 0.98). Diagnostic accuracy declined for distinguishing inactive sacroiliitis from controls (AUC: 0.72). Dfast and f showed lower diagnostic performances.

Conclusion: Clinically, IVIM-especially Dslow-may serve as a non-contrast adjunct for activity stratification and follow-up; confirmation requires prospective multicentre studies with pre-specified thresholds, direct comparisons with apparent diffusion coefficient and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and assessment of management and cost impact.

Advances in knowledge: This is the first study to meta-analyze and systematically review IVIM for SpA activity monitoring. It confirms the potential capability of IVIM-especially Dslow-as a potential imaging biomarker.

体素内非相干运动成像在评估轴性脊柱炎患者骶髂炎活动性中的诊断价值:一项荟萃分析。
目的:轴性脊柱炎(axSpA)是一种影响骶髂关节的慢性炎症性疾病。MRI检测炎症,但传统的序列是不定量的。体素内非相干运动(IVIM)成像在没有造影剂的情况下量化扩散和灌注,可以解决这一限制。我们评估了IVIM参数是否能区分活动性和非活动性骶髂炎以及健康对照。方法:本系统综述和荟萃分析遵循PRISMA指南。在Web of Science、PubMed、Embase和Scopus中进行文献检索,发现了报告IVIM参数(dslow(纯扩散)、Dfast(假扩散)和灌注分数(f))对骶髂炎诊断性能的研究,截止到2025年8月。采用双变量随机效应模型计算合并敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC);I2的非均质性。结果:纳入6项研究,包括541名参与者(178名活动性骶髂炎患者,277名非活动性骶髂炎患者,86名健康对照)。Dslow在区分活动性和非活动性骶髂炎(敏感性:86.3%,特异性:88.1%,AUC: 0.93)和健康对照(敏感性:89.3%,特异性:96.3%,AUC: 0.98)方面显示出最高的准确性。区分非活动性骶髂炎与对照组的诊断准确性下降(AUC: 0.72)。Dfast和f的诊断性能较低。结论:临床中,ivim(尤其是dslow)可作为活动性分层和随访的非对比辅助手段;确认需要预先设定阈值的前瞻性多中心研究,直接比较表观扩散系数和动态对比增强MRI,并评估管理和成本影响。知识进展:这是第一个荟萃分析和系统回顾IVIM用于SpA活动监测的研究。这证实了ivim——尤其是dslow——作为一种潜在的成像生物标志物的潜在能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信