Educational Attainment and Outcomes of Hemodialysis Access Creation.

IF 0.7
Nyah Patel, Anna Schneider, Thomas W Cheng, Andrea Alonso, Thomas McNamara, Khuaten Maaneb De Macedo, Elizabeth King, Alik Farber, Jeffrey J Siracuse
{"title":"Educational Attainment and Outcomes of Hemodialysis Access Creation.","authors":"Nyah Patel, Anna Schneider, Thomas W Cheng, Andrea Alonso, Thomas McNamara, Khuaten Maaneb De Macedo, Elizabeth King, Alik Farber, Jeffrey J Siracuse","doi":"10.1177/15385744251387567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveHigher education has historically correlated with improved health outcomes, yet its impacts on end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing hemodialysis are not well understood. The goal of this study was to characterize patient factors and outcomes associated with initial arteriovenous (AV) access creation by patient education level.MethodsWe performed a single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent initial AV access creation from 2014-2021. Education groups were defined as primary (elementary school), secondary (middle/high school equivalent), and tertiary (college or higher). Univariable, multivariable, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed.ResultsWe identified 480 patients with primary (20.2%), secondary (54.6%), or tertiary education levels (25.2%). Patients with primary education were more likely to be of Hispanic ethnicity (58.8% primary vs 17.9% secondary vs 9.9% tertiary; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) or underinsured (Medicaid/uninsured) (62.9% vs 46.2% vs 39.7%; <i>P</i> < .001), but less likely to have English proficiency (27.1% vs 79.4% vs 77.5% tertiary; <i>P</i> < .001).Univariable analysis showed no significant differences in access-related steal or 30-day readmission. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, 2-year survival was 89.5% (primary education), 89.1% (secondary education), and 89.7% (tertiary education) (<i>P</i> = .99). Maturation at 180 days was 80.8%, 75.4%, and 75.3%, respectively (<i>P</i> = .4). On multivariable analysis, neither 30-day index readmission nor loss of primary patency were significantly associated with education level.ConclusionsAlthough education level was not associated with adverse outcomes once patients were undergoing hemodialysis, many of our patients only have primary school education. Earlier attempts at improving healthcare literacy and preventative care should be examined before the deterioration of kidney function.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"15385744251387567"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251387567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveHigher education has historically correlated with improved health outcomes, yet its impacts on end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing hemodialysis are not well understood. The goal of this study was to characterize patient factors and outcomes associated with initial arteriovenous (AV) access creation by patient education level.MethodsWe performed a single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent initial AV access creation from 2014-2021. Education groups were defined as primary (elementary school), secondary (middle/high school equivalent), and tertiary (college or higher). Univariable, multivariable, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed.ResultsWe identified 480 patients with primary (20.2%), secondary (54.6%), or tertiary education levels (25.2%). Patients with primary education were more likely to be of Hispanic ethnicity (58.8% primary vs 17.9% secondary vs 9.9% tertiary; P < 0.0001) or underinsured (Medicaid/uninsured) (62.9% vs 46.2% vs 39.7%; P < .001), but less likely to have English proficiency (27.1% vs 79.4% vs 77.5% tertiary; P < .001).Univariable analysis showed no significant differences in access-related steal or 30-day readmission. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, 2-year survival was 89.5% (primary education), 89.1% (secondary education), and 89.7% (tertiary education) (P = .99). Maturation at 180 days was 80.8%, 75.4%, and 75.3%, respectively (P = .4). On multivariable analysis, neither 30-day index readmission nor loss of primary patency were significantly associated with education level.ConclusionsAlthough education level was not associated with adverse outcomes once patients were undergoing hemodialysis, many of our patients only have primary school education. Earlier attempts at improving healthcare literacy and preventative care should be examined before the deterioration of kidney function.

教育程度和血液透析通路创造的结果。
目的高等教育历来与改善健康状况相关,但其对终末期肾病(ESRD)血液透析患者的影响尚不清楚。本研究的目的是通过患者的教育水平来描述与初始动静脉(AV)通道创建相关的患者因素和结果。方法:我们对2014-2021年首次进行房室通路创建的患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。教育群体被定义为小学(小学)、中学(相当于初中/高中)和大学(大学或更高)。进行单变量、多变量和Kaplan-Meier分析。结果480例患者的教育程度分别为初等(20.2%)、中等(54.6%)和高等教育(25.2%)。受过初等教育的患者更有可能是西班牙裔(58.8%初等教育vs 17.9%中等教育vs 9.9%高等教育;P < 0.0001)或保险不足(医疗补助/未保险)(62.9% vs 46.2% vs 39.7%; P < 0.001),但英语熟练程度较低(27.1% vs 79.4% vs 77.5%高等教育;P < 0.001)。单变量分析显示,与通道相关的偷窃或30天再入院无显著差异。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,2年生存率为89.5%(初等教育)、89.1%(中等教育)和89.7%(高等教育)(P = 0.99)。180天成熟率分别为80.8%、75.4%和75.3% (P = 0.4)。在多变量分析中,30天再入院指数和原发性通畅丧失与教育水平均无显著相关性。结论虽然患者接受血液透析后的文化程度与不良后果无关,但我们的许多患者只有小学文化程度。应该在肾功能恶化之前检查早期提高保健知识和预防保健的尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信