Assessment of skin in patients with systemic sclerosis using high-frequency ultrasound and shear wave elastography: A comparative study with histology, molecular and clinical parameters.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Ruhani Desai, Filemon Tan, Minghua Wu, Jeffery L Browning, Samuel Theodore, Meng Zhang, Brian Skaug, Harshdeep Singh Chawla, Manmohan Singh, Salavat Aglyamov, Kirill V Larin, Maureen Mayes, Shervin Assassi
{"title":"Assessment of skin in patients with systemic sclerosis using high-frequency ultrasound and shear wave elastography: A comparative study with histology, molecular and clinical parameters.","authors":"Ruhani Desai, Filemon Tan, Minghua Wu, Jeffery L Browning, Samuel Theodore, Meng Zhang, Brian Skaug, Harshdeep Singh Chawla, Manmohan Singh, Salavat Aglyamov, Kirill V Larin, Maureen Mayes, Shervin Assassi","doi":"10.1002/acr.25658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ultrasound (US) has been proposed as a potential tool for assessing skin fibrosis in systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, a large-scale comparison of US-based assessment with histological markers of skin fibrosis has not been reported. We evaluated the US-based skin assessments for their face validity (differentiation between involved SSc and healthy control [HC] skin), construct validity (comparison to modified Rodnan Skin score [mRSS]), and criterion validity (comparison to histological and gene expression fibrosis markers).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty HCs and 52 SSc patients underwent clinical and US assessment followed by a forearm skin biopsy. Predefined areas were assessed on the finger, hand, and forearm bilaterally. mRSS, US, histological and molecular (RT-qPCR) evaluations were performed by blinded, independent assessors. Dermal thickness, echogenicity, and elastography were assessed using a high-frequency GE LOGIQ P9 ultrasound machine.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Except in the hand area, the US variables could not differentiate between HC and clinically affected SSc skin (face validity). There was only a weak to moderate correlation between US-based measurements and mRSS in the hand and finger areas (construct validity). US-based thickness showed moderate correlation with histological thickness (Rs=0.43, 0.002), but no statistically significant correlations with other histological or gene expression markers of fibrosis in SSc patients (criterion validity).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-frequency US assessment of SSc skin does not show consistent and strong face, construct, or criterion validity. The role of this assessment tool remains limited, underscoring the need for further development of a quantitative and accurate tool for assessing SSc skin fibrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25658","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Ultrasound (US) has been proposed as a potential tool for assessing skin fibrosis in systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, a large-scale comparison of US-based assessment with histological markers of skin fibrosis has not been reported. We evaluated the US-based skin assessments for their face validity (differentiation between involved SSc and healthy control [HC] skin), construct validity (comparison to modified Rodnan Skin score [mRSS]), and criterion validity (comparison to histological and gene expression fibrosis markers).

Method: Twenty HCs and 52 SSc patients underwent clinical and US assessment followed by a forearm skin biopsy. Predefined areas were assessed on the finger, hand, and forearm bilaterally. mRSS, US, histological and molecular (RT-qPCR) evaluations were performed by blinded, independent assessors. Dermal thickness, echogenicity, and elastography were assessed using a high-frequency GE LOGIQ P9 ultrasound machine.

Result: Except in the hand area, the US variables could not differentiate between HC and clinically affected SSc skin (face validity). There was only a weak to moderate correlation between US-based measurements and mRSS in the hand and finger areas (construct validity). US-based thickness showed moderate correlation with histological thickness (Rs=0.43, 0.002), but no statistically significant correlations with other histological or gene expression markers of fibrosis in SSc patients (criterion validity).

Conclusion: High-frequency US assessment of SSc skin does not show consistent and strong face, construct, or criterion validity. The role of this assessment tool remains limited, underscoring the need for further development of a quantitative and accurate tool for assessing SSc skin fibrosis.

使用高频超声和剪切波弹性成像评估系统性硬化症患者的皮肤:组织学、分子和临床参数的比较研究。
目的:超声(US)已被提出作为评估系统性硬化症(SSc)皮肤纤维化的潜在工具。然而,美国评估与皮肤纤维化组织学标记物的大规模比较尚未报道。我们评估了基于美国的皮肤评估的面部效度(涉及的SSc和健康对照[HC]皮肤的区分)、结构效度(与改良罗德曼皮肤评分[mRSS]的比较)和标准效度(与组织学和基因表达纤维化标志物的比较)。方法:20例hc和52例SSc患者进行了临床和美国评估,并进行了前臂皮肤活检。在双侧手指、手和前臂上评估预定义区域。mRSS, US,组织学和分子(RT-qPCR)评估由盲法独立评估者进行。使用GE LOGIQ P9高频超声仪评估皮肤厚度、回声性和弹性成像。结果:除手部外,US变量不能区分HC和临床影响的SSc皮肤(面部效度)。基于基础的测量与手部和手指区域的mRSS之间只有弱到中等的相关性(结构效度)。基底细胞厚度与组织学厚度有中度相关性(Rs=0.43, 0.002),但与SSc患者纤维化的其他组织学或基因表达标志物无统计学显著相关性(标准效度)。结论:SSc皮肤的高频US评估没有显示出一致和强大的面部、结构或标准效度。该评估工具的作用仍然有限,强调需要进一步开发定量和准确的工具来评估SSc皮肤纤维化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信