A national audit of head injury discharge advice.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
British Journal of Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-16 DOI:10.1080/02688697.2025.2565284
Arnav S Singh, Yash Dinesh, Nicholas Gikas, Philip J O'Halloran, David J Davies, Antonio Belli, Andrew R Stevens
{"title":"A national audit of head injury discharge advice.","authors":"Arnav S Singh, Yash Dinesh, Nicholas Gikas, Philip J O'Halloran, David J Davies, Antonio Belli, Andrew R Stevens","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2025.2565284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Head injury is a common presentation to emergency departments, and most patients are discharged with a diagnosis of concussion. Written discharge advice provided to patients serves as a critical tool to communicate signs of surgical deterioration and to convey management principles to reduce long-term morbidity associated with concussion. This study aimed to evaluate the compliance of head injury discharge leaflets with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, national audit of practice was conducted to assess the adherence of head injury discharge leaflets to NICE head injury guidelines (NG232) across all eligible NHS England trusts. Compliance against each domain was evaluated in duplicate against a standardised, piloted proforma, with overall quality summarised as an average score. Exploratory analysis between domains was performed, with comparative analysis between leaflets for adult and paediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>None of the 99 leaflets reviewed (0/99) complied with all aspects of NICE guidance. The mean score of the leaflets was 0.42 out of 1, falling short of the set target of 0.95. There was no significant difference in mean scores between adult and paediatric leaflets. Safety information based on surgically-relevant deterioration achieved the compliance target of 95%. Advice on concussion management (including symptoms to expect, return to normal activities, and the details about further support and information in case of persistent symptoms) was generally poor. Additionally, 50.5% (50/99) of leaflets advised against returning to activities 'until feeling completely back to normal', which contradicts current guidance. The quality of head injury discharge leaflets currently does not meet satisfactory standards. A centrally curated, regularly updated discharge leaflet, with provision for local modifications, is recommended to standardise practice based on current specialist practice. This is a cost-effective intervention which has considerable potential to improve outcomes after head injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"464-474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2025.2565284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Head injury is a common presentation to emergency departments, and most patients are discharged with a diagnosis of concussion. Written discharge advice provided to patients serves as a critical tool to communicate signs of surgical deterioration and to convey management principles to reduce long-term morbidity associated with concussion. This study aimed to evaluate the compliance of head injury discharge leaflets with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional, national audit of practice was conducted to assess the adherence of head injury discharge leaflets to NICE head injury guidelines (NG232) across all eligible NHS England trusts. Compliance against each domain was evaluated in duplicate against a standardised, piloted proforma, with overall quality summarised as an average score. Exploratory analysis between domains was performed, with comparative analysis between leaflets for adult and paediatric patients.

Results and conclusions: None of the 99 leaflets reviewed (0/99) complied with all aspects of NICE guidance. The mean score of the leaflets was 0.42 out of 1, falling short of the set target of 0.95. There was no significant difference in mean scores between adult and paediatric leaflets. Safety information based on surgically-relevant deterioration achieved the compliance target of 95%. Advice on concussion management (including symptoms to expect, return to normal activities, and the details about further support and information in case of persistent symptoms) was generally poor. Additionally, 50.5% (50/99) of leaflets advised against returning to activities 'until feeling completely back to normal', which contradicts current guidance. The quality of head injury discharge leaflets currently does not meet satisfactory standards. A centrally curated, regularly updated discharge leaflet, with provision for local modifications, is recommended to standardise practice based on current specialist practice. This is a cost-effective intervention which has considerable potential to improve outcomes after head injury.

对头部受伤出院建议的国家审计。
目的:头部损伤是急诊科常见的表现,大多数患者出院时诊断为脑震荡。向患者提供书面出院建议是沟通手术恶化迹象和传达管理原则以减少脑震荡相关长期发病率的重要工具。本研究旨在评估脑损伤出院传单是否符合国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)的指导。材料和方法:对所有符合条件的NHS英格兰信托机构进行了一项横断面的全国实践审计,以评估脑损伤出院传单对NICE脑损伤指南(NG232)的遵守情况。对每个领域的遵从性进行一式两份的评估,以标准化、试点形式进行评估,并将总体质量总结为平均分数。进行了域之间的探索性分析,并对成人和儿科患者的传单进行了比较分析。结果和结论:审查的99份宣传单(0/99)均未符合NICE指南的所有方面。传单的平均得分为0.42分(满分为1分),没有达到设定的0.95分的目标。成人和儿童的平均得分没有显著差异。基于手术相关恶化的安全信息达到了95%的符合性目标。关于脑震荡管理的建议(包括预期的症状、恢复正常活动,以及在持续症状的情况下提供进一步支持和信息的细节)通常很差。此外,50.5%(50/99)的传单建议“在感觉完全恢复正常之前”不要重返活动,这与目前的指导方针相矛盾。目前,头部损伤出院宣传单的质量不符合标准。建议制定一份中央管理的、定期更新的出院手册,并提供地方修改条款,以根据目前的专家做法使做法标准化。这是一种具有成本效益的干预措施,对改善头部损伤后的预后具有相当大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Neurosurgery
British Journal of Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide. Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书