Guardians' preferences for pit and fissure sealing services in China: evidence from a discrete choice experiment.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Zhu Chen, Sixuan Chen, Jiajia Liu, Xinyu Jin, Fangyu Song, Zhengxi Sun, Wang Yao, Wenhua Xu, Lidan Wang
{"title":"Guardians' preferences for pit and fissure sealing services in China: evidence from a discrete choice experiment.","authors":"Zhu Chen, Sixuan Chen, Jiajia Liu, Xinyu Jin, Fangyu Song, Zhengxi Sun, Wang Yao, Wenhua Xu, Lidan Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-07012-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental caries represents a significant global public health challenge, with particularly high prevalence rates observed among Chinese children. Pit and fissure sealing (PFS) has been established as an effective and cost-efficient preventive intervention, yet service coverage remains suboptimal in China. This study examines guardians' preferences and preference heterogeneity regarding PFS services, with the aim of informing tailored service delivery and policy interventions to enhance PFS uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A discrete choice experiment was conducted through face-to-face interviews with 411 guardians. Four key attributes were included: preventive effectiveness, preventive service time, distance and out-of-pocket (OOP) service cost. Data were analysed using a mixed logit model, subgroup analyses and scenario analyses were performed to examine preference heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preventive effectiveness (41.31%) emerged as the most influential attribute, followed by distance (29.23%), OOP service cost (15.85%) and preventive service time (13.61%). Female guardians and guardians of children with poor oral health status placed greater emphasis on preventive effectiveness and distance. In contrast, male guardians were more focused on OOP service cost. Guardians with higher education levels and guardians of children with better oral health status were more inclined to schedule PFS services during vacations. The scenario analysis revealed that guardians prefer PFS services with general effectiveness but higher accessibility and lower OOP costs, rather than those offering superior effectiveness but compromised accessibility and higher financial burden. Notably, medical insurance coverage boosted service uptake from 18.3% to 71.0%, with guardians willing to pay 127 Chinese yuan more for insured services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight substantial preference heterogeneity among guardians and underscore the transformative potential of insurance coverage in enhancing service accessibility. Policymakers should consider incorporating PFS services into medical insurance coverage and optimizing service arrangements to meet the needs of different guardian groups in order to improve the coverage and effectiveness of PFS services.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1625"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-07012-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dental caries represents a significant global public health challenge, with particularly high prevalence rates observed among Chinese children. Pit and fissure sealing (PFS) has been established as an effective and cost-efficient preventive intervention, yet service coverage remains suboptimal in China. This study examines guardians' preferences and preference heterogeneity regarding PFS services, with the aim of informing tailored service delivery and policy interventions to enhance PFS uptake.

Methods: A discrete choice experiment was conducted through face-to-face interviews with 411 guardians. Four key attributes were included: preventive effectiveness, preventive service time, distance and out-of-pocket (OOP) service cost. Data were analysed using a mixed logit model, subgroup analyses and scenario analyses were performed to examine preference heterogeneity.

Results: Preventive effectiveness (41.31%) emerged as the most influential attribute, followed by distance (29.23%), OOP service cost (15.85%) and preventive service time (13.61%). Female guardians and guardians of children with poor oral health status placed greater emphasis on preventive effectiveness and distance. In contrast, male guardians were more focused on OOP service cost. Guardians with higher education levels and guardians of children with better oral health status were more inclined to schedule PFS services during vacations. The scenario analysis revealed that guardians prefer PFS services with general effectiveness but higher accessibility and lower OOP costs, rather than those offering superior effectiveness but compromised accessibility and higher financial burden. Notably, medical insurance coverage boosted service uptake from 18.3% to 71.0%, with guardians willing to pay 127 Chinese yuan more for insured services.

Conclusion: These findings highlight substantial preference heterogeneity among guardians and underscore the transformative potential of insurance coverage in enhancing service accessibility. Policymakers should consider incorporating PFS services into medical insurance coverage and optimizing service arrangements to meet the needs of different guardian groups in order to improve the coverage and effectiveness of PFS services.

Clinical trial number: not applicable.

中国监护人对坑和裂隙密封服务的偏好:来自离散选择实验的证据。
背景:龋齿是一项重大的全球公共卫生挑战,在中国儿童中观察到的患病率尤其高。深坑和裂缝密封(PFS)已成为一种有效且经济的预防性干预措施,但在中国,服务覆盖率仍不理想。本研究考察了监护人对PFS服务的偏好和偏好异质性,旨在为量身定制的服务提供和政策干预提供信息,以提高PFS的吸收。方法:采用离散选择实验,对411名监护人进行面对面访谈。四个关键属性包括:预防效果、预防服务时间、距离和自费(OOP)服务费用。使用混合logit模型分析数据,进行亚组分析和情景分析以检验偏好异质性。结果:影响预防效果的因素占41.31%,其次是距离(29.23%)、面向对象服务费用(15.85%)和预防服务时间(13.61%)。女性监护人和口腔健康状况不佳儿童的监护人更重视预防效果和距离。男性监护人更关注面向对象服务成本。受教育程度较高的监护人和口腔健康状况较好的儿童监护人更倾向于在假期安排PFS服务。情境分析显示,监护人更倾向于选择效能一般、可及性较高、面向对象成本较低的PFS服务,而非效能较好、可及性较差、财务负担较高的PFS服务。值得注意的是,医疗保险覆盖率将服务覆盖率从18.3%提高到71.0%,监护人愿意为保险服务多支付127元人民币。结论:这些发现突出了监护人之间的偏好异质性,并强调了保险覆盖在提高服务可及性方面的变革潜力。政策制定者应考虑将养老服务纳入医保范围,优化服务安排,满足不同监护群体的需求,以提高养老服务的覆盖面和有效性。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信