Processing strategy or representation difference? Investigating the word segmentation difficulty of second language learners of Chinese

IF 2.6 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Panpan Yao, Huangxia Li, Xinwei Chen, Xingshan Li
{"title":"Processing strategy or representation difference? Investigating the word segmentation difficulty of second language learners of Chinese","authors":"Panpan Yao, Huangxia Li, Xinwei Chen, Xingshan Li","doi":"10.1017/s1366728925100643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due to the lack of explicit word boundary markers, L2-Chinese learners have shown some difficulties in Chinese word segmentation. This study aimed to tackle the possible reasons of L2-Chinese learners’ difficulties in word segmentation: L1-biased processing strategy or developing mental representations of Chinese compound words, or both. In an eye-tracking experiment, high-frequency two-character Chinese compound words were used as targets. These compound words were embedded in sentences where their first component characters with prior verbs were manipulated to be either plausible or implausible, while the whole compound words were always plausible. Sentences were presented in character-spaced or word-spaced style. High-proficiency L2-Chinese learners and native Chinese speakers participated. Results revealed non-native-like patterns of L2-Chinese learners: they holistically processed compound words only in the word-spaced condition, while native speakers did so regardless how sentences were presented. The findings indicated that high-proficiency L2-Chinese learners’ difficulty in word segmentation is predominantly caused by their L1-biased processing strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8758,"journal":{"name":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","volume":"123 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728925100643","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the lack of explicit word boundary markers, L2-Chinese learners have shown some difficulties in Chinese word segmentation. This study aimed to tackle the possible reasons of L2-Chinese learners’ difficulties in word segmentation: L1-biased processing strategy or developing mental representations of Chinese compound words, or both. In an eye-tracking experiment, high-frequency two-character Chinese compound words were used as targets. These compound words were embedded in sentences where their first component characters with prior verbs were manipulated to be either plausible or implausible, while the whole compound words were always plausible. Sentences were presented in character-spaced or word-spaced style. High-proficiency L2-Chinese learners and native Chinese speakers participated. Results revealed non-native-like patterns of L2-Chinese learners: they holistically processed compound words only in the word-spaced condition, while native speakers did so regardless how sentences were presented. The findings indicated that high-proficiency L2-Chinese learners’ difficulty in word segmentation is predominantly caused by their L1-biased processing strategy.

加工策略还是表征差异?汉语第二语言学习者分词困难的调查研究
由于缺乏明确的词边界标记,l2 -汉语学习者在汉语分词时遇到了一些困难。本研究旨在探讨l2 -汉语学习者分词困难的可能原因:l1偏向的加工策略或形成汉语复合词的心理表征,或两者兼而有之。在眼动追踪实验中,以高频双字汉语复合词为实验对象。这些复合词被嵌入句子中,它们的第一个组成词与先行动词被操纵为似是而非,而整个复合词总是似是而非的。句子以字符间隔或单词间隔的方式呈现。高水平的汉语学习者和母语为汉语的人参与其中。结果揭示了l2 -汉语学习者的非母语模式:他们只在单词间隔条件下整体处理复合词,而母语人士无论句子如何呈现都会这样做。结果表明,高水平l2 -汉语学习者分词困难的主要原因是他们的l1偏向加工策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信