Incubation assay metrics describe different aspects of dissolved carbon degradation

IF 1.9 3区 地球科学 Q2 LIMNOLOGY
Michelle C. Kelly, Isaac Bigcraft, Prajakta Paresh Kokate, Laura E. Brown, Evan S. Kane, Stephen Techtmann, Trista J. Vick-Majors, Amy M. Marcarelli
{"title":"Incubation assay metrics describe different aspects of dissolved carbon degradation","authors":"Michelle C. Kelly,&nbsp;Isaac Bigcraft,&nbsp;Prajakta Paresh Kokate,&nbsp;Laura E. Brown,&nbsp;Evan S. Kane,&nbsp;Stephen Techtmann,&nbsp;Trista J. Vick-Majors,&nbsp;Amy M. Marcarelli","doi":"10.1002/lom3.10712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dissolved organic matter (DOM) incubation experiments are an important method for disentangling the effects of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) characteristics and microbial community composition on carbon (C) bioreactivity. However, common quantification metrics (ΔDOC, biodegradability, C removal rate) measure different aspects of C degradation and can change through time, suggesting experimental conclusions may depend on the metric used and the time of measurement. We performed an incubation experiment crossing varying DOM sources and microbial communities and synthesized published experimental data to explore (1) whether the interpretation of C degradation activity changed with the metric used, (2) how incubation duration impacted measures of degradation, and (3) how these different metrics compared across studies. Through our incubation experiment, we found that all metrics agreed regarding which treatments were associated with the greatest amounts of C degradation, and in all cases we observed peak C removal rates within 24 h of incubation initiation. However, our literature synthesis found that just 10% of studies sampled within the first 24 h of incubation initiation, suggesting common measurement intervals may miss peak C removal rates. Using these findings, we propose combinations of C degradation metrics and sampling frequencies that may be especially effective for detecting differences in C bioavailability, microbial activity, or C degradation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18145,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","volume":"23 10","pages":"742-753"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lom3.10712","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dissolved organic matter (DOM) incubation experiments are an important method for disentangling the effects of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) characteristics and microbial community composition on carbon (C) bioreactivity. However, common quantification metrics (ΔDOC, biodegradability, C removal rate) measure different aspects of C degradation and can change through time, suggesting experimental conclusions may depend on the metric used and the time of measurement. We performed an incubation experiment crossing varying DOM sources and microbial communities and synthesized published experimental data to explore (1) whether the interpretation of C degradation activity changed with the metric used, (2) how incubation duration impacted measures of degradation, and (3) how these different metrics compared across studies. Through our incubation experiment, we found that all metrics agreed regarding which treatments were associated with the greatest amounts of C degradation, and in all cases we observed peak C removal rates within 24 h of incubation initiation. However, our literature synthesis found that just 10% of studies sampled within the first 24 h of incubation initiation, suggesting common measurement intervals may miss peak C removal rates. Using these findings, we propose combinations of C degradation metrics and sampling frequencies that may be especially effective for detecting differences in C bioavailability, microbial activity, or C degradation.

Abstract Image

孵育试验指标描述了溶解碳降解的不同方面
溶解有机物(DOM)培养实验是研究溶解有机碳(DOC)特性和微生物群落组成对碳(C)生物反应性影响的重要方法。然而,常用的量化指标(ΔDOC,生物降解性,C去除率)测量C降解的不同方面,并且可以随着时间的推移而变化,这表明实验结论可能取决于所使用的指标和测量时间。我们进行了一项跨越不同DOM来源和微生物群落的孵育实验,并综合了已发表的实验数据,以探索(1)C降解活性的解释是否随着使用的度量而改变,(2)孵育时间如何影响降解度量,以及(3)如何在研究中比较这些不同的度量。通过我们的培养实验,我们发现所有的指标都同意哪些处理与最大的C降解有关,并且在所有情况下,我们在培养开始后24小时内观察到峰值C去除率。然而,我们的文献综合发现,只有10%的研究在孵育开始的前24小时内采样,这表明常见的测量间隔可能会错过峰值C去除率。利用这些发现,我们提出了C降解指标和采样频率的组合,这可能特别有效地检测C生物利用度、微生物活性或C降解的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Limnology and Oceanography: Methods (ISSN 1541-5856) is a companion to ASLO''s top-rated journal Limnology and Oceanography, and articles are held to the same high standards. In order to provide the most rapid publication consistent with high standards, Limnology and Oceanography: Methods appears in electronic format only, and the entire submission and review system is online. Articles are posted as soon as they are accepted and formatted for publication. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods will consider manuscripts whose primary focus is methodological, and that deal with problems in the aquatic sciences. Manuscripts may present new measurement equipment, techniques for analyzing observations or samples, methods for understanding and interpreting information, analyses of metadata to examine the effectiveness of approaches, invited and contributed reviews and syntheses, and techniques for communicating and teaching in the aquatic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信