Francesco Mezzapesa, Elisabetta Pia Bilancia, Margarita Afonina, Stella Di Costanzo, Elena Masina, Pierandrea De Iaco, Anna Myriam Perrone
{"title":"Is YouTube™ a Reliable Source of Information for the Current Use of HIPEC in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer?","authors":"Francesco Mezzapesa, Elisabetta Pia Bilancia, Margarita Afonina, Stella Di Costanzo, Elena Masina, Pierandrea De Iaco, Anna Myriam Perrone","doi":"10.3390/cancers17193222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: YouTube™ is a widely accessible platform with unfiltered medical information. This study aimed to evaluate the educational value and reliability of YouTube™ videos on Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treatment. <b>Methods</b>: YouTube™ videos were searched using the keywords \"<i>ovarian cancer</i>\", \"<i>debulking surgery</i>\", \"<i>hyperthermic</i>\", and \"<i>HIPEC</i>\". Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Content (PEMAT A/V) score, DISCERN, Misinformation Scale, and the Global Quality Scale (GQS) were employed to assess the clarity, quality, and reliability of the information presented. <b>Results</b>: Of the 150 YouTube™ videos screened, 71 were suitable for analysis and categorized by target audience (general public vs. healthcare workers). Most (57, 80.2%) were uploaded after the \"Ov-HIPEC\" trial (18 January 2018), with a trend toward more videos for healthcare workers (<i>p</i> = 0.07). Videos for the general public were shorter (<i>p</i> < 0.001) but received more views (<i>p</i> = 0.06) and likes (<i>p</i> = 0.09), though they were of lower quality. The DISCERN score averaged 50 (IQR: 35-60), with public-targeted videos being less informative (<i>p</i> < 0.001), a trend mirrored by the Misinformation Scale (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and GQS (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The PEMAT A/V scores showed 80% Understandability (IQR: 62-90) and 33% Actionability (IQR: 25-100), with no significant difference between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.15, <i>p</i> = 0.4). <b>Conclusions</b>: While YouTube™ provides useful information for healthcare professionals, it cannot be considered a reliable source for patients seeking information on HIPEC for ovarian cancer. Many videos contribute to misinformation by not properly explaining treatment indications, timing, adverse effects, multimodal approaches, or clinical trial findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17193222","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: YouTube™ is a widely accessible platform with unfiltered medical information. This study aimed to evaluate the educational value and reliability of YouTube™ videos on Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treatment. Methods: YouTube™ videos were searched using the keywords "ovarian cancer", "debulking surgery", "hyperthermic", and "HIPEC". Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Content (PEMAT A/V) score, DISCERN, Misinformation Scale, and the Global Quality Scale (GQS) were employed to assess the clarity, quality, and reliability of the information presented. Results: Of the 150 YouTube™ videos screened, 71 were suitable for analysis and categorized by target audience (general public vs. healthcare workers). Most (57, 80.2%) were uploaded after the "Ov-HIPEC" trial (18 January 2018), with a trend toward more videos for healthcare workers (p = 0.07). Videos for the general public were shorter (p < 0.001) but received more views (p = 0.06) and likes (p = 0.09), though they were of lower quality. The DISCERN score averaged 50 (IQR: 35-60), with public-targeted videos being less informative (p < 0.001), a trend mirrored by the Misinformation Scale (p < 0.001) and GQS (p < 0.001). The PEMAT A/V scores showed 80% Understandability (IQR: 62-90) and 33% Actionability (IQR: 25-100), with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.15, p = 0.4). Conclusions: While YouTube™ provides useful information for healthcare professionals, it cannot be considered a reliable source for patients seeking information on HIPEC for ovarian cancer. Many videos contribute to misinformation by not properly explaining treatment indications, timing, adverse effects, multimodal approaches, or clinical trial findings.
期刊介绍:
Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.