Zoe Can, Cristian A Vasquez, Susan E Peters, Jeremy F Dawson
{"title":"The role of healthcare providers in sustainable return-to-work for individuals with common mental disorders.","authors":"Zoe Can, Cristian A Vasquez, Susan E Peters, Jeremy F Dawson","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldaf018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many individuals with common mental disorders (CMDs) face challenges after returning to work following sickness absence. Healthcare providers and healthcare systems are well-placed to provide returnees with support which can facilitate sustainable return-to-work.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>This narrative review has integrated data and literature from journal articles, reports, book chapters, and official NHS and UK statistics bodies.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Individual healthcare providers and healthcare systems can take various actions to support sustainable return-to-work for individuals with CMDs. These include utilizing shared decision-making, maintaining communication with other stakeholders, and delivering suitable interventions. Healthcare leadership systems should prioritize improving relevant provider knowledge and skills as many lack confidence managing cases involving return-to-work.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>Healthcare providers face uncertainty about which supportive actions fall within their scope of practice.Growing points: Research interest in sustainable return-to-work appears to have grown in recent years.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>Future research should seek to clarify the definition of sustainable return-to-work and examine how resources across system levels can support sustainable return-to-work.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"156 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12526974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldaf018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Many individuals with common mental disorders (CMDs) face challenges after returning to work following sickness absence. Healthcare providers and healthcare systems are well-placed to provide returnees with support which can facilitate sustainable return-to-work.
Sources of data: This narrative review has integrated data and literature from journal articles, reports, book chapters, and official NHS and UK statistics bodies.
Areas of agreement: Individual healthcare providers and healthcare systems can take various actions to support sustainable return-to-work for individuals with CMDs. These include utilizing shared decision-making, maintaining communication with other stakeholders, and delivering suitable interventions. Healthcare leadership systems should prioritize improving relevant provider knowledge and skills as many lack confidence managing cases involving return-to-work.
Areas of controversy: Healthcare providers face uncertainty about which supportive actions fall within their scope of practice.Growing points: Research interest in sustainable return-to-work appears to have grown in recent years.
Areas timely for developing research: Future research should seek to clarify the definition of sustainable return-to-work and examine how resources across system levels can support sustainable return-to-work.
期刊介绍:
British Medical Bulletin is a multidisciplinary publication, which comprises high quality reviews aimed at generalist physicians, junior doctors, and medical students in both developed and developing countries.
Its key aims are to provide interpretations of growing points in medicine by trusted experts in the field, and to assist practitioners in incorporating not just evidence but new conceptual ways of thinking into their practice.