Disentangling the mechanisms behind indirect interactions between plants via shared pollinators: Effects of neutral and niche‐based processes

IF 5.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Yong‐Deng He, Amparo Lázaro, Pedro J. Bergamo, Huan Liang, Chun‐Feng Yang, Zhong‐Ming Ye
{"title":"Disentangling the mechanisms behind indirect interactions between plants via shared pollinators: Effects of neutral and niche‐based processes","authors":"Yong‐Deng He, Amparo Lázaro, Pedro J. Bergamo, Huan Liang, Chun‐Feng Yang, Zhong‐Ming Ye","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.70184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>Indirect interactions between plants via shared pollinators play a crucial role in structuring and stabilizing ecological communities. Although both neutral (interactions occurring in proportion to species abundance) and niche‐based (involving morphological matching and phenological overlap) processes are known to structure plant–pollinator interactions, how these processes drive the formation and maintenance of indirect interactions between plants in pollination networks remains poorly understood.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Here, we investigated a species‐rich alpine meadow in southwest China to disentangle the potential mechanisms underlying indirect interactions between plants via shared pollinators. We analysed data from the plant–Hymenoptera network, the plant–Diptera network and the whole network combining all plants and pollinators to (1) quantify the prevalence of indirect interactions between plants and their contribution to network structure; (2) assess how plant traits related to neutral (flower abundance) and niche‐based (flower phenology, morphology and phylogeny) processes influence indirect interactions between plants; (3) evaluate the extent to which indirect interactions between plants could be predicted by neutral and niche‐based processes.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We found that indirect interactions between plants were highly prevalent across all networks and were related to increased contribution to nestedness, an important structure for network stability and the maintenance of species diversity. Corolla‐tube length dissimilarity was the primary driver of the probability of indirect interactions between plants in both the whole network and the plant–Hymenoptera network, while flowering length had the greatest influence in the plant–Diptera network. Across all networks, flower abundance emerged as the key factor determining the strength of these interactions. Moreover, neutral and niche‐based processes effectively predicted indirect interactions between plants, with neutral processes showing stronger predictive performance than the others.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:italic>Synthesis</jats:italic>. Overall, our study quantifies the prevalence of indirect interactions between plants in pollination networks and their influence on network structure and systematically elucidates the potential mechanisms underlying these interactions. These findings offer new insights into the ecological processes that govern species coexistence and contribute to the maintenance of biodiversity in plant–pollinator communities.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.70184","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indirect interactions between plants via shared pollinators play a crucial role in structuring and stabilizing ecological communities. Although both neutral (interactions occurring in proportion to species abundance) and niche‐based (involving morphological matching and phenological overlap) processes are known to structure plant–pollinator interactions, how these processes drive the formation and maintenance of indirect interactions between plants in pollination networks remains poorly understood. Here, we investigated a species‐rich alpine meadow in southwest China to disentangle the potential mechanisms underlying indirect interactions between plants via shared pollinators. We analysed data from the plant–Hymenoptera network, the plant–Diptera network and the whole network combining all plants and pollinators to (1) quantify the prevalence of indirect interactions between plants and their contribution to network structure; (2) assess how plant traits related to neutral (flower abundance) and niche‐based (flower phenology, morphology and phylogeny) processes influence indirect interactions between plants; (3) evaluate the extent to which indirect interactions between plants could be predicted by neutral and niche‐based processes. We found that indirect interactions between plants were highly prevalent across all networks and were related to increased contribution to nestedness, an important structure for network stability and the maintenance of species diversity. Corolla‐tube length dissimilarity was the primary driver of the probability of indirect interactions between plants in both the whole network and the plant–Hymenoptera network, while flowering length had the greatest influence in the plant–Diptera network. Across all networks, flower abundance emerged as the key factor determining the strength of these interactions. Moreover, neutral and niche‐based processes effectively predicted indirect interactions between plants, with neutral processes showing stronger predictive performance than the others. Synthesis. Overall, our study quantifies the prevalence of indirect interactions between plants in pollination networks and their influence on network structure and systematically elucidates the potential mechanisms underlying these interactions. These findings offer new insights into the ecological processes that govern species coexistence and contribute to the maintenance of biodiversity in plant–pollinator communities.
通过共享传粉媒介揭示植物间间接相互作用的机制:中性和生态位过程的影响
植物间通过共享传粉媒介的间接相互作用在构建和稳定生态群落中起着至关重要的作用。虽然中性(相互作用与物种丰度成比例)和基于生态位(涉及形态匹配和物候重叠)的过程都是植物与传粉者相互作用的结构,但这些过程如何驱动传粉网络中植物之间间接相互作用的形成和维持仍然知之甚少。本文以中国西南地区一个物种丰富的高寒草甸为研究对象,探讨植物间通过共享传粉媒介间接相互作用的潜在机制。我们分析了植物-膜翅目昆虫网络、植物-双翅目昆虫网络以及所有植物和传粉者结合的整个网络的数据,以:(1)量化植物之间间接相互作用的普遍程度及其对网络结构的贡献;(2)评估与中性(花丰度)和基于生态位(花物候、形态和系统发育)过程相关的植物性状如何影响植物间的间接相互作用;(3)评价植物间间接相互作用在多大程度上可以通过中性过程和生态位过程来预测。我们发现植物之间的间接相互作用在所有网络中都非常普遍,并且与巢性的贡献增加有关,巢性是网络稳定性和物种多样性维持的重要结构。花冠-管长差异是植物间间接相互作用的主要驱动因素,在植物-膜翅目昆虫网络中,花冠-管长差异是植物间间接相互作用的主要驱动因素,而在植物-双翅目昆虫网络中,花冠-管长差异的影响最大。在所有网络中,花卉丰度成为决定这些相互作用强度的关键因素。此外,中性过程和基于生态位的过程有效地预测了植物之间的间接相互作用,中性过程比其他过程具有更强的预测性能。合成。总的来说,我们的研究量化了传粉网络中植物间间接相互作用的普遍性及其对网络结构的影响,并系统地阐明了这些相互作用的潜在机制。这些发现为物种共存的生态过程提供了新的见解,并有助于维持植物-传粉者群落的生物多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ecology
Journal of Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.50%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Ecology publishes original research papers on all aspects of the ecology of plants (including algae), in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. We do not publish papers concerned solely with cultivated plants and agricultural ecosystems. Studies of plant communities, populations or individual species are accepted, as well as studies of the interactions between plants and animals, fungi or bacteria, providing they focus on the ecology of the plants. We aim to bring important work using any ecological approach (including molecular techniques) to a wide international audience and therefore only publish papers with strong and ecological messages that advance our understanding of ecological principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信