Desegregating through densification? Potential and limitations in the case of Oslo

IF 4.1 1区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Rebecca Cavicchia, Roberta Cucca
{"title":"Desegregating through densification? Potential and limitations in the case of Oslo","authors":"Rebecca Cavicchia, Roberta Cucca","doi":"10.1177/00420980251372728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban densification is widely regarded as a key strategy for promoting sustainability and fostering social diversity in cities. While it has often been advocated as a means to enhance social mix, research indicates that, without effective housing policies and regulations, it can instead drive up rents and property prices, leading to displacement and exclusionary pressures. In Oslo, the case study of this investigation, densification has been the primary development strategy, particularly in the historically less affluent eastern districts, where former industrial sites have been transformed into residential areas. We argue that when densification occurs within a fully deregulated housing system and is primarily driven by private developers and speculative investment, it tends to create conditions that facilitate exclusionary dynamics. However, the possible social implications can be different depending on the location of densification interventions. By analyzing census-tract level data on tenure structure, household typology, country background, education level, age structure, and income, we explore whether newly developed densification areas in Oslo exhibit a more homogeneous or socially mixed profile across the eastern and western parts of the city. Findings suggest that while densification areas in the east side of the city support gentrification dynamics, those in the west seem to rather have de-segregating effects.","PeriodicalId":51350,"journal":{"name":"Urban Studies","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251372728","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban densification is widely regarded as a key strategy for promoting sustainability and fostering social diversity in cities. While it has often been advocated as a means to enhance social mix, research indicates that, without effective housing policies and regulations, it can instead drive up rents and property prices, leading to displacement and exclusionary pressures. In Oslo, the case study of this investigation, densification has been the primary development strategy, particularly in the historically less affluent eastern districts, where former industrial sites have been transformed into residential areas. We argue that when densification occurs within a fully deregulated housing system and is primarily driven by private developers and speculative investment, it tends to create conditions that facilitate exclusionary dynamics. However, the possible social implications can be different depending on the location of densification interventions. By analyzing census-tract level data on tenure structure, household typology, country background, education level, age structure, and income, we explore whether newly developed densification areas in Oslo exhibit a more homogeneous or socially mixed profile across the eastern and western parts of the city. Findings suggest that while densification areas in the east side of the city support gentrification dynamics, those in the west seem to rather have de-segregating effects.
通过致密化来消除种族隔离?奥斯陆案例的潜力和局限性
城市密度化被广泛认为是促进城市可持续性和促进社会多样性的关键战略。虽然它经常被提倡作为加强社会混合的一种手段,但研究表明,如果没有有效的住房政策和法规,它反而会推高租金和房地产价格,导致流离失所和排斥压力。在本次调查的案例研究——奥斯陆,高密度化一直是主要的发展战略,特别是在历史上不太富裕的东部地区,那里以前的工业区已被改造成住宅区。我们认为,当致密化发生在完全放松管制的住房体系内,并主要由私人开发商和投机投资驱动时,它往往会创造有利于排他性动态的条件。然而,可能的社会影响可能是不同的,取决于致密化干预的位置。通过分析人口普查区的权属结构、家庭类型、国家背景、教育水平、年龄结构和收入数据,我们探讨了奥斯陆新开发的高密度区在城市的东部和西部是否表现出更均匀或社会混合的特征。研究结果表明,虽然城市东侧的人口密集区支持中产阶级化的动力,但西部的人口密集区似乎更倾向于消除种族隔离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urban Studies
Urban Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
8.50%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Urban Studies was first published in 1964 to provide an international forum of social and economic contributions to the fields of urban and regional planning. Since then, the Journal has expanded to encompass the increasing range of disciplines and approaches that have been brought to bear on urban and regional problems. Contents include original articles, notes and comments, and a comprehensive book review section. Regular contributions are drawn from the fields of economics, planning, political science, statistics, geography, sociology, population studies and public administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信